Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Bolton Wanderers Banter » BWSA AGM and open meeting - This Thursday

BWSA AGM and open meeting - This Thursday

+6
Leeds_Trotter
Norpig
Natasha Whittam
y2johnny
boltonbonce
Sluffy
10 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Reply to topic

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

A well run and organised group of Wanderers supporters, who have followed the team for years and are on good terms with the clubs owner!

Who hold several regular public meetings throughout the year and where people can actually cast a vote to elect its Board and who submit their accounts on time and hold their AGM every year.

No hidden agenda's here.

And what a difference it makes!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

BEN Alnwick and Harry Charsley will be special guests at the Bolton Wanderers Supporters’ Association’s monthly meeting.

The event will be held this Thursday, February 8, at 7.30pm in the Whites Hotel’s Reflections lounge.

Entry is free to members but all fans are welcome to attend, and can join on the night for £5. All tickets must first be registered on [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Alnwick and Charsley will be doing a special Q&A, and will be signing autographs.

The BWSA’s annual general meeting will also take place from 7pm and is open to members only.

Guest


Guest

Sluffy wrote:A well run and organised group of Wanderers supporters, who have followed the team for years and are on good terms with the clubs owner!

Who hold several regular public meetings throughout the year and where people can actually cast a vote to elect its Board and who submit their accounts on time and hold their AGM every year.

No hidden agenda's here.

:facepalm:

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Hahaha, I didn't expect a bite so soon!

Selected editing from you however I see.

Funny how you omitted the last line of my statement that is crucial to the whole context of what I posted -

Sluffy wrote:And what a difference it makes!

I don't think anyone would argue (well except probably you because that's what you do) that there is a whole world of difference between the BWSA and any other similar Wanderers based group out there - and that stems from their raison d'etre (their reason for being).  

One is there to support the club and its current owner (whoever that might be) and the other is to take ownership of the club from when the club falls into Administration.

One is fully behind the club succeeding no matter what - the other benefits when it doesn't.

Big difference wouldn't you agree?

Anyway twelve monthly social meetings at the club with like minded fellow supporters for just a £5 for the year - attended by players, the manager and even the owner from time to time - what's not to like.

If you or anyone else lives' locally and are free on the night then why not get down there?

Guest


Guest

Sluffy, my comment was nothing to do with the merits of the SA over the ST, I'm not interested in either of them. My facepalm was a response to your continued lack of self awareness, which you've confirmed with the essay above.

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

T.R.O.Y wrote:Sluffy, my comment was nothing to do with the merits of the SA over the ST, I'm not interested in either of them. My facepalm was a response to your continued lack of self awareness, which you've confirmed with the essay above.

If you say so.

I will still stick with what I said originally - and which you decided to not fully quote (and thus change its context) for your own reason.

Namely that the BWSA is not after anything other than supporting the club and its current owner (whoever it may be at the time) and therefore spends its time properly organising itself and holding its constitutional AGM every year, receiving its audited accounts on time and arranging a number of meeting with guest attendees - usually from players, the manager or the owner of the club.

On the other hand I can think of another group that has spent its time reporting the club to the EFL (at the time we were facing Winding up action in court!), tried to buy a chunk of the club for a ridiculously small amount of money (that they hadn't even got!) when the club was on its knees financially and employed solicitors to fight the clubs attempt to remove the all inclusive ACV - which they were not successful in with the ACV being lifted on the hotel, offices and car parks etc.

Their Board (which no one has ever yet actually been allowed to physically vote in!) decided to do these actions themselves and decided that they wouldn't hold its constitutionally required AGM (and submission of its annual audited accounts for approval which are normally submitted at AGM time) - without consultation with its membership!

Maybe if they had spent less time attacking the club and more time on supporting it, then they to would be holding its AGM  on time!  

So my original four line 'essay' is factual and fair comment on the administration of the BWSA.

Thank you.

Guest


Guest

All great, but nothing to do with my comment - which was in regards a to you never missing an opportunity to have a dig at the ST. The obsession is a bit ridiculous, and I’m surprised it’s still going given their irrelevance now.

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

T.R.O.Y wrote:All great, but nothing to do with my comment - which was in regards a to you never missing an opportunity to have a dig at the ST. The obsession is a bit ridiculous, and I’m surprised it’s still going given their irrelevance now.
I'm not getting involved.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Very Happy

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

boltonbonce wrote:
T.R.O.Y wrote:All great, but nothing to do with my comment - which was in regards a to you never missing an opportunity to have a dig at the ST. The obsession is a bit ridiculous, and I’m surprised it’s still going given their irrelevance now.
I'm not getting involved.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Very Happy

And posted at a time when I was doing my best to work out a way to replace 'Guest' from your personal thread!

Thanks pal!

Very Happy

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

T.R.O.Y wrote:All great, but nothing to do with my comment - which was in regards a to you never missing an opportunity to have a dig at the ST. The obsession is a bit ridiculous, and I’m surprised it’s still going given their irrelevance now.

Very Happy

You do make me laugh at times.

You didn't half jump at my bait.

To be honest I was trying to promote the good work the BWSA keeps doing by having a laugh at the ST and by using them as a direct comparison.

You yourself decided to edit out my context and have a pop at me.

I thought when I posted it that you might bite in some way.

Seems we both have an obsession then doesn't it - or maybe we both know we are simply playing games just for the hell of it?







boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:
boltonbonce wrote:
T.R.O.Y wrote:All great, but nothing to do with my comment - which was in regards a to you never missing an opportunity to have a dig at the ST. The obsession is a bit ridiculous, and I’m surprised it’s still going given their irrelevance now.
I'm not getting involved.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Very Happy

And posted at a time when I was doing my best to work out a way to replace 'Guest' from your personal thread!

Thanks pal!

Very Happy

flower Very Happy

Guest


Guest

Just expressing in emoji form how I (and I bet most on here) feel when I see you drone on about the ST Sluffy. If you’d like to claim it was ‘bait’ specifically to get a rise out of me that’s fine - doubt anyone’s buying it though!

y2johnny

y2johnny
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

T.R.O.Y wrote:Just expressing in emoji form how I (and I bet most on here) feel when I see you drone on about the ST Sluffy. If you’d like to claim it was ‘bait’ specifically to get a rise out of me that’s fine - doubt anyone’s buying it though!
speak for yourself, i find it entertaining and take it with the pinch of salt that is intended.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Climb out, Johnny.

Guest


Guest

Ye are you gunning for mod status again Johnny?

y2johnny

y2johnny
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

T.R.O.Y wrote:Ye are you gunning for mod status again Johnny?
not at all, not on here enough to warrant it?

But as Boggers is still on here, what is it you are trying to achieve exactly?

y2johnny

y2johnny
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

Natasha Whittam wrote:Climb out, Johnny.
don't worry, i'll be back in you soon Nat!

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

T.R.O.Y wrote:Just expressing in emoji form how I (and I bet most on here) feel when I see you drone on about the ST Sluffy. If you’d like to claim it was ‘bait’ specifically to get a rise out of me that’s fine - doubt anyone’s buying it though!

I didn't aim it at anybody in particular but I did wonder if someone would bite.

I didn't expect one within four minutes though and I guess with you enjoying a pop at me from time to time that it came as no surprise to me that it was you - who just happened to be on Nuts at the time.

As for droning on about the ST all the time, I can't remember when I last mentioned them on Nuts before this - can you?

I didn't even bother bringing it to peoples attention that Bridge was brought back on the quiet to become a Board member again - and thus with Smith/Tetlow and Rigby (who have been more or less been right there from the start) and thus hold a winning block vote over the remaining three Board members on any vote they chose to have.

I agree they have very much made themselves irrelevant these days and will remain so until they resign their positions - even then it might be too late for this ST's credibility long term.




Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

T.R.O.Y wrote:Ye are you gunning for mod status again Johnny?

For what it is worth Johnny, yourself and Boogers have all been offered mod status by Nuts and have all turn them down too!

We would be delighted to have anyone who is interested in becoming a mod to contact us and we will sort something out.

Thank you.

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Imagine Boggers as a mod  Shocked

Leeds_Trotter


El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Sluffy wrote:
T.R.O.Y wrote:Ye are you gunning for mod status again Johnny?

For what it is worth Johnny, yourself and Boogers have all been offered mod status by Nuts and have all turn them down too!

We would be delighted to have anyone who is interested in becoming a mod to contact us and we will sort something out.

Thank you.

::bellend::

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Reply to topic

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Bolton Wanderers Banter » BWSA AGM and open meeting - This Thursday

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum