HomeHenderson's tackle would have been in a "how to tackle properly" video 10 years ago - perfectly timed and got the ball cleanly. Unfortunately the emergence of the football ponce has put paid to proper tackling.
Liverpool v City
+15
Copper Dragon
bwfc71
karlypants
BoltonTillIDie
Natasha Whittam
gloswhite
Hipster_Nebula
scottjames30
Angry Dad
Keegan
aaron_bwfc
Boggersbelief
Culcheth_White
boltonbonce
doffcocker
19 posters
Message [Page 3 of 8]
42 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 16:31
Banks of the Croal
Frank Worthington
Best team won. And at least it had a few Englishmen in it.
43 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 16:33
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
That Kompany, what a shit clearance, might as well of just booted it in his own net.
44 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 16:54
doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Natasha Whittam wrote:Hipster_Nebula wrote:
exactly, yet again the game was, probably, decided by a referee not applying the rule of LAW to the game.
But apparently he handled the game with "great aplomb" according to the commentators who seemed awfully gleeful when Liverpool scored.
Clattenburg definitely bottled it, it was an obvious dive.
I completely understand the commentators and other neutrals wanting Liverpool to win the title, it's better for English football if they do.
Shows what a manager with balls can do. If Dougie was Liverpool manager Stirling would be playing in the reserves and Lucas would be an ever-present.
I'm really happy Liverpool won.
The way City have built their team takes a lot of fun out of the game for me.
Liverpool have had to be a lot shrewder, and they've been brilliant.
If they played like they did in the first half all the time, they'd have it wrapped up by now. In the second half they showed they still have some basic problems. Their passing was bad, and they were easily caught offside numerous times. For that reason I can still see them losing it.
45 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 17:42
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
David Ngog on for Swansea at home to Chelsea.
His first contribution? He mis-controlled the ball under no pressure and gave the ball away.
What a player though!
His first contribution? He mis-controlled the ball under no pressure and gave the ball away.
What a player though!
46 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 17:43
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Ngog is the worst player that I've ever seen ever.
I would love to be up against the fool.
I'd flick him in the bollocks.
I would love to be up against the fool.
I'd flick him in the bollocks.
47 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:01
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Ngog Watch
4 touches:
2 mis-controlled passes, giving ball to opposition
1 header the wrong way
1 dangerous foul which would have been a red card if he wasn't so shit
Utter genius player.
4 touches:
2 mis-controlled passes, giving ball to opposition
1 header the wrong way
1 dangerous foul which would have been a red card if he wasn't so shit
Utter genius player.
48 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:03
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
He's having a good game then, by his standards.
Must because he's on telly.
Must because he's on telly.
49 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:04
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Don't be rude about David, some ponces on here reckoned he was too good for us and would shine in the PL.
50 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:06
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:Don't be rude about David, some ponces on here reckoned he was too good for us and would shine in the PL.
Name and shame.
51 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:29
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Tbf, ngog hasn't played in a while, he looked a little rusty
52 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:31
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
He'd still be a clueless immobile prick if he'd spent the week showering in WD40.Boggersbelief wrote:Tbf, ngog hasn't played in a while, he looked a little rusty
53 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:32
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
boltonbonce wrote:
He'd still be a clueless immobile prick if he'd spent the week showering in WD40.
54 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:35
doffcocker
Ivan Campo
scottjames30 wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:Don't be rude about David, some ponces on here reckoned he was too good for us and would shine in the PL.
Name and shame.
It seems she can't.
55 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 18:47
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
doffcocker wrote:scottjames30 wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:Don't be rude about David, some ponces on here reckoned he was too good for us and would shine in the PL.
Name and shame.
It seems she can't.
56 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 19:01
Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
doffcocker wrote:scottjames30 wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:Don't be rude about David, some ponces on here reckoned he was too good for us and would shine in the PL.
Name and shame.
It seems she can't.
I can though, it was Boggers.
£4 million of goal scoring machine.
58 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 19:02
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Yes, it was Boggers, Hipster and 1874.
59 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 19:03
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
I never said he was a goal machine. He's talking bollocks as per
60 Re: Liverpool v City Sun Apr 13 2014, 19:04
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:I never said he was a goal machine. He's talking bollocks as per
Well yeah, you have a point Boggers.
Message [Page 3 of 8]
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum