Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Referendum rules should be this...

+9
whatsgoingon
Boggersbelief
Sluffy
scottjames30
Bwfc1958
luckyPeterpiper
wanderlust
BoltonTillIDie
Bolton Nuts
13 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Go down  Message [Page 8 of 9]

141referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:29

Copper Dragon

Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Bwfc1958 wrote:Personally, I think it was an overreaction and Breaders getting banned wasn't called for but from KP's point of view I can see how it would hit a nerve. 

The fact is, it should have been nipped in the bud straight away. 

The conversation could have been simple:

kp: Sorry I banned you there Breaders, I overreacted a bit and it was a knee jerk reaction to having my wife brought into an argument. 

Breaders: it's ok mate, I was just trying to prove a point but I can see why you could get offended by what was said. I'm sorry I offended you that wasn't my intention. 

Kp: Love you Breaders. 

Breaders: Love you too mate. 

There we go, done and dusted.


The problem with that is that you have the two flower pot men stirring it up.

Has Scott got some sort of hold over Sluffy? That's a serious question.

142referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:30

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Bwfc1958 wrote:Personally, I think it was an overreaction and Breaders getting banned wasn't called for but from KP's point of view I can see how it would hit a nerve. 

The fact is, it should have been nipped in the bud straight away. 

The conversation could have been simple:

kp: Sorry I banned you there Breaders, I overreacted a bit and it was a knee jerk reaction to having my wife brought into an argument. 

Breaders: it's ok mate, I was just trying to prove a point but I can see why you could get offended by what was said. I'm sorry I offended you that wasn't my intention. 

Kp: Love you Breaders. 

Breaders: Love you too mate. 

There we go, done and dusted.
That was beautiful 58 and the worlds a better place for it

143referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:34

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Copper Dragon wrote:
Bwfc1958 wrote:Personally, I think it was an overreaction and Breaders getting banned wasn't called for but from KP's point of view I can see how it would hit a nerve. 

The fact is, it should have been nipped in the bud straight away. 

The conversation could have been simple:

kp: Sorry I banned you there Breaders, I overreacted a bit and it was a knee jerk reaction to having my wife brought into an argument. 

Breaders: it's ok mate, I was just trying to prove a point but I can see why you could get offended by what was said. I'm sorry I offended you that wasn't my intention. 

Kp: Love you Breaders. 

Breaders: Love you too mate. 

There we go, done and dusted.


The problem with that is that you have the two flower pot men stirring it up.

Has Scott got some sort of hold over Sluffy? That's a serious question.

Here he is, burnleys answer to Liam Neeson

144referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:35

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:
scottjames30 wrote:Spot on lad, you'll soon get to know his Mard rants, and stupid behaviour, but you'll just end up laughing and taking the piss out of the prick, he's in a world of his own and talks jab.
So don't sink to that level mate, from previous interactions with you you seem a decent poster but some of the stuff you've put on here and the PM (if real) is taking it lower.
I agree, I shouldn't sink to his trash. but I don't like seeing other posters bullied , putting up with personal abuse, just because the referendum didn't go his way, he threw his toys out of the pram, waved his arms about and look a right div in doing so.

He even said " cheers mate " I've lost a lot of money out of this , as if it was KPs fault ????

What an utter tosser .

145referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:36

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Copper Dragon wrote:
Bwfc1958 wrote:Personally, I think it was an overreaction and Breaders getting banned wasn't called for but from KP's point of view I can see how it would hit a nerve. 

The fact is, it should have been nipped in the bud straight away. 

The conversation could have been simple:

kp: Sorry I banned you there Breaders, I overreacted a bit and it was a knee jerk reaction to having my wife brought into an argument. 

Breaders: it's ok mate, I was just trying to prove a point but I can see why you could get offended by what was said. I'm sorry I offended you that wasn't my intention. 

Kp: Love you Breaders. 

Breaders: Love you too mate. 

There we go, done and dusted.


The problem with that is that you have the two flower pot men stirring it up.

Has Scott got some sort of hold over Sluffy? That's a serious question.
You mean my dad?

146referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:38

Copper Dragon

Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Blaggers - I'm more of a Steve McQueen.

147referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:41

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

scottjames30 wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
scottjames30 wrote:Spot on lad, you'll soon get to know his Mard rants, and stupid behaviour, but you'll just end up laughing and taking the piss out of the prick, he's in a world of his own and talks jab.
So don't sink to that level mate, from previous interactions with you you seem a decent poster but some of the stuff you've put on here and the PM (if real) is taking it lower.
I agree, I shouldn't sink to his trash. but I don't like seeing other posters bullied , putting up with personal abuse, just because the referendum didn't go his way, he threw his toys out of the pram, waved his arms about and look a right div in doing so.

He even said " cheers mate " I've lost a lot of money out of this , as if it was KPs fault ????

What an utter tosser .
I agree it was ridiculous the whole thing to personally attack someone for voting differently to you is fucked up.
And so have parts of your rants today, be good if everyone moves on. Some decent folk on here but after the referendum the whole thing imploded and to be fair breadman was the main instigator of the unpleasantness by taking it all as a personal attack.

148referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:43

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

He's not worth it mate , everybody should move on, rightly so,

149referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:50

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:
I agree it was ridiculous the whole thing to personally attack someone for voting differently to you is fucked up.
And so have parts of your rants today, be good if everyone moves on. Some decent folk on here but after the referendum the whole thing imploded and to be fair breadman was the main instigator of the unpleasantness by taking it all as a personal attack.

You talk such shite. It's a fooking football forum, not Mumsnet.

I pity you if you're as soft as this in real life.

150referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:53

Copper Dragon

Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Natasha Whittam wrote:
I pity you if you're as soft as this in real life.


I'll check it out if you like.

I can be in Bolton within an hour.

151referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:54

Guest


Guest

Sorry WGO, but in no way was it an attack on KP or his Mrs, it was a legitimate point. As I've said multiple times the only person throwing insults was KP himself.

152referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:55

Guest


Guest

Copper Dragon wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
I pity you if you're as soft as this in real life.


I'll check it out if you like.

I can be in Bolton within an hour.

Laughing

153referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:55

Guest


Guest

I didn't "attack him personally" though and that's the whole point.

And I'm not wasting time reiterating what actually happened over and over again.

Think what you want, I honestly don't give a shit.

154referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:55

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
I agree it was ridiculous the whole thing to personally attack someone for voting differently to you is fucked up.
And so have parts of your rants today, be good if everyone moves on. Some decent folk on here but after the referendum the whole thing imploded and to be fair breadman was the main instigator of the unpleasantness by taking it all as a personal attack.

You talk such shite. It's a fooking football forum, not Mumsnet.

I pity you if you're as soft as this in real life.
Is that the best you've got, it's a football forum not a political forum or platform for personal attacks.
Notice you've been absent through it, a bit above you're limited intellect

155referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:57

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Copper Dragon wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
I pity you if you're as soft as this in real life.


I'll check it out if you like.

I can be in Bolton within an hour.
12 fingers against 10 isn't fair

156referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 21:58

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:Is that the best you've got, it's a football forum not a platform for personal attacks.

Of course it is, it's the verbal attacks that keep the site going.

If you don't like verbal attacks I suggest Mumsnet really is the place for you. Although they can get quite passionate about breast feeding in public, so perhaps you'd be out of your depth on there too.

157referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 22:00

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Breadman wrote:I didn't "attack him personally" though and that's the whole point.

And I'm not wasting time reiterating what actually happened over and over again.

Think what you want, I honestly don't give a shit.


I'm beginning to think I missed what you actually said because I can't believe everyone is getting so worked up over what I thought you said.

Bernard Dennis Park and White87 got away with racist comments for ages before they were moved on, so what you said must have been vicious to top that!

158referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 22:01

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

What's mums-net?
Is it a porn site.

159referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 22:05

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Natasha Whittam wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:Is that the best you've got, it's a football forum not a platform for personal attacks.

Of course it is, it's the verbal attacks that keep the site going.

If you don't like verbal attacks I suggest Mumsnet really is the place for you. Although they can get quite passionate about breast feeding in public, so perhaps you'd be out of your depth on there too.
Personal attacks within the personas on the site is fair game, taking it outside the site into real life is wrong.
You can't get attacked about your personal life because no one knows what you are other than the fact that you're not a successful thirty something female

160referendum - Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 8 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 22:07

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

My Mrs is full English, I don't want any attack please!!!!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 8 of 9]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum