20% Pepsi Price Increase? Feck Off!

doffcocker wrote:On average, I'd pay about £6 for a bottle of wine.

doffcocker wrote:Why should us classy drinkers

Ha ha, £6 is classy?

You utter bellend.

karlypants wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Why drink that crap when you can drink Irn Bru.
Doesn't make sense.

It's only for Scottish people that Bonce, Hipster has it coming through his taps at home.

Plus it's made from rusty girders! 

Diet coke for me BTW!

I drink it all the time,and it's not done me any harm.

DC, you are doing something wrong.

You can pick up a bottle of Hardys or wolf blass for a fiver!

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:
2. Pepsi... over Coke? Come on, sort it out.

Possibly the most misguided thing you've ever posted.

Pepsi is the cola king. Everyone knows it.

You tell him nat. I wouldn't clean the toilet with coke (which apparently its very good for)

Natasha Whittam wrote:

doffcocker wrote:On average, I'd pay about £6 for a bottle of wine.

doffcocker wrote:Why should us classy drinkers

Ha ha, £6 is classy?

You utter bellend.

I won't go into what I spend on wine, not least because I owe money to another poster.

But I will say you don't always get what you pay for. Classy drinkers shop around.

doffcocker wrote:

I won't go into what I spend on wine, not least because I owe money to another poster.

You did a runner after KP blew you behind Bargain Booze?

That's shady.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

doffcocker wrote:

I won't go into what I spend on wine, not least because I owe money to another poster.

You did a runner after KP blew you behind Bargain Booze?

That's shady.

Breadman wrote:I can't believe I'm going to say this but Whittam's right.

Pepsi beats Coke all day long.

But Pepsi Max is shit - I'd rather drink water.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

Coke is a million times better tasting than Pepsi.

Pepsi = shit
Coke = nice

No more needs to be said. I am correct. FACT.

I'm an Irn Bru man,but if it came to a choice between Pepsi or Coke,then it would have to be Coke.

boltonbonce wrote:I'm an Irn Bru man,but if it came to a choice between Pepsi or Coke,then it would have to be the nostril candy hands down.

Tut tut

Can't stand self-righteous gits that insist on drinking full fat pop on the basis that "it tastes better than diet/zero carb versions of the same drink" - usually the same fat bastards that insist on having full fat milk or "proper butter" - if only to have a go at people who have actually learnt something from history.

Now I can laugh that they are being taxed for the privilege.

Self Righteousness Tax - great idea!

wanderlust wrote:Can't stand self-righteous gits that insist on drinking full fat pop on the basis that "it tastes better than diet/zero carb versions of the same drink" - usually the same fat bastards that insist on having full fat milk or "proper butter" - if only to have a go at people who have actually learnt something from history.

You utter bellend. What a dull life you must lead if you'd rather drink something tasteless than experience the highs of proper Pepsi.

I drink plenty of Pepsi and I bet I can run 5 miles in a third of the time it takes you.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

I drink plenty of Pepsi and I bet I can run 5 miles in a third of the time it takes you.

It wouldn't surprise me that with the lengths you have to go to, to get custom with you being on the game and all that.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:Can't stand self-righteous gits that insist on drinking full fat pop on the basis that "it tastes better than diet/zero carb versions of the same drink" - usually the same fat bastards that insist on having full fat milk or "proper butter" - if only to have a go at people who have actually learnt something from history.

You utter bellend. What a dull life you must lead if you'd rather drink something tasteless than experience the highs of proper Pepsi.

I drink plenty of Pepsi and I bet I can run 5 miles in a third of the time it takes you.

Easy, Easy....

Most dieticians and nutritionists advise against going for low fat options because people fall into the trap of thinking "Ah, it's low fat, so I can have loads!", when in actual fact, it's not low fat, it's just slightly lower than the full fat option.

Breadman wrote:Most dieticians and nutritionists advise against going for low fat options because people fall into the trap of thinking "Ah, it's low fat, so I can have loads!", when in actual fact, it's not low fat, it's just slightly lower than the full fat option.

Interesting logic akin to saying don't exercise in case you fall into the trap of overdoing it. Safest to do nothing eh?

Er, not really, no.......

Companies want to keep their diet version of a product the same taste so some of the ingredients are substituted for less calorific ones and other ingredients added to retain the same taste as the full fat version.

The question you should be asking yourself is that are the extra added ingredients in the diet version better for your health than the full fat version!

karlypants wrote:Companies want to keep their diet version of a product the same taste so some of the ingredients are substituted for less calorific ones and other ingredients added to retain the same taste as the full fat version.

The question you should be asking yourself is that are the extra added ingredients in the diet version better for your health than the full fat version!

"Leading scientists" say Aspartame increases average lifespan by 5 years and erection maintenance by 50%. In the interest of balance I would point out that some may disagree.