[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:On what planet then, does having assets and a small future debt amount to the £231 million and no assets lie you've been spreading around?Man up and accept the fact that you've been lying all along because you desperately want to appear as an authority on these matters, when in reality you're just a sad little muppet.
Look this has got to stop.
I don't need to lie over fuck all on an internet forum like a certain individual.
You posted up that Anderson took on assets of £45m when he took over the club.
An accountant with many years experience posted two links to you from the accounts of the club and Burnden Leisure and said that they would "comprehensively contradict you".
You (being you) replied by saying the assets he inherited was shown to be £9.4m then - he replied "No it wasn't. BWFC didn't have net assets when Anderson and Holdsworth took over. It had net liabilities of £186million at 30 June 2016
which by 30 June 2017 had turned into net assets of £7.3m as a result of Eddie's loan write offs".
You obviously knew better than a man who has spent his entire adult life working in accountancy and posted him a screen shot of the Burnden Leisure Balance Sheet for the June 2017
accounts (Note not the June 2016
accounts you were originally talking about!) to tell him he was misunderstanding your point.
He replied that you were not only looking at Group Balance Sheet but you had completely missed off the creditors due in more than one year.
To which you replied "That's right I am" to which I assume he had taken it as an admission of your mistake or that he was wasting his lifetime of skills and knowledge trying to put you straight.
With your post last night on Wways stating that this respected real life accountant was WRONG in what he had been saying to you, it was clear that you couldn't be told anything - you it seems know better than everyone else.
You have tried to tell a highly respected accountant that Anderson took on a club with £45m in assets over liabilities - to which the accountant (and later myself on here yesterday) proved by reference to the actual accounts that the true and real position at the time Anderson took on the club was that of £186m liabilities more than assets - that is a discrepancy of what you claimed - whether you like it or not - of £231m.
I have no idea why you want to continually be denying factual evidence just to further your own agenda and not to be seen as being wrong. I don't know if it is because you feel can't lose face, you consider yourself too macho to be told anything, or you have some sort of personal issues - but this behaviour simply can not go on - when clearly you are the one in denial about the facts and the reality of the situation as explained to you by someone who is a highly regarded, qualified, and vastly experienced specialist in the field of accountancy.
There's just no point to it really is there?
We've warned you about your abuse before and clearly you haven't wished to hear it, despite a small ban, so have a little longer break and maybe post abuse at the mods and Admin over on Wways like you do here and see how long they will put up with it.