boltonbonce wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Yes I agree, he just argues for the sake of it.
We all know that by now.
boltonbonce wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Ten Bobsworth wrote:Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:What do you mean why mention it? How else do you explain to readers why the players stopped getting paid?
Are you for real - that is the whole point that is being made!
The CLUB pays the wages NOT Anderson.
Iles states ANDERSON WITHDREW HIS funding for the players wages.
Anderson was never responsible for the wages - the CLUB was!
The players stopped getting paid because the CLUB ran out of money and NOT because Anderson withdrew HIS FUNDING of them.
The clear implication being that the players (and club employees) weren't being paid because Anderson had decided not to pay them anymore even though he had personal wealth to do so.
I'm afraid I despair of it all, Sluffy. These people are not interested in the truth or the facts but only interested in suppressing it and making any feeble excuse they can think of for their conduct.
I hope it will change but I doubt it will. Its gone too far, way too far and there seems to be a collective mendacity every bit as contagious as corona virus.
Sorry, Boncey, but I'm not having it that somebody who mentions Woodward and Bernstein has never had any interest in Watergate. My apologies if it wasn't you.boltonbonce wrote:Er, I don't think I've ever mentioned Watergate on here, but never mind. I'm sorry if my levels of concentration aren't up to scratch, but I have a lot to deal with. Hiding my google search history is almost a full time job.
We're not deliberately pushing all your buttons Bob, we're simply looking for the mute button.
Everyone needs a hobby.Norpig wrote:Jesus Boncey stop encouraging him!
All I know about the case is hearsay but I suspect he got caught bending the rules in his favour and, because he was a professionally qualified individual and wouldn't co-operate with the Official Receiver, they took him to the cleaners.boltonbonce wrote:I have an interest in politics in general Bob, but watergate hasn't really been mentioned a lot on here.
As for Ken Anderson, nothing tells me he broke the law. Until anyone proves otherwise I'll go with that.
He was however disqualified from being a company director for 8 years.
Could you enlighten me as to why?
Do you have proof of this Bonce?boltonbonce wrote:He was found guilty of diverting funds
receivable by a company into personal accounts, VAT discrepancies, and failure
to cooperate with Receivers.
It's in the records of the Insolvency Service. The reasons for his ban are well known.karlypants wrote:Do you have proof of this Bonce?boltonbonce wrote:He was found guilty of diverting funds
receivable by a company into personal accounts, VAT discrepancies, and failure
to cooperate with Receivers.
Thingy.Cajunboy wrote:Who?
I'd no problem with him appointing Phil Parkinson and challenging some of the inherited contracts that were not in the best interests of the club.boltonbonce wrote:I should add, when he came to the Wanderers he'd served his ban, and I had no problem with letting him take the helm.
I'm just glad he's gone, and I wish we could stop talking about him. I certainly won't be mentioning him again.
Last edited by Ten Bobsworth on Sat Mar 14 2020, 14:44; edited 1 time in total
Ten Bobsworth wrote:Sluffy wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:What do you mean why mention it? How else do you explain to readers why the players stopped getting paid?
Are you for real - that is the whole point that is being made!
The CLUB pays the wages NOT Anderson.
Iles states ANDERSON WITHDREW HIS funding for the players wages.
Anderson was never responsible for the wages - the CLUB was!
The players stopped getting paid because the CLUB ran out of money and NOT because Anderson withdrew HIS FUNDING of them.
The clear implication being that the players (and club employees) weren't being paid because Anderson had decided not to pay them anymore even though he had personal wealth to do so.
I'm afraid I despair of it all, Sluffy. These people are not interested in the truth or the facts but only interested in suppressing it and making any feeble excuse they can think of for their conduct.
I hope it will change but I doubt it will. Its gone too far, way too far and there seems to be a collective mendacity every bit as contagious as corona virus.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum