Bread2.0 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I posted this link yesterday (post 31).
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Bread2.0 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
rammywhite wrote:wanderlust wrote:Foreign investors could be expected to set up a British company as a vehicle with an address of convenience in the UK for tax purposes and to take advantage of British Liability and Investment Laws. At least it's not just a PO Box for a change.
Yes they would- but they would use the HO of their legal advisers or Financial advisers as a convenience address. Not a private house in Yeovil.
And the big news was supposed to happen 24 hours after the first announcement. That's now 72 hours ago.
It was the usual bollocks .
Sluffy wrote:rammywhite wrote:wanderlust wrote:Foreign investors could be expected to set up a British company as a vehicle with an address of convenience in the UK for tax purposes and to take advantage of British Liability and Investment Laws. At least it's not just a PO Box for a change.
Yes they would- but they would use the HO of their legal advisers or Financial advisers as a convenience address. Not a private house in Yeovil.
And the big news was supposed to happen 24 hours after the first announcement. That's now 72 hours ago.
It was the usual bollocks .
The 'good news' or Lusty's post?
rammywhite wrote:Sluffy wrote:rammywhite wrote:wanderlust wrote:Foreign investors could be expected to set up a British company as a vehicle with an address of convenience in the UK for tax purposes and to take advantage of British Liability and Investment Laws. At least it's not just a PO Box for a change.
Yes they would- but they would use the HO of their legal advisers or Financial advisers as a convenience address. Not a private house in Yeovil.
And the big news was supposed to happen 24 hours after the first announcement. That's now 72 hours ago.
It was the usual bollocks .
The 'good news' or Lusty's post?
Not Lusty's post- I'm never that rude or aggressive .
No-it's the Wanderers promising this and then promising that and it all turns out to be a non event. Its Nixon,Iles, KA and the lot of them suggesting that something important is going to happen, but it never does. That's the usual bollocks!!
If you call presenting an alternative perspective to media propaganda for the purposes of stimulating discussion on a ....erm...discussion forum as wumming you'd be right.Sluffy wrote:rammywhite wrote:Sluffy wrote:rammywhite wrote:wanderlust wrote:Foreign investors could be expected to set up a British company as a vehicle with an address of convenience in the UK for tax purposes and to take advantage of British Liability and Investment Laws. At least it's not just a PO Box for a change.
Yes they would- but they would use the HO of their legal advisers or Financial advisers as a convenience address. Not a private house in Yeovil.
And the big news was supposed to happen 24 hours after the first announcement. That's now 72 hours ago.
It was the usual bollocks .
The 'good news' or Lusty's post?
Not Lusty's post- I'm never that rude or aggressive .
No-it's the Wanderers promising this and then promising that and it all turns out to be a non event. Its Nixon,Iles, KA and the lot of them suggesting that something important is going to happen, but it never does. That's the usual bollocks!!
Iles or any other journalist wouldn't wait a day to break a good story in fear of someone else scooping them so the 'good news' promised was never going to amount to much.
Lusty's turned into the site wum these days so I guess your 'phrase' could equally well apply to both!
Bread2.0 wrote:I was very, very pissed.
Apologies all round.
No. I take that as read.Bread2.0 wrote:What, that I got drunk and made myself look like a bit of a dick?
Not really news that, is it?
It's like saying "Sky is blue" or "water is wet".
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum