Potential Dapo ban for this

He elbowed him in the face - what do you expect?

He should have been sent off - so 3 game ban is correct.

Sluffy wrote:He elbowed him in the face - what do you expect?

What?  Didn’t say he doesn’t deserve it…

BoltonTillIDie wrote:

Sluffy wrote:He elbowed him in the face - what do you expect?

What?  Didn’t say he doesn’t deserve it…

Good. So we both agree he deliberately elbowed a player in the face and rightly deserved to be sent off - which means a 3 match ban.

How to start an argument from nothing. Brilliant.

boltonbonce wrote:How to start an argument from nothing. Brilliant.

Thread title - Potential Dappo ban for this.

I say - He elbowed him in the face what do you expect?


Where's the argument???

To be fair to sluffy, he waited 14 minutes of the New Year before starting his first argument.

What an absolute bellend, a 3 game ban which will no doubt lead to Kachunga starting again.

I trust Evans will come out and condemn this behaviour.

Irrefutable evidence as to who causes the arguments on here.... 

And, as before, with an egocentric point to prove, he will pursue this like a dog with a bare bone.

okocha wrote:Irrefutable evidence as to who causes the arguments on here.... 

And, as before, with an egocentric point to prove, he will pursue this like a dog with a bare bone.

Yeah right...

There clearly is no argument here, but quite a few who are trying their best to make one up!

Dapo elbowed someone in the face and should have been sent off.

Anybody disagree with me on that?

(After all that was all that I actually said).

No?

Of course you don't, as it's there for everyone to see for yourselves.



So Happy New Year to you all.

(Even to the 'irrefutable' fake account one too!).

Sluffy wrote:

Yeah right...

There clearly is no argument here, but quite a few who are trying their best to make one up!

Dapo elbowed someone in the face and should have been sent off.

Anybody disagree with me on that?

(After all that was all that I actually said).

No?

Of course you don't, as it's there for everyone to see for yourselves.



So Happy New Year to you all.

(Even to the 'irrefutable' fake account one too!).

QED....a perfect example of a rabid dog with a bone! 

Incidentally, from the day I joined, you have persisted in claiming mine is a "fake" account. I don't even know what that means! 

What is it that constitutes such a thing? At the beginning, I asked you to explain but you didn't provide any reasonable answer and still haven't...

How are your New Year's resolutions going?

okocha wrote:QED....a perfect example of a rabid dog with a bone! 

Incidentally, from the day I joined, you have persisted in claiming mine is a "fake" account. I don't even know what that means! 

What is it that constitutes such a thing? At the beginning, I asked you to explain but you didn't provide any reasonable answer and still haven't...

How are your New Year's resolutions going?

If you say so...

For someone who claims to be such an expert on peaceful and calming ways with ten years of training and experience, you do get awfully worked up and excited over little old me, all the time!

Funny that wouldn't you think?

Well I do.

More like what trolls do than people who are chilled.

If you really aren't a troll, then all you need to do is practice your tranquil techniques upon yourself.

Cura te ipsum as they say!

Can someone please explain to me what is a fake account?

I'm not actually called Cajunboy, so is my account fake?

I don't think Boltonbonce was christened Boltonbonce.

Who actually is Sluffy?

Cajunboy wrote:Can someone please explain to me what is a fake account?

I'm not actually called Cajunboy, so is my account fake?

I don't think Boltonbonce was christened Boltonbonce.

Who actually is Sluffy?

How dare you!
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Cajunboy wrote:Can someone please explain to me what is a fake account?

I'm not actually called Cajunboy, so is my account fake?

I don't think Boltonbonce was christened Boltonbonce.

Who actually is Sluffy?

A fake account is basically someone on the site having two or more active accounts.

They post under one account as normal but use the other accounts to create 'mischief'.

This 'mischief' can be passive in terms of it posting in fun or it can be used maliciously to create trouble, such as being used to troll.

People on social media can be incredibly naive at times and believe what they 'see' on the forum (and even more so what the accounts tell them via pm's away from the forum)

For example someone posts something and three or four other posters immediately then post negatively towards what the first poster had posted (or indeed negatively at the poster directly).

It would appear then that the 'crowd' is against what the original poster had posted and/or the poster himself.

In reality though the 'crowd' (the 'three or four' other posters) may actually just be just one poster using his 'fake' accounts to create 'mischief'.

Take this thread for instance - an 'argument' has been created out of absolutely nothing - and as usual it turned into a personal attack on me from a certain account.

I've got one account on here, I'm sure Cajun you only have one account also but don't make the mistake that every other poster on here only posts under one account also.

They don't!

Some post on here with more than one account.

The accounts they use to create 'mischief' are 'fake accounts'.

Understand now what they are and what they are used for?


You see people generally tend to follow the 'crowd', and indeed start to think that way and parrot it too.

It only takes one or two people using fake accounts to create a 'direction' and 'normal' posters (such as yourself say) are more than likely swayed and influenced to think the same way.

For instance did I created and argument on this thread - no I've not but you (and no doubt many others) instantly will believe I did.

Give a dog a bad name type of thing.


This what happened actually on this thread

1 - BTID was over sensitive to something I'd posted.
2 - Bonce spotted a chance to get his spoon out and give it a stir.
3 - Natasha poked fun at it/me.
4 - Fake account posted make it personal and troll me (yet again) - and that's the point where fake accounts become more trouble than what they are worth.


That's how social media works Cajun, not just on here but throughout all forms of the media.

To be honest I'm amazed you haven't sussed this out long before now.

People take social media too seriously and those that do can be 'influenced'.

That's why I always caution don't believe anything you read on it and always check things out for yourself.

It just people having a bit of fun on here but as always the problem is when the fun goes a bit too far.

End of the day Dapo elbowed that player and should have been sent off - no one as disagreed with me, yet this whole thread is about an argument that never actually happened and according to some this is 'irrefutable evidence' that I'm the 'egocentric' one who causes all the arguments on here...

Yeah right...

Jesus Christ, how was I over sensitive?

You asked me what did I expect?  
No doubt jumping to the conclusion that I didn’t believe it was justified.  Seems others saw it the same as me. But of course I’m the one to blame for being over sensitive.  Just admit you misinterpreted my post and move on.  Practice what you preach.

Anyway, he now has a 3 match ban.