wanderlust wrote:
QPR and Ipswich both away - there's a very good chance it will happen, but we'll survive no problem.
You poor deluded man.
Go to page : 1, 2
wanderlust wrote:
QPR and Ipswich both away - there's a very good chance it will happen, but we'll survive no problem.
This is a rare event but I agree fully with Natasha here. Wanderlust mate, saying we'll survive no problem is a bit silly. The fact is that no team is EVER too good to go down if they are performing badly and with no apparent confidence or plan.Natasha Whittam wrote:wanderlust wrote:
QPR and Ipswich both away - there's a very good chance it will happen, but we'll survive no problem.
You poor deluded man.
scottjames30 wrote:We'll get one point ''max'' out of the next two games.
Reebok Trotter wrote:
I fancy us for all six. I just have a feeling that the Reading game was a big wake-up call and now we have nothing to lose, things can only get better.
Reebok Trotter wrote:scottjames30 wrote:We'll get one point ''max'' out of the next two games.
I fancy us for all six. I just have a feeling that the Reading game was a big wake-up call and now we have nothing to lose, things can only get better.
Natasha Whittam wrote:
It's about time someone shut the site WUM up.
You say this before every match, including the Reading 7-1 thrashing.
RT mate I love an optimist but THREE goals in one game? Us? Wow mate that vino you're holding must have some kick to it.Reebok Trotter wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:
It's about time someone shut the site WUM up.
You say this before every match, including the Reading 7-1 thrashing.
Actually I think you'll find that I went for a 1-1 draw in the Reading game. I can genuinely see us doing QPR either 1-0 or 3-1 and I reckon we can just edge it at Ipswich possibly by one goal to nil.
Natasha Whittam wrote:wanderlust wrote:
QPR and Ipswich both away - there's a very good chance it will happen, but we'll survive no problem.
You poor deluded man.
Just getting into the spirit of it Scott.scottjames30 wrote:Is this a forum full of gamblers?
wanderlust wrote:
We don't and you don't post during the next season as NW or any other alias.
Agreed?
Fair point. What with those and your other 27 aliases the site will be like the Marie Celeste without you.Natasha Whittam wrote:It's difficult to keep logging in and out as NW and BTID.
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum