Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Wandering Minds » Should a Coronavirus vaccine be mandatory?

Should a Coronavirus vaccine be mandatory?

+7
xmiles
wanderlust
Sluffy
Cajunboy
BoltonTillIDie
gloswhite
boltonbonce
11 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 4]

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

T.R.O.Y. wrote:What a load of rubbish that is. Why are you going after BTID all of a sudden? He’s done nothing to you.

???

What are you talking about?

I replied to him as I would to anybody who posted what he had on the thread.

He posted that something I posted unscientifically and without any credence, in fun was too high a percentage and I replied to try to show that he himself was one of those who had clearly believed in the social media 'conspiracy' theories, in his case in regards to Anderson.

I was trying to point out it certainly isn't a fact that he did anything illegal and as he neither knows Anderson personally then he can only be basing his opinion of him on other peoples hearsay, which in this day and age is usually from social media and no longer the man at the pub.

As I've said above ironically he seemed to prove the very point I was making in jest!



Last edited by Sluffy on Thu Aug 20 2020, 13:56; edited 1 time in total

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I do know the difference Sluffy, it’s simply a typo.  It as Wink nothing to do with even you, with dyslexia knowing the difference.

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

It doesnt prove anything, you posted what you thought would be the percentage of conspiracy theory believers, I simply said that was too high.  I know you was just guesstimating, I know you didn’t complete a survey.  But for you to then say clearly I’m one of those people is utter bull shit.  And because I don’t like Ken or the way he treated the club, meant I was a believer in conspiracy theories and one of the mindless few.  Stupid assumptions you make and I will put you straight on what you think I am or am not.  You’ll be calling me a troll soon because I don’t agree with you...

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

This site gets better and better, Mods arguing with each other now  Very Happy

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

::mad::

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

BoltonTillIDie wrote:It doesnt prove anything, you posted what you thought would be the percentage of conspiracy theory believers, I simply said that was too high.  I know you was just guesstimating, I know you didn’t complete a survey.  But for you to then say clearly I’m one of those people is utter bull shit.  And because I don’t like Ken or the way he treated the club, meant I was a believer in conspiracy theories and one of the mindless few.  Stupid assumptions you make and I will put you straight on what you think I am or am not.  You’ll be calling me a troll soon because I don’t agree with you...

You missed the point completely at the start, I was simply having a laugh with Cajun.

Clearly what I said about how you view Anderson based on hearsay ironically backed up what I was saying in that post!

I don't care what you or anyone believes in quite frankly, I was simply pointing out that you had no factual basis to come to the conclusion you had - which was shared by about 99% of everybody else stating a view of him on social media.

Seems that nearly a year after he left what I'd been saying seems to have turned out to be the true position after all.

I'm not looking for plaudits for seemingly being right and I'm not gloating at others for now looking likely to be being wrong, I'm just merely pointing out how social media clearly does influence people who seem to accept what they read as being the truth of the matter.

Fantastically well done for you if you came to the opinion you did without reference to, or influence from, social media.

Still appears to be factually the wrong one though although clearly you will never change your mind about it.

As they say you can lead a horse to water...

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

karlypants wrote:::mad::
Have a word KP and sort them out  Very Happy

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Norpig wrote:
karlypants wrote:::mad::
Have a word KP and sort them out  Very Happy
I’m going to bang their heads together. Very Happy

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

karlypants wrote:
I’m going to bang their heads together. Very Happy
Can you stream that on Nuts TV please?

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

Been away for a week in Germany, and when I come back, its the same old shite. Roll on the start of the new season.

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I’ll leave it there.  We’ll agree to disagree.

xmiles

xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Jay Jay Okocha

gloswhite wrote:Been away for a week in Germany, and when I come back, its the same old shite. Roll on the start of the new season.

Smile

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Norpig wrote:
karlypants wrote:
I’m going to bang their heads together. Very Happy
Can you stream that on Nuts TV please?
It would be ppv.

I would make a killing! Very Happy

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:

As someone who has dyslexia all his life, I appreciate the spell check function on this site and always read back every post I write to see if it reads ok and if there are any obvious mistakes in it.

I'm far from perfect on spelling and grammar but even I know the difference between 'your' and you're'.

If people can't be arsed reading back what they have written before posting it then why should anybody be arsed reading it when they do?
And yet you’ve never mastered the difference between “as” and “has”.

Not that I’m bothered about your spelling mistakes and grammatical errors - just think it’s not a line of argument you should pursue.

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Always one to keep stoking the fire. :facepalm:

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

karlypants wrote:Always one to keep stoking the fire. :facepalm:

Exactly Karly.

He's a bad loser is the top and bottom of it, I've met his type before.

They seem incapable of moving on and carry a grudge around with them.

Any little opportunity they see to have a little dig they will do.

We had ALL moved on from this yet he still wanted his little pop at me.

It says more about him than about anything else but he is unable to see it that way.



okocha

okocha
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Anybody want to see a simple way to ensure correct use of apostrophes?   (No...didn't think so!)

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:

Exactly Karly.

He's a bad loser is the top and bottom of it, I've met his type before.

They seem incapable of moving on and carry a grudge around with them.

Any little opportunity they see to have a little dig they will do.

We had ALL moved on from this yet he still wanted his little pop at me.

It says more about him than about anything else but he is unable to see it that way.



Stoking the fire? Just pointing out the bleedin’ obvious. If you haven’t got the grace to admit you were pontificating about something you do regularly yourself then deflect away. Still looks like a pot / kettle scenario and just because I mentioned an inconvenient fact, it can’t in any way be construed as “having a pop” at you. It’s just a fact.

And FYI I haven’t lost anything as far as I’m aware.

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

karlypants wrote:Always one to keep stoking the fire. :facepalm:
I meant no discourtesy in pointing out the obvious flaw to the argument but by taking this somewhat twisted perspective, you are simply rattling Sluffy’s cage so please stop “stoking the fire” yourself.

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

wanderlust wrote:
Sluffy wrote:
Exactly Karly.

He's a bad loser is the top and bottom of it, I've met his type before.

They seem incapable of moving on and carry a grudge around with them.

Any little opportunity they see to have a little dig they will do.

We had ALL moved on from this yet he still wanted his little pop at me.

It says more about him than about anything else but he is unable to see it that way.

Stoking the fire? Just pointing out the bleedin’ obvious. If you haven’t got the grace to admit you were pontificating about something you do regularly yourself then deflect away. Still looks like a pot / kettle scenario and just because I mentioned an inconvenient fact, it can’t in any way be construed as “having a pop” at you. It’s just a fact.

And FYI I haven’t lost anything as far as I’m aware.

Exactly as predicted!

No you're never wrong about anything are you...

Ever...

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 4]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum