Bring Back Boggers

I'm not arguing that Boggers and Scott deserved their ban, and the loss of Scott will not hurt this site one bit.

But Boggers contributed in his own way. Yes, he was a bellend but most of us are guilty of that and have had our stupid moments.

When Boggers and Scott were banned there were several posters congratulating the mods for their actions, saying the site would be better off without them. So where are all the interesting or funny posts from these people now that the site is Boggers/Scott free? Who has stepped up now that Boggers can't take the piss?

I'll tell you, no one. I've just been away for a few days and each night I would check the site for something worth reading. Take away the news posts by KP or Sluffy and there was absolutely bugger all. I thought I was on the Mavies forum.

I may be wrong but I'd be surprised if the last fortnight hasn't been the quietest period in the history of Bolton Nuts. And it's only going to get worse.

Perhaps people need to accept that any forum needs an edge. A character or two who can set the site off with a couple of posts. Yes, they may overstep the mark from time to time but, as far as I am concerned, any forum is at its best when people are arguing over nothing.

Folk on here seem to like being shocked or outraged by certain posts or posters, but I'll bet you they really love reading the shite that gets posted on here. I know I do.

So I'm asking the mods to reinstate Boggers. Before more people drift away because no one is posting.

Many thanks.

Natasha Whittam (24,000+ posts)

I don't get it.

Anyway, I'm interested in the thoughts of the regulars, not newbies.

You must have missed the racing thread Nat. It was hilarious. More Mark Leach.

boltonbonce wrote:You must have missed the racing thread Nat. It was hilarious. More Mark Leach.

Mark Leach does seem like a character people could come to dislike, but his posting is erratic.

We need commitment and passion, not posting ponces.

Where's Magoo?

it would be unfair to let one back without the other, so it's a big call.

It has been quiet on here recently but that doesn't mean i want them back, they were the worst kind of bullies, ganging up on people in tandom. Individually they were fine but together they were a pain in the arse.

Does anyone know if they really want to come back anyway?

boltonbonce wrote:Where's Magoo?

Where's 1874? Where's Hipster? Where's Breadman?

Breadman has a Jaffa Cake issue.

Norpig wrote:it would be unfair to let one back without the other, so it's a big call.

It has been quiet on here recently but that doesn't mean i want them back, they were the worst kind of bullies, ganging up on people in tandom. Individually they were fine but together they were a pain in the arse.

I'm asking for Boggers back, not Scott, so your bullery worry is mute.

boltonbonce wrote:Breadman has a Jaffa Cake issue.

I don't care about his sexuality.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Norpig wrote:it would be unfair to let one back without the other, so it's a big call.

It has been quiet on here recently but that doesn't mean i want them back, they were the worst kind of bullies, ganging up on people in tandom. Individually they were fine but together they were a pain in the arse.

I'm asking for Boggers back, not Scott, so your bullery worry is mute.

Moot.

Sorry, couldn't let it pass without comment.

Did they not teach English at Penwortham Penitentiary For Fallen Girls?

Bread2.0 wrote:

Moot.

Sorry, couldn't let it pass without comment.

Did they not teach English at Penwortham Penitentiary For Fallen Girls?

And so you should be.

Don't try and be clever and use words you don't understand again....

Bread2.0 wrote:And so you should be......

It's mute not moot.

But if you want to start an English thread then go ahead.

I have bigger things to sort.

Did you work for the Leave Campaign recently?

"If you get caught out, just stick to your guns and tell and outright lie - that'll work!" seemed to be quite a popular strategy with them.

Vaping is bad for you Bread. You'll have to give it up.Try something else.

has Boggers been crying to you Nat? If it had to be one or the other then Boggers did contribute more to the site.

what do the powers that be think of this?

84-3 now.

They'll never get 445.

Norpig wrote:has Boggers been crying to you Nat?

No, I only get that sort of PM from you, and occasionally KP.