Trump and the call girls

The more I hear about Trump and the hookers in Moscow, the more I am torn between conflicting conspiracy theories. 
On the one hand this could be manoeuverings from the American "establishment" (using a British agent) to undermine the new President in order to limit his activities - as Trump claims.
On the other Trump's election win could have been rigged by the Russians in the full knowledge that they already have him by the nuts and controlling the POTUS is exactly what they would want. 

Is it feasible that Trump is in fact a pawn of Moscow?

On another note, in what sense does handing his business interests over to his son divulge him of conflict of interest?

Given his past comments and actions i can bet the golden showers and the rest are all true. The Russians will be furious this has leaked now before they could use it against once he was in office

The whole story of the email hacks and trying to get him in office and then blackmailing him does sound like a spy story or film but that doesn't mean it's not true

I give him a year before he steps down for one scandal or another

Divest, surely?

And no it doesn't.

And for the record, I'm dubious as to whether or not these videos do actually exist but it's nice to see the twat being played at his own game for a change, ie make some shit up and sling it at him.

My big concern is over the fact that he's said he's setting up an internal investigation into the security services which will report back in 90 days.

It looks to me as though he's going to do the same as he's already done with his cabinet appointments, ie appoint one of his goons, thus neutering the CIA, etc and preventing the truth from coming out.

Bread2.0 wrote:Divest, surely?

Indeed. Having a few senior moments today. Got out of the shower this morning, reached for the deodorant and squirted my armpit with shaving gel. Not the best start.

Was there ever as murky a situation as this for an in coming president. He hasn't taken the oath of office yet and already its turning into a media circus and scandal.
I'm not going to listen to any more of it as its  a crisis based on rumour ,hearsay, bluff and double bluff.
He's an arrogant disaster not simply waiting for the chaos to unfold- its unfolding before he gets his hands on power.
It simply makes me afraid-  a consummate politician like Putin ( like him or loathe him) will run rings round him.
The  Russians must be jubilant.
It wouldn't surprise me that when he's taking the oath of office Russian tanks start rolling into the Baltic republics.

rammywhite wrote:
The  Russians must be jubilant.
It wouldn't surprise me that when he's taking the oath of office Russian tanks start rolling into the Baltic republics.

IF there is anything in this I suspect it will be buried in the internal enquiry and the Russki's won't be able to do much because as Norpig points out, the early release of the story kinda blows their cover.

What struck me yesterday was the massive difference between the outgoing eloquent, dignified president and the incoming lout.

wanderlust wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:Divest, surely?

Indeed. Having a few senior moments today. Got out of the shower this morning, reached for the deodorant and squirted my armpit with shaving gel. Not the best start.

Same here. I buttered a block of cheese instead of the bread the other night.

If a fish could talk it would make the same mouth movements as Donald Fart!
He'll only do one term maximum, if he doesn't shoot himself in the foot somebody will do it for him, but a bit higher.

Helluva inaugural speech from Trump and I imagine that his supporters will be over the moon with the nationalist "America first" tone even if they don't believe it will be possible to revitalise their coal and steel industries and put them on a profitable footing. 
Fortunately the UK will be first in line to get a deal that will benefit Americans everywhere. It's going to be a fascinating first 100 days during which Trump promised to initiate all his major electoral promises.

Go trump, glad to see the back of that feeble useless weak excuse for a commander in chief and his gob on a stick Bint.

Interesting article with good BBC links assessing Trump's chances of delivering on his promises....
Also assesses Obama's performance

Bread: Thanks for the above:- brilliant!

Spot on, isn't it?