Bolton Wanderers could be in administration 'within hours'

wanderlust wrote:I could almost puke listening to this sycophantic nonsense. If Anderson offered to pay the full amount when it was due BM wouldn't have had a case to take to court. 

Don't you get it? 

If you can grasp the fundamental concept that he is a liar then perhaps you might finally stop hanging on to his every word.

Does any one of you lickspittles actually know what happened yesterday or what was agreed? 

Or understand the fact that an investor would get far more value if we'd gone into administration and Anderson had never arrived in the first place?

Anderson supporters... the word TOADY was made for you...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

wanderlust wrote:Nixon suggesting there will be some news about something on Sunday. What the hell that means I've no idea but I do hope it includes the words "bought by a US billionaire".

Sluffy wrote:
Some people have set their minds on what Anderson was given a directors ban for in 2005 and clearly thinks he's up to no good here - not only thinks but constantly posts that is why he is here!

However he's been at the club for a couple of years now and even his most sternest critics should by now have accepted that he's turn what was a basket case club totally around has got a number of results both on and off the pitch despite the odds being stack heavily against him.

Credit where credit it is due, but one or two in particular just won't give him any chance whatsoever and would rather the club fail and he be cast out rather than the club prosper under his stewardship.

Give a dog a bad name and never give it another chance. ever, is a moto that some seem to live by unfortunately.

wanderlust wrote:I could almost puke listening to this sycophantic nonsense. If Anderson offered to pay the full amount when it was due BM wouldn't have had a case to take to court.

Don't you get it?

If you can grasp the fundamental concept that he is a liar then perhaps you might finally stop hanging on to his every word.

Does any one of you lickspittles actually know what happened yesterday or what was agreed?

Or understand the fact that an investor would get far more value if we'd gone into administration and Anderson had never arrived in the first place?

Anderson supporters... the word TOADY was made for you...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Sluffy wrote:

Sluffy wrote:
Some people have set their minds on what Anderson was given a directors ban for in 2005 and clearly thinks he's up to no good here - not only thinks but constantly posts that is why he is here!

However he's been at the club for a couple of years now and even his most sternest critics should by now have accepted that he's turn what was a basket case club totally around has got a number of results both on and off the pitch despite the odds being stack heavily against him.

Credit where credit it is due, but one or two in particular just won't give him any chance whatsoever and would rather the club fail and he be cast out rather than the club prosper under his stewardship.

Give a dog a bad name and never give it another chance. ever, is a moto that some seem to live by unfortunately.

wanderlust wrote:I could almost puke listening to this sycophantic nonsense. If Anderson offered to pay the full amount when it was due BM wouldn't have had a case to take to court.

Don't you get it?

If you can grasp the fundamental concept that he is a liar then perhaps you might finally stop hanging on to his every word.

Does any one of you lickspittles actually know what happened yesterday or what was agreed?

Or understand the fact that an investor would get far more value if we'd gone into administration and Anderson had never arrived in the first place?

Anderson supporters... the word TOADY was made for you...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

QED

luckyPeterpiper wrote:What I don't understand about all this business is that BluMarble themselves said they'd agreed a deal weeks ago so why did they suddenly pull out a winding up or admin petition when they already knew what they were getting and when? And why did the court agree to hear the case at all when (so far as all media are reporting) that deal's due date hadn't happened yet? Did I miss something? I'm not being flip by asking, I've been working down in Kent for the last three days and not had any spare time to trawl the 'net etc or watch TV.

Cajunboy wrote:

luckyPeterpiper wrote:What I don't understand about all this business is that BluMarble themselves said they'd agreed a deal weeks ago so why did they suddenly pull out a winding up or admin petition when they already knew what they were getting and when? And why did the court agree to hear the case at all when (so far as all media are reporting) that deal's due date hadn't happened yet? Did I miss something? I'm not being flip by asking, I've been working down in Kent for the last three days and not had any spare time to trawl the 'net etc or watch TV.

What are you doing Hop-picking?

luckyPeterpiper wrote:What I don't understand about all this business is that BluMarble themselves said they'd agreed a deal weeks ago so why did they suddenly pull out a winding up or admin petition when they already knew what they were getting and when? And why did the court agree to hear the case at all when (so far as all media are reporting) that deal's due date hadn't happened yet? Did I miss something? I'm not being flip by asking, I've been working down in Kent for the last three days and not had any spare time to trawl the 'net etc or watch TV.

Sluffy wrote:

luckyPeterpiper wrote:What I don't understand about all this business is that BluMarble themselves said they'd agreed a deal weeks ago so why did they suddenly pull out a winding up or admin petition when they already knew what they were getting and when? And why did the court agree to hear the case at all when (so far as all media are reporting) that deal's due date hadn't happened yet? Did I miss something? I'm not being flip by asking, I've been working down in Kent for the last three days and not had any spare time to trawl the 'net etc or watch TV.

Anderson had said he'd agreed with BM about a deal (I'd seen nothing ever from BM's end?).

What Iles said during his stint yesterday was that BM had agreed with a third party(?) a reduced amount but come settlement time the payment was proposed to be paid in instalments which BM immediately rejected and started the wheels moving for Administration.

The court would obviously wish to hear any legitimate claims of payment default which BM had at that time.  As far as I'm aware numerous dates are scheduled for court action on a given date, with the majority of cases being settled before they actual come before the court - just like what happened here.

Hope you enjoyed your time in Kent, Leeds Castle is a lovely place to visit if you had the time.

Leeds_Trotter wrote:Does anyone have a link to an article where it states that the loan was taken out against the Stadium? Some Anti Anderson idiot is trying to tell me Dean took out the loan against his house! The bloke clearly doesn't have a clue!