Tinket Taylor painfull why?

Drops Wheater when Yeovil have two big forwards Miller n co.Wheater,knight surely.

?
But Knight is bigger than Wheater so you're contradicting yourself. 

Plus when Baps was sent off, Dougie made a brilliant substitution and brought Wheats on - who promptly saved us with a superb block. We would have lost but for that substitution.

Manager's a genius!

Wheater should have been partnering Knight with Ream LB and Hutton RB.Baptiste could have been benched.Sorry if you mis understood.My point was Miller has been I a thorn in a lot of sides higher placed than us and I felt Wheaters power and Knights size would have nullified him.

White84 wrote:Wheater should have been partnering Knight with Ream LB and Hutton RB.Baptiste could have been benched.

But that would involve tinkering? Which I thought, by the title of the thread you were looking to avoid.

haha love the title of this thread, apart from obviously It's got tinket, but it's a good play on words.

To be fair, 50% of the thread title is correct.

Even with tweaks that team should beat a Yeovill .....  a least that what it says on paper.  

terenceanne wrote:Even with tweaks that team should beat a Yeovill .....  a least that what it says on paper.  

Only if you believe the bullshit hype about our senior squad. We really aren't that good.