Why Do People Hide On Nuts?

Spoil sport. Ill throw in a 5 pound voucher for bargain booze

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

I THOUGHT YOU WAS GIVING IT A REST YOU FECKING WINDGE BAG.

Bwfc1958 wrote:
For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

My friend is a policewoman. She tells me stuff that only the police would know. Doesn't make me a policewoman.

At the end of the day the mods run the site as they see fit. If people aren't happy they can post elsewhere, but the best way to move on from this is not get involved in anymore spats. We all support the same team FFS.

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

I THOUGHT YOU WAS GIVING IT A REST YOU FECKING WINDGE BAG.

Piss off magoo. The owner asked me a question and this is the first chance I've had to answer it. Also, it was 1874 who said that, not me.

y2johnny wrote:Spoil sport.  Ill throw in a 5 pound voucher for bargain booze

You're on! 

That's a bit of a mahusive fucking u-turn from what you tried doing about an hour ago with your last post, Nat.

(The one that you subsequently deleted when I responded to it.)

What's brought about the change of heart?

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

I THOUGHT YOU WAS GIVING IT A REST YOU FECKING WINDGE BAG.

Piss off magoo. The owner asked me a question and this is the first chance I've had to answer it. Also, it was 1874 who said that, not me.

Faggot

Magoo, go and eat your caramelised sausage before it gets cold!

How rude, looks like i got my 1958 & 1874 mixed up stupid names.

Mr Magoo wrote:How rude, looks like i got my 1958 & 1874 mixed up stupid names.

You'd have thought you'd have learnt your lesson after that mix up with your last girlfriends date of birth.

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

I THOUGHT YOU WAS GIVING IT A REST YOU FECKING WINDGE BAG.

Piss off magoo. The owner asked me a question and this is the first chance I've had to answer it. Also, it was 1874 who said that, not me.

Faggot

Homophobic slurs would be better left behind if we're turning over a new leaf.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Mr Magoo wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:This forum has gone to the dogs in a matter of weeks, worse still, it's just been left to unravel. It's only a month or two since this site was running decent, interesting threads worth getting involved with and now, I'm sorry to say, it's a pile of shite. Shitty, tedious threads, with pointless, idiotic comments. There was a chance to keep the status quo not so long ago, when the place was ok. Now it's fucked. Can't see the point any more.

So you're put in charge, what would you do?

For a kick off, If someone was banned for being a complete tosser, they would stay banned. If they came back with a new name, I would ban them again and even if I was considering letting them come back it certainly wouldn't be at the expense of other posters or the quality of the forum.

When 1874 pointed out that you said you would walk if scott came back, you said that was before you knew the whole story. 
So why don't you tell everyone the whole story so they understand?
More to the point, why are you privy to the whole story if you are not, as you say,one of the site owners?

I THOUGHT YOU WAS GIVING IT A REST YOU FECKING WINDGE BAG.

Piss off magoo. The owner asked me a question and this is the first chance I've had to answer it. Also, it was 1874 who said that, not me.

Faggot

Homophobic slurs would be better left behind if we're turning over a new leaf.

Shut up you arse bandit.

Magoo are you seriously 49?

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Magoo are you seriously 49?

49 weeks old, yes!

18 really

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Magoo are you seriously 49?

What are you trying to say, stop being an uptight old man.

Natasha Whittam wrote:It's all very well people moaning about the current content, but any forum content is lead by the members. The simple fact is the majority of posters on here would rather talk bollocks about what they had for tea than about BWFC. In fact I'd go as far as saying that both Magoo's eating habits and Bruce Forsyth are more popular than BWFC on this site.

Perhaps those moaning about the content could step up and start these interesting threads they crave.

 Very good point Nat!

BTW I'm having curry tonight

If we spoke about the team only, this would be a very boring and short-lived forum.

Christ on a bike is all this still going on? I was at a funeral for an old friend yesterday, he was only 42 and died on New Years Eve from Cancer and i come back on here to find the usual childish bollocks being regurgitated over and over again, get a grip before this forum goes down the pan.