That's patently untrue Bread. If he was just in it for the money he could have written none of the debt off and when the club was closed down he'd get paid back at least half of his £185 million from the sale of assets.Breadman wrote:
This £15 million's got nothing to do with "protecting" the club, it's all about how much he can squeeze out of the club before he finally gets hounded out.
I also find it difficult to quibble over him asking for future payments and tax breaks after the vast fortune his already given the club.
And now he's given even more concessions to keep the club going - and that's EDs primary interest if the evidence is to be believed.