Lusty permanently banned?

@Norpig wrote:Don't judge me but seeing as this site has been so quiet i've been on ww a bit lately and pm'd a few times with Lusty. He passes on his best wishes to all (even Sluffy).

He's under the impression he is permanently banned, is that right? I don't want to be stirring anything up just asking a question.

He's free to post again if he wants but let me make it absolutely clear I'm certainly not here to take the abusive, self-opinionated, argumentative (and often factually wrong) shit from him that he thinks/believes he has a right to post towards me.

I've had enough dealing with trolls recently and similarly I'd had enough dealing with nutjobs like him in the past and that's why he's been having to post on ww for the last few months.

Unsurprisingly he's learnt that he can't say and behave like he did on here, over there - clearly why he's put out feelers to come back.

If he want's to act reasonably on here like the rest of us then he can do but the minute he reverts back to his old ways he'll be gone - and for good this time.

If he (or anyone else) can't accept those conditions then there's no point in him returning.

Thanks Sluffy i'll pass it on to him.

You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

@T.R.O.Y. wrote:You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

You didn't need to post that. You could have just seen Sluffy's good deed for what it was without making something out of it and moved on.

@T.R.O.Y. wrote:You need to drop the victim act Sluffy, anybody who can read has seen enough from you to know it’s not true. Unban everyone and hope some will return. Let’s move on.

I've just said I've had enough of trolls - you hardly post any other time other than to try to wind me up.

If you care to even look back on this very thread I've told you previously that in SEVEN YEARS only THREE people have ever been banned - and Bread has since been unbanned to pay his respects to poor Rammy who told us he was terminally ill (for the record Bread didn't bother) and Wanderlust who was banned at that time (for abuse), allowed back only to continue in the same way, banned yet again and now again free to post also - no more chances though, he's had plenty and never seems to learn from them.

The third person tried to hack into my personal details and post stuff on ww - so clearly he won't be returning.

So it's just consistent bollocks from you yet again to stir the pot and seek a reaction - someone else who seems not to want to learn.

So just to emphasise the point about being serious about dealing with trolling and nutjobs, you've earned yourself a days ban.

If you don't like how the site will be run from now on then don't bother returning.

The sites suffered enough from individuals like you and Wanderlust putting yourselves first and the enjoyment of the rest of us a long way second - and that simply has to stop if we want the forum to survive.

I can't be clearer than that.

Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

@boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

@Sluffy wrote:

@boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

It's in the Rammywhite thread.

Thanks for the confirmation KP.

@karlypants wrote:

@Sluffy wrote:

@boltonbonce wrote:Sluffy, Breadman did pay his respects to Rammy.

Fair enough then, he certainly didn't post them on the thread along with everyone else, nor anywhere else on the forum and that was what I was referring to.

It's in the Rammywhite thread.

No, we are talking about two different things.

Bread's ban was lifted so he could communicate with Rammy on his sad prognosis and in effect say his goodbye to him along with the rest of us - he didn't bother - and that was the point I was making.

Yes, he did post on the thread of Rammy's daughter announcing his passing, which you correctly refer to.

Still the original point I was making stands - namely Bread isn't banned, nor anyone else bar one - and he attempted to hack into my personal and family life!

I find this rather unseemly. I'm going for a lie down.

@boltonbonce wrote:I find this rather unseemly. I'm going for a lie down.

For what it's worth. I emailed Breadman at the time, and he was in Spain, with limited internet access.

He asked me to pass on his best wishes to Rammy, which I did.

Have a nice day.

I've messaged Lusty and let him know he can come back. maybe ask Breaders if he fancies coming back Boncey?

@Norpig wrote:I've messaged Lusty and let him know he can come back. maybe ask Breaders if he fancies coming back Boncey?

I do believe he was offered to come back in the past but Boncey mentioned that he had moved on from forums.

@karlypants wrote:

I do believe he was offered to come back in the past but Boncey mentioned that he had moved on from forums.

Yes, you never know though. Wonder what happened to RT?

@boltonbonce wrote:

@karlypants wrote:

I do believe he was offered to come back in the past but Boncey mentioned that he had moved on from forums.

Yes, you never know though. Wonder what happened to RT?

Good question.

And Lusty is back! Good to see you on here again 

@Norpig wrote:And Lusty is back! Good to see you on here again 

Is he packing heat?

@boltonbonce wrote:
Is he packing heat?

No he's just really excited to be back i think.

Just checking in to make sure you're all playing nicely.

@wanderlust wrote:Just checking in to make sure you're all playing nicely.

Of course, like one big happy family on here, not sure which one would be Uncle knobhead though?

@Norpig wrote:

Of course, like one big happy family on here, not sure which one would be Uncle knobhead though?

Looking increasingly like one small happy family for some reason.

Don't think I can be Uncle Knobhead though as I already have a role to play as Glos's personal grapes of wrath.

I thought Glos's personal grapes of wrath were his haemorrhoids.

@xmiles wrote:I thought Glos's personal grapes of wrath were his haemorrhoids.

Nah you're alright Wander. Good to see you back, you old scrote 

XM, it sometimes feels as though Hemorrhoids are just about the only thing that isn't wrong 

@gloswhite wrote:
Nah you're alright Wander. Good to see you back, you old scrote 

XM, it sometimes feels as though Hemorrhoids are just about the only thing that isn't wrong 

Scrotum the butler aka the wrinkly old retainer.....

Yeah it's nice to hear these dulcet tones wafting across time and space again and I hope you and yours - indeed everyone on Nuts - are safe and well.

@karlypants wrote:

You didn't need to post that. You could have just seen Sluffy's good deed for what it was without making something out of it and moved on.

That's my point though mate, it's not the 'good deed' he's framed it as. Lust shouldn't have been banned in the first place, all im doing is pointing that out.

Anyway, welcome back Lust!

@T.R.O.Y. wrote:

That's my point though mate, it's not the 'good deed' he's framed it as. Lust shouldn't have been banned in the first place, all im doing is pointing that out.

Anyway, welcome back Lust!

Cheers Troy. See you've been holding the fort admirably 

@T.R.O.Y. wrote:

@karlypants wrote:

You didn't need to post that. You could have just seen Sluffy's good deed for what it was without making something out of it and moved on.

That's my point though mate, it's not the 'good deed' he's framed it as. Lust shouldn't have been banned in the first place, all im doing is pointing that out.

Anyway, welcome back Lust!

I didn't frame it as a good deed though because it wasn't.

And yes Wanderlust most definitely should have been banned previously - and was - several times now - because neither I nor anyone else are here to be subjected to abuse, let alone over the length of time he continued to do so.

He was allowed back on the simple proviso that he packs it in and posts like the rest of us.

It's not gone without notice the little asides he's already made about expecting 'madness', 'uncle knobhead' and now 'holding the fort admirably'.

Early signs he will not be lasting long as its beginning to look as though he's not willing to change his behaviour to fit in with everyone else - which I seem to need to spell out would also include myself.

I've said for an awful long time now that the site has suffered because a certain one or two have put their selves ahead of the site and everyone else on it.  It's been killing the site - maybe even has killed it - so I no longer need to tolerate it anymore as we may or may not be dead now but we definitely will be if it is allowed to continue unabated - there's nothing to be lost anymore by getting rid of the couple or so who decide to refuse to fit in with the rest of us left on here.

I don't need to remind people that tellingly we survived ok without Wanderlust (and Bread before that) when he had his latest 3 month break or so away from Nuts and I've no doubt we will do so again without him if need be. It was he who asked to return here - not the other way around.

Consider it the 'new normal' on here from now on, if you want to be part of Nuts then great but if you simply want Nuts for your platform to do whatever you please for your own amusement/self justification/vendettas, or whatever it is that makes you think you are somehow entitled to behave in the way you do to the detriment of the rest of us and the site, then you won't be lasting long on here anymore.

I really should not need to be asking grown men to simply behave reasonably - they/you should know that already.

Clearly one or two require a reminder though.