Home
1 - I made the point the intelligence is formed from an accumulation of knowledge and experience and not simply from someone's looks. You can look beautiful and still be as dumb as dog shit and Einstein was hardly a looker was he and he was a genius.
2- You can have free accounts and I am referring to how we identify each other on here, you are posting under the okocha account, I am posting under the Sluffy account.
3 - A person can register under multiple accounts and post seemingly as separate people - for example the Natasha, xmiles and okocha accounts may be seen to be by others three completely different individuals when the reality could be they are the same person who uses these multiple accounts to manipulate and play people in an attempt to achieve whatever their aim is.
This I see as playing games.
As long as these 'games' do not get out of hand then there isn't a problem although personally I've never liked the potential to deceive which is inherent from fake accounts.
As I am somehow renowned for and even ridiculed because of it, the fact is that all this is done on the internet which of course isn't to be taken seriously but unfortunately plenty do.
If Nuts fails, and it's been on it's knees for ages, then where are those who have spent years playing these games going to go to continue them? If they want to remain doing so on BWFC forums then they won't last long on ww and with tw being the antithesis to ww in my opinion, then I can't see you going down a storm there either.
I would have thought it would be in everyone's mutual interest to stop the games (and that includes Wanderlust) and allow Nuts to heal - but what do I know?
I'm sure people will continue to do exactly what they want because they always know better of course.
As I keep saying I'll stand back and let you all get on with it because my way is clearly seen to be the problem rather than the solution.
If people want fake accounts, being played and manipulated for someone else's amusement and fed fake facts, and to arbitrarily ban whoever they don't like, then who am I to deny them it?
2- You can have free accounts and I am referring to how we identify each other on here, you are posting under the okocha account, I am posting under the Sluffy account.
3 - A person can register under multiple accounts and post seemingly as separate people - for example the Natasha, xmiles and okocha accounts may be seen to be by others three completely different individuals when the reality could be they are the same person who uses these multiple accounts to manipulate and play people in an attempt to achieve whatever their aim is.
This I see as playing games.
As long as these 'games' do not get out of hand then there isn't a problem although personally I've never liked the potential to deceive which is inherent from fake accounts.
As I am somehow renowned for and even ridiculed because of it, the fact is that all this is done on the internet which of course isn't to be taken seriously but unfortunately plenty do.
If Nuts fails, and it's been on it's knees for ages, then where are those who have spent years playing these games going to go to continue them? If they want to remain doing so on BWFC forums then they won't last long on ww and with tw being the antithesis to ww in my opinion, then I can't see you going down a storm there either.
I would have thought it would be in everyone's mutual interest to stop the games (and that includes Wanderlust) and allow Nuts to heal - but what do I know?
I'm sure people will continue to do exactly what they want because they always know better of course.
As I keep saying I'll stand back and let you all get on with it because my way is clearly seen to be the problem rather than the solution.
If people want fake accounts, being played and manipulated for someone else's amusement and fed fake facts, and to arbitrarily ban whoever they don't like, then who am I to deny them it?
Last edited by Sluffy on Wed Jan 13 2021, 18:50; edited 1 time in total
