Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Who's the latest pervert at the BBC?

+11
Cajunboy
wanderlust
okocha
Hip Priest
Ten Bobsworth
Whitesince63
Norpig
Mad Dog
BoltonTillIDie
finlaymcdanger
karlypants
15 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Go down  Message [Page 8 of 8]

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

boltonbonce wrote:
Hi Glos, always nice to hear from you.
Before we head off to the match, I think I should mention that we all lie on the internet.
I'm pretty sure Sluffy is a vicar, Nat is a turf accountant in Basingstoke, and Lusty is a retired glass blower from Barrow.
63 is a Marxist, KP is a binman, and Norpig is a florist in St Helens.
As for myself, I'm a Mexican drug lord with a passion for English football.
I won't mention Breadman and a few others, to protect the innocent.
63, agree with lack of progress down to some deliberate manipulation. However, I think waiting for the opportunity to make the most of the situation has now passed them by, which I put down to incompetence. Its very frustrating, but I'm sure we'll get there eventually.

Hi Bonce, Good to see your're still rolling along. I could say that I was a stud in my pre-retirement life, but that would be wishful thinking. I was nearer a pressed stud than anything else  Laughing

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Cajunboy wrote:Thanks Bonce.
I should think so, Your Majesty.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

FFS, I clicked on this thread to read about perverts not more Brexit bollocks.

This is a thread for perverts, the rest of you should fook right off.

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Seems Edwards was indeed a sicko!

Huw Edwards admits child abuse image charges

Who's the latest pervert at the BBC? - Page 8 6b341d60-4f20-11ef-aebc-6de4d31bf5cd

Huw Edwards, once the BBC's most senior news presenter, has pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children.

He admitted having 41 indecent images of children, which had been sent to him by another man on WhatsApp, Westminster Magistrates' Court heard.

They included seven category A images, the most serious classification - two of which showed a child aged between about seven and nine.

Police later revealed the man who sent the images to Edwards was a convicted paedophile.

Until last year, Edwards was one of the main presenters on BBC One's News at Ten and often fronted coverage of major national events.

Edwards was flanked by police officers and surrounded by photographers as he entered and left the court on Wednesday.

He was expressionless outside court and inside the hearing, which lasted for less than half an hour.

As the charges were read to him, he replied "guilty" three times, quietly and calmly.

The court heard he had been involved in online chat on WhatsApp from December 2020 with an adult man, who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.

Under the law, images can mean both video clips and still pictures. The Crown Prosecution Service said most of the category A images were estimated to show children aged between 13 and 15. Two clips showed a child aged about seven to nine.

Category A images show serious abuse including penetrative sexual activity.

He also had 12 category B pictures, which involve non-penetrative sexual activity, and 22 photographs in category C, which covers other indecent images. The category B and C pictures showed children aged between 12 to 15.

After the hearing, police said officers started investigating Edwards after seizing a phone as part of an unrelated probe, which revealed his participation in a WhatsApp conversation.

The Metropolitan Police said a 25-year-old paedophile called Alex Williams, who was sentenced to a suspended 12-month jail sentence at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court in Wales on 15 March, had shared indecent images of children with Edwards.

The court was earlier told that, on 2 February 2021, the other man asked whether what he was sending was too young, to which Edwards asked him not to send any underage images.

The final indecent image was sent in August 2021 - a category A film featuring a young boy.

The man told Edwards the boy was quite young looking, and that he had more images which were illegal, the court was told.

Edwards told him not to send any illegal images.

No more were sent, and the pair continued to exchange legal pornographic images until April 2022.

Edwards's barrister Philip Evans KC told the court: "There’s no suggestion in this case that Mr Edwards has... in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort."

He added that Edwards "did not keep any images, did not send any to anyone else and did not and has not sought similar images from anywhere else".

Edwards pleaded guilty to three charges of making indecent photographs of a child. In the law, a photograph can also mean video footage.

"Making" indecent images can have a wide legal definition, and covers more than simply taking or filming the original picture or clip.

The Crown Prosecution Service says, external it can include opening an email attachment containing an image; downloading an image from a website to a screen; storing an image on a computer; accessing a pornographic website in which an images appears in an automatic "pop-up" window; receiving an image via social media, even if unsolicited and even if part of a group; or live-streaming images of children.

A court must also decide whether an offence falls into the category of possession, distribution or production.

According to the Sentencing Council, external, creating the original image counts as production - the more serious of the three categories. It adds that "making an image by simple downloading should be treated as possession for the purposes of sentencing".

In such cases, sentences can range from six months to three years in prison. However, a community order with a sex offender treatment programme requirement can be an alternative to jail time "where there is a sufficient prospect of rehabilitation".

Full article here -

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

BBC sacks presenter Jermaine Jenas after complaints

Who's the latest pervert at the BBC? - Page 8 05406eb0-609f-11ef-ac2e-0dde5f4fd683

Jermaine Jenas, who presented The One Show and appeared on Match of the Day for the BBC, has been sacked by the corporation following complaints about workplace conduct.

The former footballer, 41, has been taken off air from both primetime shows.

BBC News understands his contract was terminated this week because of alleged issues relating to workplace behaviour.

Responding to the news, Jenas said there were "two sides to every story" but he would let his "lawyers deal with it".

The allegations involve digital communications such as texts, which were raised with the corporation a few weeks ago.

Jenas is also employed by TNT Sports, a group of paid television sports channels. They told the BBC they were not making any comment.

His profile was removed from his agent's website on Thursday evening.


Full article here -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy76pdz5152o

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

It sounds a bit more serious than he makes out if his profile is removed from his agents website. Hmm…

Whitesince63


El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

What is wrong with these people? Surely being in the public eye they must be well aware that anything they say or write in whatever format is going to be a potential stick to beat them with? Are they really that stupid or is it because they’ve let the fame go to their heads so much that common sense departs? Clearly as Jenas says there are two sides to every story but it doesn’t look good to me and it’s ok saying my lawyers are looking at it but that doesn’t mean they won’t advise him against taking it further. At least the BBC have acted quickly this time so maybe lessons are being learned?

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I quite agree with you 63 but I feel that Jermaine Jenas situation has been dealt with swiftly by the Beeb due to their reputation and the numerous cases in the past notably that of Huw Edwards recently with them being slow to react in the past.

So far though all we know is that hes sent a few texts to a colleague which could be "your tits look great in that dress your wearing today. Fancy dinner and a shag tonight?" This wouldn't warrant a sacking in my opinion and just a telling off. Perhaps she was a snowflake and secretly didn't like him and has tried to and so far successfully got him the sack?

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

We all now know how KP met Mrs KP, you sliver tongued charmer  Very Happy

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Norpig wrote:We all now know how KP met Mrs KP, you sliver tongued charmer  Very Happy

lol!

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I'm now beginning to wonder now that I have found out that Jermaine Jenas and Jermaine Pennant are both best friends, Pennant has led Jenas down a very winding path to infidelity.

I would now like to change my post above from offering the colleague to a simple dinner and a shag to dinner and a spit roast due to Pennant being a dirty dog and serial male cheater. clown



Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

So he was being a bit of a perv then...

I am sorry and ashamed after BBC sacking - Jenas

Jermaine Jenas has told the Sun newspaper, external he is "ashamed" and has "let everybody down" after being sacked as a BBC presenter.

He told the paper he sent "inappropriate messages" to two colleagues on the One Show, but insisted he "did nothing illegal" and said they were sent to "two consenting adults".

He told the Sun the texts were a "huge error of judgement" for which he was "deeply sorry", adding that he was "not a sex pest".

Jenas, who is married with four children, told the paper he is receiving therapy and accepted he "fell below [the] standards" of the BBC.

The 41-year-old continued: “I feel so ashamed. I’ve let everybody down - my colleagues, my friends and, most importantly, I’ve let my family down."

Jenas said he owed "everyone an apology, especially the women" he was messaging, and added: "I am sorry for what I have put them through."

He denied sending any explicit pictures or video, the Sun reported.

Full article here -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy9enw5xp2qo

Whitesince63


El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

What an utter clown. Clearly he never considered his family in whatever he did? Just another saddo.

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Not a perv but possibly a wife beater?

TV host Jay Blades charged with abusive behaviour

Jay Blades, host of BBC series The Repair Shop, has been charged with engaging in controlling and coercive behaviour against his wife.

The presenter faces one charge and appeared at Kidderminster Magistrates' Court on Friday.

Following the news, the BBC has dropped a repeat of an episode of David & Jay’s Touring Toolshed, in which Mr Blades appears with actor David Jason, from Friday's BBC One schedule.

A BBC spokesperson said: "It would not be appropriate to comment on ongoing legal proceedings."

He has also resigned as chancellor of Buckinghamshire New University with immediate effect, the institution said.

Full article here -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx282wzxx0xo

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

You just never know, do you. The face behind the TV mask.

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Beats me why they do whatever it is they do, knowing full well that their career is at stake if word gets out?

I can understand people like footballers or the Royals, who have lived in a bubble all their life, not having a clue as to the consequences of their actions but I would have thought Blades would have been more streetwise.

You should never hit a woman anyway.

To be fair we have yet to hear his side of the story but something clearly has happened.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 8 of 8]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum