No, I'm not talking about the made up shit from the likes of Brightside but a couple of recent story's when jokes (ok they were in bad taste - but they were still only jokes) have been punished way beyond anything reasonable to my mind.
The first was a couple of days back when a civil servant was foung guilty of going on to wikipeadia, in works time and changing an entry.
Big deal!
The thing was it was on the Hillsborough tribute page and he changed the line 'you'll never walk alone' to you'll never walk again.
Offensive to some - yes - but did it really mean he should have been sacked?
Ok, that wasn't the only shit he posted but unless he had other warnings we do not know about, should this 'wumming' be sufficient to cost some one his career - or is it simply just because of the 'site' he posted it on?
Could you ever imagine anyone ever being sacked for slagging off Bolton Nuts on wiki - that is if we ever had an entry on there in the first place!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-27882680
The second story is about a couple who threw some bacon into a mosque and got a year in prison for doing it!
Do you think they would have got a prison sentence if they lobbed it into a synagogue? Or would a team of muslims get a year for say nicking the lead off the roof of your nearest church - I somehow doubt it.
So in these two cases does the punishment really fit the crime - or is it a case of gross over reaction to appease the PC liberal hearted?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-27941589
I know what I think.
The first was a couple of days back when a civil servant was foung guilty of going on to wikipeadia, in works time and changing an entry.
Big deal!
The thing was it was on the Hillsborough tribute page and he changed the line 'you'll never walk alone' to you'll never walk again.
Offensive to some - yes - but did it really mean he should have been sacked?
Ok, that wasn't the only shit he posted but unless he had other warnings we do not know about, should this 'wumming' be sufficient to cost some one his career - or is it simply just because of the 'site' he posted it on?
Could you ever imagine anyone ever being sacked for slagging off Bolton Nuts on wiki - that is if we ever had an entry on there in the first place!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-27882680
The second story is about a couple who threw some bacon into a mosque and got a year in prison for doing it!
Do you think they would have got a prison sentence if they lobbed it into a synagogue? Or would a team of muslims get a year for say nicking the lead off the roof of your nearest church - I somehow doubt it.
So in these two cases does the punishment really fit the crime - or is it a case of gross over reaction to appease the PC liberal hearted?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-27941589
I know what I think.