Important questions asked by BWFCST

Sluffy wrote:
Any official announcement from any organisation is issued under the authority of the most senior person involved.

That doesn't mean the most senior person involved has to 'send' it out themselves, more often than not it is done by one of their staff BUT it still goes out in 'their name'.

I'm old enough to remember when people actually 'signed off' such official announcements, to show it was the 'official' position of that organisation and not that of someone acting without authority or permission.

This procedure is still adhered to in the social media age and any formal notifications of public bodies (of which the ST purports to be) are sent out 'in the name' of the most senior authorised officer involved.

How difficult would it have been for the Chair, Accountant, or the Barrister of the Steering Group to 'hit' the 'send' button and issue the statement themselves, or ask Jamie to issue it under their name?

bwfc1874 wrote:I didn't think I needed to keep making the same point Johnny, you're a grown man I'm sure you understood what I wrote the first time. 

But if you insist I'll go again, at the end of the day these questions are relevant, they could go deeper but they're questions that we as fans do want answers to, so to criticise them for that just says to me you're looking for something to criticise rather than being objective about it and then to get personal about the guy posting it is just embarrassing. Whatever your thoughts on the ST there are some good intentions behind it and some of the Steering Group, so give jamie a break.

bwfc1874 wrote:
I'll ignore your cheap accusation of me of being a WUM, because that really is utter bollocks.

As much as the ST may want to be a serious organisation, they aren't. It's clear their amateurs working this out as they go along, so all I'm saying is give them a break. Every time they do anything you criticise, even when it's a set of questions we all want answers to!

wanderlust wrote:To my knowledge, the ST or any of their supporters has ever suggested they are the "panacea to our problems". They exhibit the traits of a fledgling organisation and questions such as "what are SS' intentions for the club?" Can only be contextualised and evaluated by the answers to the very questions the ST are asking. For me they remain and unknown entity who to date have achieved or influenced nothing.