HomeRandom......
Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops?
+12
Mr Magoo
luckyPeterpiper
okocha
Fabians Right Peg
Bollotom2014
Boggersbelief
Bolton Nuts
Norpig
Numpty 28723
boltonbonce
karlypants
Natasha Whittam
16 posters
Go to page : 
1, 2, 3
Message [Page 2 of 3]
22 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 14:14
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Think that was a euphemism
23 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 14:28
Bollotom2014
Andy Walker
Some people think they're God, others hear voices in their heads. Lots of people think the world is out to get them. Being a woman/man in a man's/woman's body is just another gene defect. Most blokes go out at weekend trying to get into womens' bodies so it's nothing new.
24 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 14:33
Fabians Right Peg
Andy Walker
Natasha Whittam wrote:Biggie wrote: "how would you feel if you were in a womans body and knew you were a man?"
If you're born a woman, you're a woman. I don't believe this "woman in a man's body" bollocks.
Very narrow minded and verging on placing a stereo type on gender. The way an individual feels and perceives themselves is both psychological and physiological.
There may be instances where gender reassignment is the only option for some individuals but how do you prioritise?
Similar questions have been asked about IVF, not life saving so should that be available on the NHS?
You can't sum up issues like these as each case is individual, and that is why yur broad brush statement is complete garbage.
fortunately there are much better qualified and thankfully open minded individuals making these decisions than you.
25 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 14:38
Guest
Guest
You'll eventually learn not to try end engage Nat in serious and well reasoned debate on threads like this one, mate.
You won't win and you may well wind up punching your screen in frustration.
Believe me......
You won't win and you may well wind up punching your screen in frustration.
Believe me......
26 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 14:49
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Fabians Right Peg wrote:
Very narrow minded and verging on placing a stereo type on gender. The way an individual feels and perceives themselves is both psychological and physiological.
There may be instances where gender reassignment is the only option for some individuals but how do you prioritise?
Similar questions have been asked about IVF, not life saving so should that be available on the NHS?
You can't sum up issues like these as each case is individual, and that is why yur broad brush statement is complete garbage.
fortunately there are much better qualified and thankfully open minded individuals making these decisions than you.
People dying of cancer because they can't get the right drugs, or people born men who want to be women.
Who is more important? Those that want to live or those that want to wear short skirts?
27 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:00
Guest
Guest
Don't do it, Fab..........!
28 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:09
Numpty 28723
Andy Walker
Natasha Whittam wrote:Who is more important? Those that want to live or those that want to wear short skirts?
29 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:33
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Posts : 38250
Join date : 2012-08-04
Whoops! My post was meant for the foodie thread.Breadman wrote:Random......
30 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:44
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman wrote:Don't do it, Fab..........!
Perhaps Fab has a reasoned argument (although I doubt it), something you never quite got the hang of.
31 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:45
okocha
El Hadji Diouf
Go see The Danish Girl at the cinema....
32 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:45
Guest
Guest
Breadman wrote:Don't do it, Fab..........!
He'll learn
We all did
The hard way
33 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:49
Guest
Guest
Natasha Whittam wrote:Breadman wrote:Don't do it, Fab..........!
Perhaps Fab has a reasoned argument (although I doubt it), something you never quite got the hang of.
Don't try your evil click bait voodoo on me, woman.....
I learnt my lesson a while ago.
You just type what you like and I'll ignore it.
34 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:51
Guest
Guest
Anyway, ford transits are over rated. Give me a good old pick up truck any day
35 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:52
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman wrote:
You just type what you like and I'll ignore it.
I don't know what you have against this thread. It's topical and hasn't been done before. I thought that's what you wanted?
36 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 15:55
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
okocha wrote:Go see The Danish Girl at the cinema....
It sounds boring. I recently watched a Danish film called 'Pelle the Conqueror'. I thought it was going to be about a good looking Italian centre forward who plays for Southampton, but it turned out to be about immigrants moving from Sweden to Denmark. I was asleep within minutes.
37 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 16:01
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Posts : 38250
Join date : 2012-08-04
Please see post #4 it really is rather fitting for you.Natasha Whittam wrote:Breadman wrote:Don't do it, Fab..........!
Perhaps Fab has a reasoned argument (although I doubt it), something you never quite got the hang of.
38 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 16:04
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
karlypants wrote:
Please see post #4 it really is rather fitting for you.
I don't have a willy on my head. I'd be even more famous if I did.
39 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 16:17
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Man has penis stolen in his sleep.
Couldn't read any more.
Couldn't read any more.
40 Re: Should NHS Be Funding Tranny Ops? Tue Feb 23 2016, 19:08
Fabians Right Peg
Andy Walker
Natasha Whittam wrote:Fabians Right Peg wrote:
Very narrow minded and verging on placing a stereo type on gender. The way an individual feels and perceives themselves is both psychological and physiological.
There may be instances where gender reassignment is the only option for some individuals but how do you prioritise?
Similar questions have been asked about IVF, not life saving so should that be available on the NHS?
You can't sum up issues like these as each case is individual, and that is why yur broad brush statement is complete garbage.
fortunately there are much better qualified and thankfully open minded individuals making these decisions than you.
People dying of cancer because they can't get the right drugs, or people born men who want to be women.
Who is more important? Those that want to live or those that want to wear short skirts?
The point you seem to have missed is that there are people far more eminently qualified and better informed than you or I who have to live with making these sorts of decisions on a daily basis.
I would however suggest that to answer your question, who is more important, you need to clarify from what perspective you are looking at it, different individuals will put a different value on it depending on how such a situation affects them.
An illness does not need to be life threatening to be prioritised, I would suggest that long term conditions both physical and mental can be just as hard to deal with.
Message [Page 2 of 3]
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum