JOHN TERRY - GUILTY

Terry to face a four match ban and a fine of 220k

deserved or is he the victim?

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Terry to face a four match ban and a fine of 220k

deserved or is he the victim?

I don't like the guy but it's been a witchhunt from day 1.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Terry to face a four match ban and a fine of 220k

deserved or is he the victim?

I don't like the guy but it's been a witchhunt from day 1.

ooohhh....

Hipster_Nebula wrote:



ooohhh....

Stop using those smileys you idiot, I have no idea what they mean.

I told you thats apoplectic rage.

So why are you in a rage?

You defending Terry.

I'm not surprised but I'm still disgusted.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:You defending Terry.

I'm not surprised but I'm still disgusted.

No you're not. What idiot thinks it's right that you can be found 'not guilty' in a court of law, but 'guilty' by bunch of dickheads at the FA.

And you accuse me of sticking up for "overpaid ponses"

how the tables have turned.

and what a player to defend.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:And you accuse me of sticking up for "overpaid ponses"

how the tables have turned.

and what a player to defend.

I prefer the old Hipster.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:And you accuse me of sticking up for "overpaid ponses"

how the tables have turned.

and what a player to defend.

I prefer the old Hipster.

What are you talking about, racism always has and always will disgust me.

I don't care for it.

Probably the right decision.

He admitted using the offensive language in a court of law but was surprisingly acquitted. Fortunately the FA do not have to apply the same stringent tests as a court of law and can make a judgement based on the ' balance of probabilities' which they did.

It was the right decision because you have to set a high example as a deterrent to others.

On the other hand, talk about having two bites of the cherry!

I think he got what he deserved. I am quite livid that racism is alive and well.

If the FA put the same time and effort into pursuing the divers football would be a better place. But no, they'd rather pursure a man who has already been found 'not guilty' in a court of law.

This isn't about racism, this is about the FA flexing their muscles at an easy target.

The give Suarez an 8 match ban plus a fine. Suarez is a foreigner and being in England for a short time his use of words was wrong (although in Holland the use of the N is still commonplace and in everyday language so you cannot say with him playing in holland he should have known the difference when that is just a fallacy) and he got punished for it, deservedly so.



John Terry born and bred in england basically uses the same sort of language only gets a 4 match ban and a much smaller fine.



Pathetic how the FA treats a foreigner with utter contempt and yet when it comes to an English person, who has grown up knowing what words one can and cannot say in public, is treated with so much softly.



This is a complete injustice and JT should have been banned for more than 8 games. And the fine, not worth the paper the figures are printed on as he will recoup that within a couple or so weeks.

Saw think it's Martin Allen on Sky early this morning.

"I don't think he's a racist"

urmmmmm...