HomeBreadman wrote:I'm scared of bald yellow cartoon characters with beer guts and dead Greek writers.
Yes, I am indeed Homerphobic.
His Iliad was good though.49 million for Raheem Sterling
+7
Natasha Whittam
Norpig
Copper Dragon
boltonbonce
Bwfc1958
karlypants
Hipster_Nebula
11 posters
Go to page : 
1, 2, 3
Message [Page 2 of 3]
21 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 11:44
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
His Iliad was good though.22 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:02
Guest
Guest
karlypants wrote:Does no one think that because all this has gone to his head then it's going to impair his performance and become a bit of a flop?
I just have this feeling that he is going to fall flat on his face due to all this.
Due to all what?
23 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:06
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Posts : 38250
Join date : 2012-08-04
bwfc1874 wrote:karlypants wrote:Does no one think that because all this has gone to his head then it's going to impair his performance and become a bit of a flop?
I just have this feeling that he is going to fall flat on his face due to all this.
Due to all what?
His general attitude, wasn't he in the papers for taking drugs?
Thinking he is the best footballer ever, as Bonce has said he is acting like he has won everything already.
The whole thing has gone to his head it seems.
24 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:18
Guest
Guest
He was in the paper for inhaling laughing gas at a party or as the tabloids brand it 'Hippy Crack'. Completely harmless and laughable really, I think the only people that give a shit about that are the journo's who write it.
Do we know he thinks he's the best footballer ever? I don't think so. I think he's just realised he can make a tonne more money and also move to a club who could actually win something.
I get a bit sick of the way we batter players in this country to be honest. Regardless of the cash, leaving Liverpool for City is a step up in every way I'd rather see us backing one of our best young players instead of everybody jumping on the he's not that good anyway bandwagon.
Do we know he thinks he's the best footballer ever? I don't think so. I think he's just realised he can make a tonne more money and also move to a club who could actually win something.
I get a bit sick of the way we batter players in this country to be honest. Regardless of the cash, leaving Liverpool for City is a step up in every way I'd rather see us backing one of our best young players instead of everybody jumping on the he's not that good anyway bandwagon.
25 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:34
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
This gas is dangerous.
Regular use can lead to a vitamin B12 deficiency,nerve damage,and can also depress the formation of white blood cells.
No laughing matter,if you'll pardon the pun.
The lad is badly advised on all fronts,and,if he's not careful,whatever talent he has will be wasted.
Regular use can lead to a vitamin B12 deficiency,nerve damage,and can also depress the formation of white blood cells.
No laughing matter,if you'll pardon the pun.
The lad is badly advised on all fronts,and,if he's not careful,whatever talent he has will be wasted.
26 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:50
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
He's kind of like Navas at this point in his career lots of pace and running but no end product, obviously a lot more upside but at 49 million, I don't think his potential justifies that personally.
means nothing to city though.
means nothing to city though.
27 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 12:56
Guest
Guest
Doing a disservice to Sterling to say he's just a runner. He's got great footwork and is a very intelligent player which is obvious in his versatility.
He's never worth £50 million at this point that's obvious. But he's a great talent who could feasibly go on to be one of the best in the world, I can't think of many young players in Europe better than him Pogba, maybe Veratti, Marquinhos? Not much in it though.
He's never worth £50 million at this point that's obvious. But he's a great talent who could feasibly go on to be one of the best in the world, I can't think of many young players in Europe better than him Pogba, maybe Veratti, Marquinhos? Not much in it though.
28 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 13:07
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
his agent is a real piece of work and he's just interested in his cut not the long term career of his player. Apparently some of his other clients have dropped him because of how he's handled the whole Sterling situation.
29 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 14:48
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Sterling is absolute crap. He's had one good season when Sturridge and Suarez made him look good.
His finishing is terrible, his crossing awful, and he has the strength of a 9 year old girl.
All pace and not much else. Just like that other overated tosspot Theo Walcott.
Mark my words, he will go the same way as Scott Sinclair.
His finishing is terrible, his crossing awful, and he has the strength of a 9 year old girl.
All pace and not much else. Just like that other overated tosspot Theo Walcott.
Mark my words, he will go the same way as Scott Sinclair.
30 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 14:49
Guest
Guest
Your shocking ability to judge talent is infamous on here now Nat, you should lay off the bold predictions for a bit.
31 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:10
Guest
Guest
Schweinsteiger signs for United, think they're taking a risk here. Hasn't been the same player last couple of years and had a few injuries. Big fan of his but not sure he's the answer for United - although at £15 million it's not a huge risk.
Sterling to make more of an impact at City than Schweinsteiger at United - heard it here first.
Sterling to make more of an impact at City than Schweinsteiger at United - heard it here first.
32 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:25
Bollotom2014
Andy Walker
City had the Argie who proved to be shit, then the geezer who had fireworks displays in his bathroom and now this ex-scouser type prima donna. I expect him to nose dive badly when he has to face other top Prem teams.
33 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:29
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Great player, over the market value but a great deal in the long term.
He'll be the player that wins them the title.
He'll be the player that wins them the title.
34 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:34
Guest
Guest
Bollotom2014 wrote:City had the Argie who proved to be shit, then the geezer who had fireworks displays in his bathroom and now this ex-scouser type prima donna. I expect him to nose dive badly when he has to face other top Prem teams.
What?
35 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:49
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Bollotom2014 wrote: He said, City had the Argie who proved to be shit, then the geezer who had fireworks displays in his bathroom and now this ex-scouser type prima donna. I expect him to nose dive badly when he has to face other top Prem teams.
36 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 16:58
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Agree with Nat on Sterling I think he's much more of a Walcott than anything else.
will never be what you want him to be.
he's obviously not "crap" but he is definitely just another overrated English 'talent'
will never be what you want him to be.
he's obviously not "crap" but he is definitely just another overrated English 'talent'
37 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 17:04
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Hipster_Nebula wrote:Agree with Nat on Sterling I think he's much more of a Walcott than anything else.
will never be what you want him to be.
he's obviously not "crap" but he is definitely just another overrated English 'talent'
He's pace and nothing else. Take that away and he'd be playing for Rochdale or Gillingham.
If David Lee had been born 25 years later he'd be playing for Chelsea earning £100k per week.
38 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 17:05
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Raheem sterling is quality. Unlike Walcott.
He might not be worth 49mill but he has potential to be world class
He might not be worth 49mill but he has potential to be world class
39 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 17:22
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:Raheem sterling is quality. Unlike Walcott.
He might not be worth 49mill but he has potential to be world class
Me and you know our football.
40 Re: 49 million for Raheem Sterling Mon Jul 13 2015, 17:25
Guest
Guest
Hipster_Nebula wrote:Agree with Nat on Sterling I think he's much more of a Walcott than anything else.
will never be what you want him to be.
he's obviously not "crap" but he is definitely just another overrated English 'talent'
If you find yourself agreeing with Nat, you're almost certainly wrong.
Message [Page 2 of 3]
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum