Home
Long story short.
Since we achieved NewsNow membership it as become a bit pointless some of our fellow BWFC forums pretending that 'Nuts' does not exost and removing any reference to us on their sites.
Recently I tried to help out a fellow forum with some advice on how these days you don't have to be an IT specialist to run sites by using Nuts as an example of how we achieved what we have with only initially having a knowledge of how to deal with IT problems by switching the computer 'off and on again'!
My input was not well received.
Anyway some of that sites members have obviously had a little look at us and this is what they think!
Interesting to see ourselves through other peoples eyes.
Funny how so many people take the internet so seriously.
Each to their own I guess.
Since we achieved NewsNow membership it as become a bit pointless some of our fellow BWFC forums pretending that 'Nuts' does not exost and removing any reference to us on their sites.
Recently I tried to help out a fellow forum with some advice on how these days you don't have to be an IT specialist to run sites by using Nuts as an example of how we achieved what we have with only initially having a knowledge of how to deal with IT problems by switching the computer 'off and on again'!
My input was not well received.
Anyway some of that sites members have obviously had a little look at us and this is what they think!
On a slight tangent, nipped in to sluffy's site and there are a number of high posters, obviously long time members who seem to crap on posters who disagree with them. Abuse is rife, not banter but real abuse. By comparison Natalie, also a member, is an angel. So his assertion that his site is cheap and fair and everyone gets respect is just a load of testicles, though it does appear to be cheap. I was invited to join to view pics and post but I didn't have the will power.
Natalie? Do you mean Natasha? Or has she changed her name again. You say there are a number of "high posters" who are abusive - I've noticed when some of our posters get high, the abuse can fly around! Every site is different and probably reflects its members. I found Wanderer's Way had too much abuse and swearing, but some people like that kind of banter. It is also, I believe, self-evident that if the site administration doesn't moderate discussions and impose discipline, discussion will become - er - franker. So one can choose between a regulated site and an open one, and these options and colours in between tend to be available - pick the site that suits you. This said I have known Sluffy on and off for a long time (virtually speaking). I understand why our powers that be have found him annoying, but in the latest imbroglio he was far more sinned against than sinning when it came to abuse (check what was said by him and to him). For this reason I thought a permanent ban was an over-reaction on the part of site administration, but such things are not a question where my opinion is of value, so there wasn't much point in saying anything
It's not a busy site is it
It seems to have a fair amount of postings, Hoboh. But also lots and lots of different sections and lots of the posts are one liners or even single word responses. However the quality didn't shine through so gave me no interest. And you're right, Monty, it was, is, Natasha. Seemed to be among her own. Oh, well, onwards and upwards
I actually thought Natasha was funny tbh, she was worse on 606
I found her really, really, tediously annoying. Sluffy is an old woman as well. If this site folded I would rather not bother going on a BWFC forum than go on that one with those two.
Interesting to see ourselves through other peoples eyes.
Funny how so many people take the internet so seriously.
Each to their own I guess.
don't think I lasted 24 hours
