Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Strong rumours

+18
Bwfc1958
bwfc71
karlypants
boltonbonce
Mr Magoo
Jack Russell
Soul Kitchen
finlaymcdanger
Chairmanda
rammywhite
Hipster_Nebula
Alf Hooker
Norpig
wanderlust
Sluffy
scottjames30
luckyPeterpiper
FullofSprite
22 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Reply to topic

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 6]

41Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:34

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Norpig wrote:
rammywhite wrote:
Norpig wrote:it's like the bloody apprentice on here at the moment  Very Happy

It's on in half an hour- a set of  juvenile arrogant incompetent overblown gobshites

not a fan then Rammy?  Very Happy

Actually I like it for its cringe factor!!

42Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:39

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Johnny applied to go on it. What a show that could have been. Very Happy

43Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:44

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

i bet his business plan involved food in some way

44Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:44

Chairmanda

Chairmanda
Andy Walker
Andy Walker

rammywhite wrote:
Breadman wrote:I think it's pretty standard practice, isn't it?

Yes it is- it's what most accountants suggest to their smaller clients who trade from their domestic addresses. Accountants can charge a fee for it. From a tax perspective it's actually better to have your home address as the registered office as you can charge a proportion of your domestic expenses against profits.
but then you have to have change of use planning permission to run a business and pay extra insurance and pay capital gains tax when you come to sell up on the bit you used for business purposes as its not then your primary residence....it gets this complex for individuals and small businesses, heaven only knows what the different ta vehicles are used between all the holding companies, Isle of man, bermuda etc etc

45Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:45

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Norpig wrote:i bet his business plan involved food in some way
He wanted some money for his own KFC franchise, I'm sure!!! Very Happy

46Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:47

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

i think i'll stay skiving for the NHS, all this business talk goes right over my head  Very Happy

47Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:48

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Where Johnny by the way? I'm missing his input.

48Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:49

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I've been wondering the same. Sad

49Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:51

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Breadman wrote:Not necessarily.

My Ltd company was registered at my accountant's address for years, Sluff.

It means nowt.

What I was trying to say was that if some small accountancy place in Essex is their 'local' accountant, then then the person behind the company has a fair chance of being local to there too?

Seemed a reasonable assumption I thought.

But since then I've remembered that Holdsworth recently managed clubs in Essex and there is a good chance that that is where the link probably stems from.

So yes you are right - it isn't really interesting news that I found at all!

Very Happy

50Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 20:53

Guest


Guest

A bit like my revelation that ED isn't on the Board at the V&A...... Very Happy

51Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 21:03

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

It's about £30 to set up but as you say done last week.

52Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 21:10

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Chairmanda wrote:
rammywhite wrote:
Breadman wrote:I think it's pretty standard practice, isn't it?

Yes it is- it's what most accountants suggest to their smaller clients who trade from their domestic addresses. Accountants can charge a fee for it. From a tax perspective it's actually better to have your home address as the registered office as you can charge a proportion of your domestic expenses against profits.
but then you have to have change of use planning permission to run a business and pay extra insurance and pay capital gains tax when you come to sell up on the bit you used for business purposes as its not then your primary residence....it gets this complex for individuals and small businesses, heaven only knows what the different ta vehicles are used between all the holding companies, Isle of man, bermuda etc etc

It still remains your primary residence and any capital gain is apportioned on the basis of the number of rooms less kitchens and toilets. It would be very rare to pay any CGT. I've traded from home for decades as a limited company- from the spare bedroom. No change of use, no insurance complications either. Simply apportioned bills. It's actually not as complicated as it sounds

53Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Has the takeover took place, yet? Wed Dec 16 2015, 21:18

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

this seems very interesting from Companies House........


Name & Registered Office:
SPORTS SHIELD BWFC LIMITED
 THE RETREAT 406 RODDING LANE SOUTH
WOODFORD GREEN
ESSEX
UNITED KINGDOM
IG8 8EY
Company No. 09910069

Are we Bolton fans not being told something?

54Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 21:51

Bwfc1958

Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!

Wow. Reading through this thread has given me a bloody headache. Some of you on here really know your shit regarding business and finance.

55Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:00

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff

bwfc71 wrote:this seems very interesting from Companies House........


Name & Registered Office:
SPORTS SHIELD BWFC LIMITED
 THE RETREAT 406 RODDING LANE SOUTH
WOODFORD GREEN
ESSEX
UNITED KINGDOM
IG8 8EY
Company No. 09910069

Are we Bolton fans not being told something?
very fishy

56Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:03

Guest


Guest

Kin 'ell.....we're going round in circles here.

See Comment #32.

57Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:12

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Has anyone noticed sports shield have registered a new company with BWFC in the company name

58Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:12

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

if we use the possible new company name, would we be the SS BWFC ? 

Cue comments about Titanic, and a manager to steer the ship into calmer waters, ship under full sail, etc.  Very Happy

At the moment, the Marie Celeste springs to mind, with no crew in sight.

59Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:19

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

60Strong rumours  - Page 3 Empty Re: Strong rumours Wed Dec 16 2015, 22:30

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

rammywhite wrote:
Chairmanda wrote:
rammywhite wrote:
Breadman wrote:I think it's pretty standard practice, isn't it?

Yes it is- it's what most accountants suggest to their smaller clients who trade from their domestic addresses. Accountants can charge a fee for it. From a tax perspective it's actually better to have your home address as the registered office as you can charge a proportion of your domestic expenses against profits.
but then you have to have change of use planning permission to run a business and pay extra insurance and pay capital gains tax when you come to sell up on the bit you used for business purposes as its not then your primary residence....it gets this complex for individuals and small businesses, heaven only knows what the different ta vehicles are used between all the holding companies, Isle of man, bermuda etc etc

It still remains your primary residence and any capital gain is apportioned on the basis of the number of rooms less kitchens and toilets. It would be very rare to pay any CGT. I've traded from home for decades as a limited company- from the spare bedroom. No change of use, no insurance complications either. Simply apportioned bills. It's actually not as complicated as it sounds
This is Accountant speak and quite right too Smile 
I believe certain types of distinct offices within the same grounds e.g. converted farm outbuildings would be more likely to require change of use if converting from agricultural to commercial use, but a home office converted from residential use e.g. an existing garage wouldn't attract attention.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 6]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Reply to topic

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum