Anyway, did you have a nice break, Johnny?
Johnny 3.0
+11
karlypants
DEANO82
Sluffy
xmiles
Copper Dragon
Norpig
Bwfc1958
Bread2.0
boltonbonce
scottjames30
Natasha Whittam
15 posters
42 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:18
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
"How pathetic from (so called) grown men?"
That isn't a question.
If you stick a banana up your arse, you're not a fruit bowl so shoving a question mark on a statement doesn't make it a question.
That isn't a question.
If you stick a banana up your arse, you're not a fruit bowl so shoving a question mark on a statement doesn't make it a question.
43 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:18
Guest
Guest
Busy thanks Scott. Having a down day today which is well overdue.scottjames30 wrote:Anyway, did you have a nice break, Johnny?
45 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:20
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
something has to after that shameful performance.y2j 3.0 wrote:Cheers buddy. Thought it might cheer you up after that shite today.Norpig wrote:welcome back Mate
can't even have a quiet night in as my Daughter has one of her friends staying over
46 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:20
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2j 3.0 wrote:There are no mods on. How thick?
I'm afraid the mods aren't all highlighted.
Anyway, once you apologise for your ponceness all will be forgotten.
47 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:20
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
You'd have to leave the skin on. I find it impossible once they're peeled.Bread2.0 wrote:"How pathetic from (so called) grown men?"
That isn't a question.
If you stick a banana up your arse, you're not a fruit bowl so shoving a question mark on a statement doesn't make it a question.
48 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:21
Guest
Guest
Oh ffs. Giggling and screeching all night for you then!!!!!
Stick the headphones on
Stick the headphones on
49 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:21
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:"How pathetic from (so called) grown men?"
That isn't a question.
If you stick a banana up your arse, you're not a fruit bowl so shoving a question mark on a statement doesn't make it a question.
Sryia is not a country either, look at a world map you prehistoric cave man, go bang some rocks together in your cave and try to light a fire.
50 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:22
Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
When your daughter is 21 you'll be loving it when she has a friend over....Norpig wrote:something has to after that shameful performance.y2j 3.0 wrote:Cheers buddy. Thought it might cheer you up after that shite today.Norpig wrote:welcome back Mate
can't even have a quiet night in as my Daughter has one of her friends staying over
51 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:23
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Can I be in your band if the rocks make a musical sound?
52 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 19:27
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Not really, no!Bread2.0 wrote:Can I be in your band if the rocks make a musical sound?
57 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sat Oct 01 2016, 23:50
Sluffy
Admin
I'm really pleased to see you back Johnny.
I'm not really pleased though to see the same old hidden agendas from one or two people got dusted off again.
I really don't get the point of trying to wind up/piss off certain folk or play meaningless Machiavellian games to seek revenge in return, on a forum where the vast majority of people don't even know who each other is, or ever likely even meet them in real life!
What is the big deal in seeing if you can get an internet reaction from someone you don't know or attempting to get people banned (or should that be band?) because they pissed on your chips?
Christ my real life might be sad enough already but at least I've not got to the stage where something said or done on the internet actually effects me.
Call me all the names under the Sun if you like - they are only words - they don't hurt me. Go and get me banned from here too if you want - I've already been banned from most other BWFC forums and I've survived, so another one wont make that much difference to me.
We started Nuts up for a laugh - at least I did - and we wanted people to join in and share the laugh - and for a while it was good, really good - but like most things one or two had to spoil it for the rest of us - they thought (still think apparently) that their agendas and game playing are far more important than what the rest of us want - or deserve. They don't seem to get that if they 'kill' the forum through their games they actually 'kill off' themselves too because no one is left to play along with them any more - and if you want an example of that then look no further than Burnden Aces where the utterly bizarre fake account of bloke pretending to be a Scottish woman, posting on the forum in a mock Scottish accent, who is a pretend Celtic fan, who claims they support BWFC because Lennon became manager (even though he's long been sacked and moved on to another club) - is the only regular poster left on the whole forum!
Tell me where is the fun is for that person being the last one standing after everybody else has buggered off? And who the fuck would actually WANT to post on there now with that weirdo???
A forum NEEDS REAL people posting on it and there HAS to be some level of tolerance amongst each other for the forum to work.
If everybody is of the same mind, same humour, same intelligence, etc, then you might just as well talk to yourself - there is nothing new, different or challenging that comes out of everyone being alike.
Forums are a niche market these days - not many people prefer to spend their time socialising on them - the majority now Facebook, tweet, snapchat and all other more trendier and with it things.
In all honesty there is probably only a couple of dozen regular posters on any of the big three BWFC forums and if you manage to piss say a handful of them off your forum quickly becomes very quiet and dull.
If you want Nuts to crash and burn then please carry on until one side wins the 'internet' war and the other side buggers off - see what a pyrrhic victory that turns out to be.
Welcome back Johnny, just be yourself, have fun.
Let those with their agendas get on with their little games, don't get caught up in them. Rise above it.
Life's to short.
I'm not really pleased though to see the same old hidden agendas from one or two people got dusted off again.
