Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here

+8
boltonbonce
Sluffy
okocha
BoltonTillIDie
Angry Dad
wanderlust
Norpig
finlaymcdanger
12 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 3]

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

By the way Nat,I hope Cecil is OK after the mangle incident. My old Dad always said to me 'Never use a mangle when you're aroused'.
It's a maxim that's stood me in good stead over the years.

okocha

okocha
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Nat, I was only referring to Bread whose night-time musings seem alcohol-fuelled sometimes, whereas we're all aware that you have no vices of that nature. How's the Pepsi and Twirls diet going?

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

y2johnny wrote:Does breaders really need to be banned. Yeah i didnt agree with what he said to kp and i even said so but ffs there'll be no one left at this rate

Yes, I really believe he did need to be banned.

At the end of the day real people come here (or at least they used to) for a bit of news about the club and maybe a laugh or two as well.

They've stopped doing it because its been negative and at times nasty on here for quite sometime now.

I don't know if Natasha was joking or serious when she said she was leaving - but one thing she did say was true was the site was constantly negative and repetitive.

I know you and Bread have been close on here and may even have met on business in real life but on Nuts he's been extreme about everything and anything he doesn't agree with for over a year now.

I've put up with the personal shit he's thrown at me for THREE YEARS and I wouldn't wish anyone else to suffer the same thing - in fact I'm sure they wouldn't - and that was why I finally had to act.

Not only has Karly not done anything wrong but if he decided he didn't want to hang about to get constantly abused by Bread (like I have) over fuck all on the internet, then Nuts would be far the worst because of it - and more importantly it would be morally wrong to stand by and watch it happen over and over again to someone else.

Bread doesn't even want to post on Nuts anymore other than negative abuse - he's posted ten times in the last ten days - he seems to prefer abusing people on twitter these days - so I doubt he will miss us very much if at all.

There are real people behind the screens and there has to be some element of responsibility for what they post.

I/we have simply had enough of Bread's abuse for simply trying our best to make Nuts as good as we are able to for everyone's enjoyment - we don't make anything for our time and efforts in doing so and its all given happily and freely.

If Bread thinks that me, Karly and God knows who else are losers because we didn't do what he wanted on the internet then he can go and  find somewhere else that is more to his liking.

If he did want to lose his agendas then the Nuts door will still open to him.




Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

boltonbonce wrote:
y2johnny wrote:Does breaders really need to be banned. Yeah i didnt agree with what he said to kp and i even said so but ffs there'll be no one left at this rate
We've had this before. I'm sure we'll have it again.

I think Sluffy said,in another post, that Breadman had some kind of vendetta going against him,mainly with regard to Breadman trying to get a particular poster banned.

We all know who I'm talking about,and at the time,I think we all wanted rid of him.
The powers that be gave that particular poster more than enough rope,too much in fact.
I think Breadman is deserving of another few feet,at least.

Sluffy wrote:If he can lose his agendas and he wants to return, then we are happy to give things another go.

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

This is unbelievable.

Let's remember the words of Custer at the Alamo,'I see no ships'.

Now come on.

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here - Page 3 2Q==

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

y2johnny wrote:A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here - Page 3 Giphy-10

How did you get that photo of Cecil?

Chairmanda

Chairmanda
Andy Walker
Andy Walker

Natasha Whittam wrote:
y2johnny wrote:A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here - Page 3 Giphy-10

How did you get that photo of Cecil?
That's not Cecil, unless Tarquin has been leading us both on?

Guest


Guest

Chairmanda wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
y2johnny wrote:A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here - Page 3 Giphy-10

How did you get that photo of Cecil?
That's not Cecil, unless Tarquin has been leading us both on?
They are both my online dating names.....

Wait a minute......

Forget i said anything

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

boltonbonce wrote:This is unbelievable.

Let's remember the words of Custer at the Alamo,'I see no ships'.

Now come on.

What's unbelievable?

That I ban someone who has been posting personal abuse at me for THREE YEARS over a meaningless internet spat!!!

Who wanted to wreck this site and all the heard work numerous people have put into it by setting up another site because he couldn't get his own way on here!

That has started to personally abused someone (on more than one occasion) for not wanting to join this other potential new site.

And all I ask in return for the ban to be lifted is for him to drop the nastiness and bitterness?

What exactly am I missing?

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:
boltonbonce wrote:This is unbelievable.

Let's remember the words of Custer at the Alamo,'I see no ships'.

Now come on.

What's unbelievable?

That I ban someone who has been posting personal abuse at me for THREE YEARS over a meaningless internet spat!!!

Who wanted to wreck this site and all the hard work numerous people have put into it by setting up another site because he couldn't get his own way on here!

That has started to personally abused someone (on more than one occasion) for not wanting to join this other potential new site.

And all I ask in return for the ban to be lifted is for him to drop the nastiness and bitterness?

What exactly am I missing?
Sluffy,I don't know how to tell you this,but here goes...I'm joking.


I hope this helps,and that,given time,you'll once again be able to lead a full and active life.


https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Humour

finlaymcdanger

finlaymcdanger
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Sluffy wrote:
We've had a Breadxit.

You're far far more conniving than I ever gave to credit for, Whittam.

:clap:

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Pathetic. 

It's a Internet forum.

Deal with banter, stop getting wound up about what people you don't even know write and stick your agendas where the sun don't shine.

And ffs stop all this navel gazing about "where it all went wrong" 

It didn't. 
 It's just that some people were being precious and acted like 4 year old spoilt brats. 


We are bwfc fans. F****** start acting like it you pussies.

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

i'm sad about Breaders being banned, I hope after a brief ban he will be welcomed back? Does anyone really believe that Nat and Breaders were going to set up another forum? Personally i don't but his trolling of KP was uncalled for.

Sluffy - mate, you need to start taking your own advice. You are always saying it's just the internet and people you don't know giving you abuse doesn't affect you, well clearly it does. You always say that other sites have been ruined by the owners insistence on being in charge and lording it up over others and i feel you are heading the same way. 
As with Bonceys post above anyone who knows how Boncey posts would take that as humour.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Of course I'm setting up a new form, "Natasha's Nuts".

It's invitation only, so don't expect to ever see it.

Guest


Guest

i'd love to be on your nuts nat..........just not a different forum

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

This is Nats forum logo...


A chatbox to air views, opinions and make things better on here - Page 3 IMG_1215

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Why would I have a photo of you and sluffy playing together as my logo?

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Natasha Whittam wrote:Why would I have a photo of you and sluffy playing together as my logo?
It's the perfect logo. People having fun at your nuts.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum