Yet another Religious atrocity

Boggersbelief wrote:73 for 73

Hipster_Nebula wrote:I'd challenge that's it's caring to say women must cover their head or worse face, that homosexuality is a sin and the punishment for leaving the faith is death. 

Again I can't test every Muslims opinions on these teachings but I've seen many skirt the issues in televised debates. So they obviously don't have certainty. 

And again these teachings, are commanded by God and his last and true prophet so I don't understand any Muslim who would put that to one side and still consider themselves religious.

karlypants wrote:Man brazenly parading ISIS flag outside Big Ben is stopped by police... but then allowed to walk free as they rule he ISN'T breaking the law

Reebok Trotter wrote:He should have been arrested under the public order act for behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. Allowing him to go about his business unchallenged is a cop-out and a gross insult to anybody whose has lost loved ones at the hands of these barbaric cave dwellers.

Public Order Act - Section 5

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which [F1a] constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

karlypants wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:He should have been arrested under the public order act for behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. Allowing him to go about his business unchallenged is a cop-out and a gross insult to anybody whose has lost loved ones at the hands of these barbaric cave dwellers.

This is exactly what I was thinking.

Public Order Act - Section 5

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which [F1a] constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Hope the officer is getting fucked over it, as it is clearly not acceptable!

bwfc1874 wrote:You can't arrest somebody for showing something we don't like, welcome to a 'free' society.

bwfc1874 wrote:I have rocks for brains.

y2johnny wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:I have rocks for brains.

Quoted just this bit in case i ever need it