Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Referendum rules should be this...

+9
whatsgoingon
Boggersbelief
Sluffy
scottjames30
Bwfc1958
luckyPeterpiper
wanderlust
BoltonTillIDie
Bolton Nuts
13 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Go down  Message [Page 6 of 9]

101Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:13

Guest


Guest

whatsgoingon wrote:
scottjames30 wrote:Zzzzzzzzzzz great comeback , well done!!!!!!
Why are you behaving like a 10 year old

When does Scott do anything but behave like a 10 year old?

102Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:14

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?

I support breads ban, yes. He brought kps wife into it.

In answer to your second question, ask yourself that very same question

103Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:14

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

whatsgoingon wrote:
scottjames30 wrote:Zzzzzzzzzzz great comeback , well done!!!!!!
Why are you behaving like a 10 year old
Give me an example of your estimation ?

104Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:15

Guest


Guest

Johnny,

This is exactly what the sad cunts want.

Sadly we now live in an age where winding people up on the internet is considered sport and whereas in the past, these sad cunts would have been getting drunk and then slapping their wives and kids about to make themselves feel big and strong, nowadays they do this instead.

You won't win and you'll just wind yourself up.

Honestly mate, don't waste your time.

If Sluffy wanted to he'd ban these sad cunts but he won't because all he's arsed about is counting posts and being able to stick two fingers up at the other Bolton sites out there and crow about how popular Nuts is.

Yeah, it's busy but 90% of it is this shite and if he's happy with that, fair enough - it's his site.

But that doesn't mean the rest of us have to join in.

Don't give the sad cunts the satisfaction.

105Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:16

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Talking of sad cunts.

106Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:16

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

You're the biggest wind up on here, breadman. You've got some nerve

107Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:16

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?
The points valid, people knew about the nationality of KPs wife so that was a true breach of anonymity, but if someone on here PMs me and calls me fatboy it's irrelevant because they don't know whether I am or not.
If someone that knew me came on and said it that's different. Whichever way you look at it though Scotts behaving like a cock, or an attention seeking child

108Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:16

Guest


Guest

Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?

I support breads ban, yes. He brought kps wife into it.

In answer to your second question, ask yourself that very same question

Where am I demanding Bread isn't banned in the way you have with Scott? 

I just find it odd you spend so much time on him to be honest. You're around my age I think, just seems a weird way to behave why do you care about a 40 odd year old so much that you've never met?

109Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:18

Guest


Guest

whatsgoingon wrote:The points valid, people knew about the nationality of KPs wife so that was a true breach of anonymity, but if someone on here PMs me and calls me fatboy it's irrelevant because they don't know whether I am or not.
If someone that knew me came on and said it that's different. Whichever way you look at it though Scotts behaving like a cock, or an attention seeking child

You're not aware of the history, Johnny has made it clear on here a few times he's sensitive about his weight. Hence the importance of it.

KP has also made people aware on the forum about his wife's nationality previously in an open thread.

110Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:19

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?

I support breads ban, yes. He brought kps wife into it.

In answer to your second question, ask yourself that very same question

Where am I demanding Bread isn't banned in the way you have with Scott? 

I just find it odd you spend so much time on him to be honest. You're around my age I think, just seems a weird way to behave why do you care about a 40 odd year old so much that you've never met?
I'm early thirties , sorry you thought I was forty.

111Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:20

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?

I support breads ban, yes. He brought kps wife into it.

In answer to your second question, ask yourself that very same question

Where am I demanding Bread isn't banned in the way you have with Scott? 

I just find it odd you spend so much time on him to be honest. You're around my age I think, just seems a weird way to behave why do you care about a 40 odd year old so much that you've never met?

I don't take this thing as seriously as you do, I don't care about any of it. It's all funny and games but unfortunately certain people get personal, vicious and take it too seriously.

Have you ever seen me be as vicious or nasty as breadman can be?

Have you ever seen me play the victim like Johnny does?

Have you ever seen me randomly insult or attack someone when we've been getting along? 

I'll only ever retaliate or defend someone. And even then I'm never 100% serious

112Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:22

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Breadman is better than Amos with this breakdown shit, it's  funny as fuck!!!!

113Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:23

Guest


Guest

Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.



Last edited by bwfc1874 on Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:23; edited 1 time in total

114Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:23

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

bwfc1874 wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:The points valid, people knew about the nationality of KPs wife so that was a true breach of anonymity, but if someone on here PMs me and calls me fatboy it's irrelevant because they don't know whether I am or not.
If someone that knew me came on and said it that's different. Whichever way you look at it though Scotts behaving like a cock, or an attention seeking child

You're not aware of the history, Johnny has made it clear on here a few times he's sensitive about his weight. Hence the importance of it.

KP has also made people aware on the forum about his wife's nationality previously in an open thread.
I'm aware of the fact KP has discussed his wife's nationality on open forum which is why I'm saying to bring it up and use if is out of order, but you're right I had no knowledge of Johnnys sensitivity about his weight so that makes Scott an even more despicable cunt. And to be fair I think he's trying to get banned to play the martyr.
With the information you've given he should be warned and then banned

115Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:24

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc1874 wrote:Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.

Because he knows the real me.

116Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:24

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc1874 wrote:Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.

You haven't, you are a liar

117Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:25

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:So a stranger who has never seen you calls you fat. What's the problem?

Didn't you support Bread's ban for him mentioning the nationality of Karly's wife? 

I don't understand why you're so loyal to a middle aged bloke you've met on the internet?

I support breads ban, yes. He brought kps wife into it.

In answer to your second question, ask yourself that very same question

Where am I demanding Bread isn't banned in the way you have with Scott? 

I just find it odd you spend so much time on him to be honest. You're around my age I think, just seems a weird way to behave why do you care about a 40 odd year old so much that you've never met?

I don't take this thing as seriously as you do, I don't care about any of it. It's all funny and games but unfortunately certain people get personal, vicious and take it too seriously.

Have you ever seen me be as vicious or nasty as breadman can be?

Have you ever seen me play the victim like Johnny does?

Have you ever seen me randomly insult or attack someone when we've been getting along? 

I'll only ever retaliate or defend someone. And even then I'm never 100% serious
Which is exactly how an Internet forum should be used

118Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:26

Guest


Guest

Boggers,

Bit of honest advice:

You're too close to whoever's behind the Scott character and you need to put some distance between you for your own good.

My last comment was more aimed at him because he's a nasty fucker and your shtick's a bit more palatable / less offensive than his.

You're obviously not stupid but you're being played and you're making yourself look like a cunt by constantly backing the prick up.

There's a line and that cunt consistently crosses it on here.

Don't let the sad wanker drag you over it with him.

119Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:28

Guest


Guest

Boggersbelief wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:Yes I have seen you get personal, play the victim and throw insults about. The not taking it seriously thing is great though, fair play to you.

But none of that has anything to do with my question, what's with the attraction to Scott? Just doesn't make any sense to me? You spend 90% of your time on here involved in a back and forth defending him or supporting him.

You haven't, you are a liar

You've changed your 'persona' more recently but there was a time when you absolutely did do all of those things. 

But again it's irrelevant to my question of why you spend so much time defending and supporting Scott.

120Referendum rules should be this...  - Page 6 Empty Re: Referendum rules should be this... Sun Jul 03 2016, 20:29

whatsgoingon

whatsgoingon
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Breadman wrote:Boggers,

Bit of honest advice:

You're too close to whoever's behind the Scott character and you need to put some distance between you for your own good.

My last comment was more aimed at him because he's a nasty fucker and your shtick's a bit more palatable / less offensive than his.

You're obviously not stupid but you're being played and you're making yourself look like a cunt by constantly backing the prick up.

There's a line and that cunt consistently crosses it on here.

Don't let the sad wanker drag you over it with him.
Good post and if you could back it up by acknowledging bringing KPs wife into it was also wrong then maybe this unpleasantness can be forgotten.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 6 of 9]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum