We're 1-0 down. Half an hour still to play. The crowd's getting restless, and so starts the chanting, "Lennon, make a sub, Lennon, Lennon, make a sub".
Here's the thing. We were already playing really well!
I don't just mean better than usual. I mean we looked well and truly capable of winning the match 2-1. We were dominating possession in the right areas and the chances were falling for us.
It just makes me wonder, is there a conception that to stand a chance of turning a match round, you just have to make substitutions? And if so, is that just fair enough?
It also makes me wonder - especially reading the forums, listening to post match radio talk shows etc - do people make a point of expecting Lennon to make a sub early on so that if he doesn't and we still lose, it's an easy stick to poke him with?
Here's the thing. We were already playing really well!
I don't just mean better than usual. I mean we looked well and truly capable of winning the match 2-1. We were dominating possession in the right areas and the chances were falling for us.
It just makes me wonder, is there a conception that to stand a chance of turning a match round, you just have to make substitutions? And if so, is that just fair enough?
It also makes me wonder - especially reading the forums, listening to post match radio talk shows etc - do people make a point of expecting Lennon to make a sub early on so that if he doesn't and we still lose, it's an easy stick to poke him with?