BBC Fans forum is broadcast tonight’s at 6 for any one who is interested
BBC Manchester
BBC Manchester
Go to page : 1, 2
Norpig wrote:Missed the first 15 minutes but as you can imagine Kenocchio's name was mud. Super John was on and was very blunt about his views on Ken and Parky, especially his style of play.
As Sluffy said it was a one sided panel but it would be hard to find anyone willing to back Ken at the moment other than Sluffy.
If the people who defend Anderson on the internet don't have the self confidence to defend him in public it makes for a one sided debateT.R.O.Y wrote:Which Pro-Anderson pundit/ex-player/fans group should they have included instead Sluffy?
Growler wrote:If the people who defend Anderson on the internet don't have the self confidence to defend him in public it makes for a one sided debateT.R.O.Y wrote:Which Pro-Anderson pundit/ex-player/fans group should they have included instead Sluffy?
T.R.O.Y wrote:That’s all great sluffy, but irrelevant to the question.
Who could have been brought in to the panel to rebalance it?
T.R.O.Y wrote:Right so you’re moaning about it being a one sided panel, yet can’t name a single person who could support your argument and back Anderson.
So instead of criticising those who formed the panel, why don’t you try and accept there are other opinions out there which contradict yours? Nobody else is as one eyed as you about all of this.
Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Right so you’re moaning about it being a one sided panel, yet can’t name a single person who could support your argument and back Anderson.
So instead of criticising those who formed the panel, why don’t you try and accept there are other opinions out there which contradict yours? Nobody else is as one eyed as you about all of this.
My point was not that my opinion is in the minority but that the whole exercise was pointless - there was never going to be anyone there to represent the other side of the debate!
How could it call itself to be a Question and Answers forum when there was no one going to be there with the full knowledge to be able to answer any of the questions???
From the picture it looks like most people (the majority of them being anti-Anderson themselves these days!) recognised the waste of time of the exercise.
One person who attended estimated there to be just about 50 people bothered to turn up - clearly most people pro or anti Ken could see the futility of the event even if you can't (or at least pretend not to, just for the sake of yet another manufactured argument with me).
T.R.O.Y wrote:Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Right so you’re moaning about it being a one sided panel, yet can’t name a single person who could support your argument and back Anderson.
So instead of criticising those who formed the panel, why don’t you try and accept there are other opinions out there which contradict yours? Nobody else is as one eyed as you about all of this.
My point was not that my opinion is in the minority but that the whole exercise was pointless - there was never going to be anyone there to represent the other side of the debate!
How could it call itself to be a Question and Answers forum when there was no one going to be there with the full knowledge to be able to answer any of the questions???
From the picture it looks like most people (the majority of them being anti-Anderson themselves these days!) recognised the waste of time of the exercise.
One person who attended estimated there to be just about 50 people bothered to turn up - clearly most people pro or anti Ken could see the futility of the event even if you can't (or at least pretend not to, just for the sake of yet another manufactured argument with me).
Why does everyone need to be pro or anti anderson to you though? You frame every opinion on the club in this way, it’s not as black and white as you make out.
Kane57 wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Right so you’re moaning about it being a one sided panel, yet can’t name a single person who could support your argument and back Anderson.
So instead of criticising those who formed the panel, why don’t you try and accept there are other opinions out there which contradict yours? Nobody else is as one eyed as you about all of this.
My point was not that my opinion is in the minority but that the whole exercise was pointless - there was never going to be anyone there to represent the other side of the debate!
How could it call itself to be a Question and Answers forum when there was no one going to be there with the full knowledge to be able to answer any of the questions???
From the picture it looks like most people (the majority of them being anti-Anderson themselves these days!) recognised the waste of time of the exercise.
One person who attended estimated there to be just about 50 people bothered to turn up - clearly most people pro or anti Ken could see the futility of the event even if you can't (or at least pretend not to, just for the sake of yet another manufactured argument with me).
Why does everyone need to be pro or anti anderson to you though? You frame every opinion on the club in this way, it’s not as black and white as you make out.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a disordercharacterized primarily by emotional dysregulation, extreme "black and white" thinking (believing that something is one of only two possible things, and ignoring any possible "in-betweens"), and turbulent relationships.
T.R.O.Y wrote:Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Right so you’re moaning about it being a one sided panel, yet can’t name a single person who could support your argument and back Anderson.
So instead of criticising those who formed the panel, why don’t you try and accept there are other opinions out there which contradict yours? Nobody else is as one eyed as you about all of this.
My point was not that my opinion is in the minority but that the whole exercise was pointless - there was never going to be anyone there to represent the other side of the debate!
How could it call itself to be a Question and Answers forum when there was no one going to be there with the full knowledge to be able to answer any of the questions???
From the picture it looks like most people (the majority of them being anti-Anderson themselves these days!) recognised the waste of time of the exercise.
One person who attended estimated there to be just about 50 people bothered to turn up - clearly most people pro or anti Ken could see the futility of the event even if you can't (or at least pretend not to, just for the sake of yet another manufactured argument with me).
Why does everyone need to be pro or anti anderson to you though? You frame every opinion on the club in this way, it’s not as black and white as you make out.
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum