Sluffy wrote:Do you actual read posts fully first or just go off on one after the first sentence?
Yes I do actually. If I read your posts and then disagree, it's my right to say why. 2 replies from you and 2 unnecessary comments about me personally now, Sluffy. Not great.
Sluffy wrote:
I’ve already dealt with these points in my previous post –
He probably gets calls from Coyle and Skype and other such social media contacts but there really is nothing better to make you feel important than someone to go out of there way to see you personally.
I don't think you did "deal with this point", I can't see anything about writing a letter in there - apologies if I have missed that, but writing a letter is considered far more personal than social media and Skype IMO. If you disagree, fine, just say that.
Sluffy wrote:
As for this I think there may be massive difference prise wise between paying for the WHOLE of the squad and backroom staff to go to the Middle East (and what fucking good did it do them results wise!) and Coyle and maybe one or two others popping over to the States to see a much valued and long term injured colleague!
Yes, of course there is a massive price difference between transporting 3-4 people to the USA and 30-odd people to the Middle East.
However, at a time when the club was making staff redundant, you're wanting the club to have spent crazy money on people delivering a parcel in person, I think that can be far more easily described as wasteful than a football training camp for footballers to get warm weather training.
Sluffy wrote:
Well if you’ve been dealing with 200, twenty something year old millionaires, then I will stand corrected by you but somehow I doubt you have.
No not really, you don't have to manage millionaires to appreciate that (to quote you) :
"It's the little things that are the most important to people and what they remember the longest - seems that neither you or Coyle know nor understand this"
You're on very thin ground making blind assumptions about me or anyone else, you can speak about someone like Coyle with knowledge because his work is in the public eye - mine isn't, and on a general note it's unwise just to assume you're talking to someone who "doesn't know or doesn't understand" something just because they happen to disagree with you - a bit patronising really.
Sluffy wrote:
Management of resources has to be relevant to the environment in which you are in. They give out awards at McDonalds for management I believe, I’m not sure that this would necessarily mean that they are good managers in say a professional environment – or indeed visa versa.
Not that I've ever worked for McDonalds or anyone in their industry, but I don't doubt they have some very strong managers in such a successful company.