@boltonbonce wrote:
That got me thrown off Blockbusters.

@boltonbonce wrote:
That got me thrown off Blockbusters.
Unblock the 3 and just add nine bob, you know it makes sense.@Natasha Whittam wrote:I've already got 3 people on 'block', I don't see half the shite that's posted on here now.
If I block Bonce then there's the other half.
@Norpig wrote:Unblock the 3 and just add nine bob, you know it makes sense.
Charmed I'm sure.@Norpig wrote:
F. Fuck off Bob
Good man, just need the rest of us to do it now@gloswhite wrote:Mr Pig, followed your suggestion, and he's now blocked for me. This is a good day
@boltonbonce wrote:Looks like it's just you, Bob.
I do. But as you see in the film, attitudes flip. It goes both ways. Great film though.@Sluffy wrote:
You do realise that in the film that the man who stood alone in face of all the others was proved right in the end and the rest who wanted to send the innocent man to the electric chair, were wrong don't you!
![]()
I reckon the name 'Vince' would pop up now and again. We could start a new comp. Bob Bingo.@okocha wrote:I'm having much more fun being unable to see Bob's comments and trying to guess what they might be. Probably can't do him justice though, no matter how low I sink....
And this thought you can keep to yourself.@Sluffy wrote:I can't stop people behaving how they want to (within reason obviously) but don't you (aimed generally and no one in specific) think it's getting a little bit like bullying now?
Bob's obviously has his views on us (again aimed generally and no one in specific) and clearly isn't be going to change them but giving it back and now shunning him like this, isn't that a bit childish and petty thing to be doing too?
Who gives a fuck what he things of us really? (aimed generally and no one in specific).
Just give him the odd nod of acknowledgement and keep in your respective corners and carry on as men are supposed to do and not as a group of mean schoolboys (aimed generally, etc).
Just a thought.
@Natasha Whittam wrote:So he can be rude to us, but not us to him?
You're a bit of an enigma at times Sluffy. You rant and rave at other posters, Wander being a fine example, about things the rest of us barely recognise, and then you go all High and Mighty to protect an openly abusive poster, and when we all complain about his manner, and respond to an obvious troll you call us childish. As you say yourself Sluffy, if you don't agree with it,don't get involved.@Sluffy wrote:
I saw it more as ganging up.
Just thought it was wrong and more than a little childish.
Fwiw I think both sides are out of order but if you're going to have an internet spat then do it man to man rather than being the 'gang' he accused you of all being.
In an ironic way you are proving the point he's been making in some ways.
Anyway I've had my say, I'll let you all sort it out between yourselves, after school, behind the bike shed.
You can hide on the internet now, but I doubt even Bread could concoct a character like Bob.@gloswhite wrote:Sluffy would know it was Breaders, and I doubt he would be so supportive of him.
Its all your fault, Sluffy. Well that's what some of the lynch mob types, the fruitcakes and the blockheads think. But its up to you. I'm not bothered. I don't want to breathe the same air as these people. Just saying like.@gloswhite wrote:Agreed
As your punishment you're getting Bob Holness's take on interior design...@boltonbonce wrote:
That got me thrown off Blockbusters.
@gloswhite wrote:You're a bit of an enigma at times Sluffy. You rant and rave at other posters, Wander being a fine example, about things the rest of us barely recognise, and then you go all High and Mighty to protect an openly abusive poster, and when we all complain about his manner, and respond to an obvious troll you call us childish. As you say yourself Sluffy, if you don't agree with it,don't get involved.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|