Most Annoying Poster 2016

Nat 3 - doff 0

Just saying

y2johnny wrote:Nat 3 - doff 0

Just saying

I'm tempted to vote for her also as she can't make a proper poll.

karlypants wrote:Just a thought Nat, you could have added 'other' if some of us wanted to vote for someone else love but as I said it's just a thought.

Keep your thoughts to yourself.

When they pick BBC Sports Personality of the Year do they offer you an "other" option so you can vote for Liam Trotter?

When Miss World is on do they offer you an "other" option so you can vote for me?

Idiot.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

When they pick BBC Sports Personality of the Year do they offer you an "other" option so you can vote for Liam Trotter?

When Miss World is on do they offer you an "other" option so you can vote for me?

Idiot.

Suspect KP would vote Liam Trotter for miss world before you Nat, as would most.

Fabians Right Peg wrote:Suspect KP would vote Liam Trotter for miss world before you Nat, as would most.

You swine, I have feelings you know.

New year, same old bullery.

Knowing I'm not annoying is a great start to 2017. I feel I can push on to new heights,and reach out to some of the lurkers,in an effort to get them on board.
I've got some great material on belly button fluff,but I'll need a bit of time to put it all together.
Something for you all to look forward to.

Who said you weren't annoying?

Sluffy 8, Boggers 6.

It's going to be close.

boltonbonce wrote:I've got some great material on belly button fluff,but I'll need a bit of time to put it all together.
Something for you all to look forward to.

Makes a change from you know who.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Who said you weren't annoying?

I'm not on the list. Stands to reason I'm universally revered.

The results of this poll have set me thinking.

Is this site like the HMRC one?

The people using it obviously have a strong dislike for the people running it (it would appear).

But the people running it are hardly likely to say "Well, fuck off and don't post then!" because they know it's in their interest to keep their contributors sweet and invite their input?

Just a thought....

We do need some new blood though.

Not fake accounts, real people.

Ba is closed/closing the forum part.  Maybe their 3 members might come over.  Maybe we can start a tns thread in preparation

Face fit testing due in March.

My predecessor used your old company (as previously discussed) but I'm in charge now.

You in?

Free coffee and a bit of poncing about on Nuts in my office.

And possibly cake.

Bread2.0 wrote:Face fit testing due in March.

My predecessor used your old company (as previously discussed) but I'm in charge now.

You in?

Free coffee and a bit of poncing about on Nuts in my office.

And possibly cake.

You had me at free coffee  definitely!!!!  Funnily enough ive been doing a bit of work tonight looking at stuff and bought some new domains to target specific areas.    Might have a job on wednesday and one on friday but dont start back until the 10th officially.  

I'll PM you nearer the time.

Don't rip me off, I've got a budget to protect.

Haha.  If youve been using my previous employer i think you will be pleasantly surprised.

Bread2.0 wrote:The people using it obviously have a strong dislike for the people running it (it would appear).

Appearances are subjective, people can be annoying and get on your nerves, but it does not mean that you don't appreciate the time and effort that goes into providing a forum that for the most part people enjoy.

Last day for voting folks, results revealed after midnight.