The weather today

Anyone planning a barbie this evening with it being lovely outside?

Boggersbelief wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:KP told him to fuck off..

My god, hope AD is okay.

So you agree that jake shouldn't have been banned?

sarcasm can be quite tough to read on a forum i suppose

You're a cocky prick aren't you.

And boggers is back.  love you boggers

karlypants wrote:Anyone planning a barbie this evening with it being lovely outside?

More of a roast than a barbie

i've just caught a big fish

Boggersbelief wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:KP told him to fuck off..

My god, hope AD is okay.

So you agree that jake shouldn't have been banned?

If it had been a one off against a normal poster then no.

But Sluffy and AD have a bit of history and I'm sure his return was under conditions. Too many threads end up talking about AD, Breadman and Scott, not saying that's AD's fault but I'm sure that factored in. It's Sluffy's forum (sort of) so he can do as he pleases.

As I said from a personal stand point I don't get much out of AD's contributions so Im really not too bothered.

So what about nats constant abuse to everyone? Surely she should be banned too

Boggersbelief wrote:So what about nats constant abuse to everyone? Surely she should be banned too

Boggersbelief wrote:So what about nats constant abuse to everyone? Surely she should be banned too

He would take his forum with him.

There would be suicides I reckon.

Boggersbelief wrote:So what about nats constant abuse to everyone? Surely she should be banned too

Nat owns the site she can do what she wants.

As I've said though, people can throw around as many insults as they want I really don't care until it gets to the racist shit White84 used to come out with, for me that crosses a line.

First sluffy owns it, now nat. Do you have a clue 74?

Co-owners as far as I'm aware. (Hence I put Sluffy sort of owns it).

Mind-blowing stuff i know.

Boggersbelief wrote:First sluffy owns it, now nat. Do you have a clue 74?

Why you going all serious again now.  You've not been nit-picking for ages yet today your right back on form.

Just admit you don't have a clue.

Bloody 'ell.

I made you lot a thread especially. I'm offended.

I didn't think it really mattered who owned it.

I learn something new everyday.

I'm just giving you what I know, seemingly more than you but don't take it as gospel.

Not sure why you're getting so up tight on here recently, may be worth taking a break.

bwfc1874 wrote:I'm just giving you what I know, seemingly more than you but don't take it as gospel.

Yeah but I'm not claiming to know who owns this site, I'm happy to admit I don't have a clue.

Your turn..

I know Nat is one of the people running the site, I also know Sluffy is.

I'm not sure why you're bothered but I hope this helps to put your mind at rest.

So you don't know who owns it then? Which was my question.

Hahaha is this a joke? Are you so desperate to win an argument today you're going to start nit picking on that?

I've told you what I know, but I think Nat and Sluffy own the site.

Why is this important?

I always win arguments with you. It's easy