I really don't get the point of trying to wind up/piss off certain folk or play meaningless Machiavellian games to seek revenge in return, on a forum where the vast majority of people don't even know who each other is, or ever likely even meet them in real life!
What is the big deal in seeing if you can get an internet reaction from someone you don't know or attempting to get people banned (or should that be band?) because they pissed on your chips?
Christ my real life might be sad enough already but at least I've not got to the stage where something said or done on the internet actually effects me.
Call me all the names under the Sun if you like - they are only words - they don't hurt me. Go and get me banned from here too if you want - I've already been banned from most other BWFC forums and I've survived, so another one wont make that much difference to me.
We started Nuts up for a laugh - at least I did - and we wanted people to join in and share the laugh - and for a while it was good, really good - but like most things one or two had to spoil it for the rest of us - they thought (still think apparently) that their agendas and game playing are far more important than what the rest of us want - or deserve. They don't seem to get that if they 'kill' the forum through their games they actually 'kill off' themselves too because no one is left to play along with them any more - and if you want an example of that then look no further than Burnden Aces where the utterly bizarre fake account of bloke pretending to be a Scottish woman, posting on the forum in a mock Scottish accent, who is a pretend Celtic fan, who claims they support BWFC because Lennon became manager (even though he's long been sacked and moved on to another club) - is the only regular poster left on the whole forum!
Tell me where is the fun is for that person being the last one standing after everybody else has buggered off? And who the fuck would actually WANT to post on there now with that weirdo???
A forum NEEDS REAL people posting on it and there HAS to be some level of tolerance amongst each other for the forum to work.
If everybody is of the same mind, same humour, same intelligence, etc, then you might just as well talk to yourself - there is nothing new, different or challenging that comes out of everyone being alike.
Forums are a niche market these days - not many people prefer to spend their time socialising on them - the majority now Facebook, tweet, snapchat and all other more trendier and with it things.
In all honesty there is probably only a couple of dozen regular posters on any of the big three BWFC forums and if you manage to piss say a handful of them off your forum quickly becomes very quiet and dull.
If you want Nuts to crash and burn then please carry on until one side wins the 'internet' war and the other side buggers off - see what a pyrrhic victory that turns out to be.
Welcome back Johnny, just be yourself, have fun.
Let those with their agendas get on with their little games, don't get caught up in them. Rise above it.
Life's to short.
58 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sun Oct 02 2016, 00:43
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Do you think I've got an agenda?
Not saying that you're wrong necessarily, just interested to hear how you're going to spin your response.
You're obviously happy to allow Whittam to keep stirring up the shit with "her" repeated appeals for clemency if one of the "more controversial" characters gets banned for causing trouble, as witnessed by the indecent haste with which you reinstated both (the) Boggersbelief (character) and (the) Scottjames30 (character) about three minutes after Whittam posted a thread requesting (the) Bogersbelief (character)'s return.
"We're all grown ups so can we please pretend that we get along and keep the post count up so that I can keep looking down my nose at BA and the other losers" was pretty much how it came across at the time.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Not a dig at Whittam by the way - One of the few contributors to this site who keeps things interesting and I generally respect that and enjoy it.
(It's "too short" by the way.)
Not saying that you're wrong necessarily, just interested to hear how you're going to spin your response.
You're obviously happy to allow Whittam to keep stirring up the shit with "her" repeated appeals for clemency if one of the "more controversial" characters gets banned for causing trouble, as witnessed by the indecent haste with which you reinstated both (the) Boggersbelief (character) and (the) Scottjames30 (character) about three minutes after Whittam posted a thread requesting (the) Bogersbelief (character)'s return.
"We're all grown ups so can we please pretend that we get along and keep the post count up so that I can keep looking down my nose at BA and the other losers" was pretty much how it came across at the time.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Not a dig at Whittam by the way - One of the few contributors to this site who keeps things interesting and I generally respect that and enjoy it.
(It's "too short" by the way.)
59 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sun Oct 02 2016, 08:18
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Can someone please explain to me what's grown up about a grown man pulling a strop every few weeks, deleting his account like a child, then coming back expecting the piss not to be taken?
As I've said, if you want to fuck off then just stop posting. Deleting your account is just attention seeking.
This forum is quiet because BWFC are shit and people are losing interest. It's that simple.
As I've said, if you want to fuck off then just stop posting. Deleting your account is just attention seeking.
This forum is quiet because BWFC are shit and people are losing interest. It's that simple.
60 Re: Johnny 3.0 Sun Oct 02 2016, 09:06
Sluffy
Admin
Bread2.0 wrote:Do you think I've got an agenda?
Not saying that you're wrong necessarily, just interested to hear how you're going to spin your response.
Bread2.0 wrote:I can't speak for Johnny bit I only deleted mine in an effort to force the hands of "the ownership" into doing something about the idiot twins.
And it worked.
You've got to see the bigger picture and play the long game sometimes.
Yes, they're both back (as we all knew they would be) but a marker was put down and a line established.
Job done.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum