Like I said, it's an inexact science so making the decisions as to who gets out and who doesn't is subjective - and they are statistically likely to get it wrong sometimes. So do we kill everyone who has a problem to be on the safe side?Michael Bolton wrote:Yes agree Nat, I read about that poor British woman who was murdered in Tenerife last year where the offender was a mental and had a history of violence and he went and cut that woman's head off in a supermarket. How on earth can someone like that be allowed to be allowed to walk the streets?
And then on the news on Wednesday was the woman who was mental who stabbed a woman to death after telling police she felt she was going to kill someone (she had killed her mum previous to that) again how on earth is someone like that given the all clear to walk in public? Who makes these decisions to let these people enter the public?
If so, who decides who has a problem - and how?
Natasha for example is frequently seething. That doesn't sound particularly stable. Perhaps we could start there to test the principle?