When Anderson arrived at the club to "save us" from going into administration Eddie was still alive, the club had assets in excess of 50 million, we had some good young saleable players, and a fanbase that was right behind the club.
Going into administration at that time would have been painful and a few egos would have been damaged in the process, but with the assets we had there was a decent chance of finding a degree of stability and even a wealthy owner when the dust settled.
After almost three years of running the club into the ground we are again faced with the prospect of administration, only this time with less assets, more debts, less saleable young players and a fanbase that is doing their best to stay loyal to a club that is giving them nothing but misery on and off the pitch. If we are to go into administration now, it's pretty clear (to me at least) that we'll come out of it with far less than we would have done had we faced the music and sorted our house out before Anderson got his hands on our club.
And yet there's the possibility of someone else taking Anderson's shares, but given our financial situation and the imminent prospect of relegation, I agree with Sluffy that we are no longer an attractive proposition for quality investors. To me that implies that unless Anderson is prepared to give his shares away - or pay someone to take them off his grubby hands - we may get a stay of execution by selling to another unfit owner and/or a chancer who sees our demise as an opportunity to turn a quick buck. Which in turn is likely to lead us further down the same road to administration or even liquidation.
As you know, I believe we'd have been better off biting the bullet back in 2015/16 rather than endure the debacle of Anderson's tenure.
Anyone disagree? If so, why? Where's the silver lining?
Going into administration at that time would have been painful and a few egos would have been damaged in the process, but with the assets we had there was a decent chance of finding a degree of stability and even a wealthy owner when the dust settled.
After almost three years of running the club into the ground we are again faced with the prospect of administration, only this time with less assets, more debts, less saleable young players and a fanbase that is doing their best to stay loyal to a club that is giving them nothing but misery on and off the pitch. If we are to go into administration now, it's pretty clear (to me at least) that we'll come out of it with far less than we would have done had we faced the music and sorted our house out before Anderson got his hands on our club.
And yet there's the possibility of someone else taking Anderson's shares, but given our financial situation and the imminent prospect of relegation, I agree with Sluffy that we are no longer an attractive proposition for quality investors. To me that implies that unless Anderson is prepared to give his shares away - or pay someone to take them off his grubby hands - we may get a stay of execution by selling to another unfit owner and/or a chancer who sees our demise as an opportunity to turn a quick buck. Which in turn is likely to lead us further down the same road to administration or even liquidation.
As you know, I believe we'd have been better off biting the bullet back in 2015/16 rather than endure the debacle of Anderson's tenure.
Anyone disagree? If so, why? Where's the silver lining?