Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs, piss about a bit or sometimes react to things. I don't have any agenda on here I just go with the flow.
Should boggers be re-instated
+10
DEANO82
Boggersbelief
whatsgoingon
Natasha Whittam
Bollotom2014
Bread2.0
xmiles
boltonbonce
Norpig
karlypants
14 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Should boggers be re-instated
22 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:33
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs
88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.
I have feelings you know.
23 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:42
whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.Natasha Whittam wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs
88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.
I have feelings you know.
because you are "special"
24 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:55
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
What happened to the other 10%?whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.Natasha Whittam wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs
88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.
I have feelings you know.
because you are "special"
25 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 14:59
whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
thats held in reserve for your bum chummery behind bbkarlypants wrote:What happened to the other 10%?whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise for wasting 1.55% of my bullery and will concentrate wholly on you in future.Natasha Whittam wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:Don't want a reaction at all and don't single anyone out for digs
88.45% of your posts have been bullery aimed at me.
I have feelings you know.
because you are "special"
27 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:07
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%
It's posts like that which show why you spend your afternoons posting on a football forum and not running a major international PLC.
28 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:08
whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
keep up we've covered that,Natasha Whittam wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:bread must be pissed off about the other 1.55%
It's posts like that which show why you spend your afternoons posting on a football forum and not running a major international PLC.
29 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:11
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
whatsgoingon wrote:
keep up we've covered that,
Yes, but abusing you never gets old.
30 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:12
whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Unlike you, that's bullery I've got feelings you know,Natasha Whittam wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:
keep up we've covered that,
Yes, but abusing you never gets old.
31 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:29
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
so where is Boggers ? Is he keeping us waiting for his big return? I can hardly contain my excitement here
32 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 15:43
whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
He's back girder your loinsNorpig wrote:so where is Boggers ? Is he keeping us waiting for his big return? I can hardly contain my excitement here
33 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:01
xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Well they haven't insulted anyone yet but they seem to think quantity rather than quality is all that matters. Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.
34 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:05
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
xmiles wrote:Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.
How ironic.
35 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:08
Guest
Guest
Boggersbelief wrote:xmiles wrote:Being annoying and boring does not make you a character.
How ironic.
Do you understand what ironic means Boggers?
36 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:09
DEANO82
Tony Kelly
Alanis Morissette didn't and she wrote a song about it.
37 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:11
Guest
Guest
Are you suggesting Boggers could be Alanis Morissette? What would that make Scott?
38 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:12
DEANO82
Tony Kelly
No , just saying not everyone understands what irony is, which isn't ironic.
39 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:18
Guest
Guest
Very true, but the question was whether or not Boggers does?
40 Re: Should boggers be re-instated Wed Aug 31 2016, 21:25
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Are the results of this poll going to be legally binding?
You know.....like in the Brexit Referendum?
The people of Nuts have spoken and I would hate to think that the powers behind the forum would stoop so low as to ignore the result (and the will of their stakeholders) just to serve their own ends.
That'd be a shit trick - ignoring a popular mandate simply because you think the people who've voted are all weak-minded or summat.
You would expect that from Mike Smith and those dicks in the ST, not Nuts.
You know.....like in the Brexit Referendum?
The people of Nuts have spoken and I would hate to think that the powers behind the forum would stoop so low as to ignore the result (and the will of their stakeholders) just to serve their own ends.
That'd be a shit trick - ignoring a popular mandate simply because you think the people who've voted are all weak-minded or summat.
You would expect that from Mike Smith and those dicks in the ST, not Nuts.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum