Euros 2020 - in 2021

Pretty sure I could find Karly calling Angela Merkel a Nazi numerous times if I wanted to. Let’s not pretend this is about fair treatment please.

Just finished watching the Wales game anyway, Ampadu has let them down really - Italy really took their foot off the gas in this game so it was a big opportunity for Wales - even with 10 men they should have got a point from Bale.

Glad Wales got through anyway it’s always to see a British team doing well, even if the feeling isn’t always mutual.

Sluffy wrote:

Do you think the bloke who used the phrase 'sheep shaggers' was prosecuted for the "intention to actually penetrate sheep"?

Of course he wasn't it how he used it as an insult that is now no longer deemed acceptable.

Yes maybe Wanderlust didn't use the exact words, nor used them in a derogatory meaning but if he had used the 'N' word in a semantic jocular way, would that have been acceptable?

Well would it?

I asked SIX times over TWO WEEKS for him to pack it in.

He was never going to do so was he???

I stated my exact reason for his ban at the time.

Enough was enough.

He brought the ban upon himself.

Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

It certainly wasn't me that acted unreasonably here, so don't make out that I've turned him into some sort of a martyr.

He fully deserved what he got and I have no regrets having done so.

As I said at the time...

There was zero malice in my post, Sluffy. Don’t presume everyone is out to get you just because they may offer an opinion that differs from yours. Like I said, the subject is closed for me.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

finlaymcdanger wrote:There was zero malice in my post, Sluffy. Don’t presume everyone is out to get you just because they may offer an opinion that differs from yours. Like I said, the subject is closed for me.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Fair enough.

and

You too.

Sluffy wrote:


Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

 I've said on many occasions you were as bad as each other so feel free to check back on that. As i said before the whole sheep shagger thing is just the excuse you needed to ban him as you've been looking to do it for a long time. If you knew he was winding you up why did you feel the need to always answer him?

boltonbonce wrote:
It was superb. Howard and Hilda are a joy.

I couldn't agree more but I kind of knew you would like it, Boncey. Maybe we've touched on this subject before.

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
I couldn't agree more but I kind of knew you would like it, Boncey. Maybe we've touched on this subject before.

Indeed. Perhaps we've met in another life.

Norpig wrote:

Sluffy wrote:
Maybe one or two of his mates who are seemingly attempting to make me out as the bad guy here, should have had a quiet word with him, asked him to be reasonable, to stop wumming me (if you really though that was all it was), to pack it in, to let it drop - but non of you did, did you?

 I've said on many occasions you were as bad as each other so feel free to check back on that. As i said before the whole sheep shagger thing is just the excuse you needed to ban him as you've been looking to do it for a long time. If you knew he was winding you up why did you feel the need to always answer him?

You seem to have a very selective memory.

I challenge YOU to go back over the history of the site and provided a single time where YOU asked/told Wanderlust to 'pack it in' BEFORE I replied to his (in your opinion) wumming and by God there must have be countless opportunities to find one!

Every time you stuck your beak in was to sound off at ME - never your mate!

More recently you have added on his name too but almost as an afterthought and never as the instigator - which wummers by definition always are!

You ask why didn't I sit back and take his wumming - why should I???

Why should I put up with the abuse and lies he posts when frankly all I've ever done was to call out the contents of some of his posts to be fake and misleading to others?

He could shoot me down quick enough by backing up his claims with facts and links to references and sources - but he never did.  I wonder why...

...was it because there was non to back up what he was saying???

I've explained many times in the past why I behave as I do, here's a recent full reply to you directly -

https://boltonnuts.forumotion.co.uk/t22630-happy-birthday-gloswhite#426806

This being the key sentence -

Sluffy wrote:Clearly both have issues that transcends a random internet footy forum whose only purpose is to talk about the club we all follow.

The solution to all this is easy.

They can ignore my posts, they can disagree but draw a line under it and move on, or they can go and post on another forum.

The question is, why don't they?

Once you can finally grasp that there must be something more to why he wouldn't, then maybe you could start to understand why I posted many times that 'games were being played on here' and that one or two posters put THEIR amusement/obsessions/agendas/call it what you will first and foremost and everybody else's enjoyment of the forum a long way second.


To be honest I know I am wasting my breath with you.

You've already made up your mind a long time back about me, that I'M the issue here and your mate Wanderlust is entirely blameless.

Well he isn't.

And I don't see why I should have to waste my life dealing with someone who doesn't wish to behaviour reasonably.

I gave him SIX warnings on the one subject, over TWO WEEKS and he followed me across THREE THREADS to do so AND he still was determined to carry on relentlessly and without any due regard to me or to anyone else's enjoyment of the forum!!!


Believe me if I was looking for an excuse to ban him I could have done that many, many times before now.

For one i don't know Lusty or you in real life so he isn't my mate. Secondly i wonder if i'm wasting my time on here as well if you think i'm sticking my beak in.

And before i go and take my selective memory elsewhere, one last thing

Let's all take a step back.

boltonbonce wrote:Let's all take a step back.

A daily dose of Ever Decreasing Circles for a week ought to do the trick, Boncey.

But not the new GB News channel.

Norpig wrote:For one i don't know Lusty or you in real life so he isn't my mate. Secondly i wonder if i'm wasting my time on here as well if you think i'm sticking my beak in.

And before i go and take my selective memory elsewhere, one last thing

You do what you have to mate.

And I mean 'mate' as informal use instead of referring to you as 'sir' or 'Mr Norpig' as more than someone I personally know.

And as for the cartoon, I've used it myself a number of times too.

I couldn't care a fig about someone being wrong on the internet (or in real life too) people believe what they want.

I will however try to give them the facts when I know them, up to them what they do thereafter but they do now have a chance to look into things for themselves instead of believing someone else's tale.

I'm not the one who argues to ad nauseum, I'm not the one who needs to be asked SIX times to stop doing something (that really he shouldn't be doing now in this day and age anyway).

And yes sticking your beak in from you or anyone else is welcomed if it is done fairly and genuinely.

So why then didn't you stick it in on the third, fourth, fifth or even sixth time that Wanderlust refused to stop doing what he was - why did you only do so to tell me it was all MY fault that he got himself a ban???

Norpig wrote:Ridiculous decision Sluffy, you've been itching to get rid of him for ages. Lusty hasn't helped himself with his constant wind-ups but he only did it because he knew you would bite and you fell for it everytime.

You've basically banned him because you don't like him or agree with him and not for some very far fetched excuse about racial slurs.

Doesn't that read as it is ok for him to troll me non stop but not for me to put an end to it after many request, over two weeks, for him to stop doing something he really shouldn't have been doing in the first place???

You clearly only see what you want to.

I can see you really are a pompous prick. I don't know whats happened to you over the last few years but you need help or to be dragged away from your computer.

You claim to not care what's said on the internet yet spend hours pulling up people on the smallest little thing and then merrily type 1000 words as a response. You can't stand to be wrong can you?

As for the racial slur it's laughable, are the internet police on their way to arrest Lusty for using the phrase sheep shagger? Are they fuck! 

It's your site at the end of the day but i'm not giving you the satisfaction of me leaving. The way things are going you'll end up alone on here arguing with yourself as everyone else will have given up and left.

Fair enough if that is how you see me to be.

No, the internet police aren't on the way to arrest Wanderlust but you'd be the first to complain if somebody used the 'N' word on here.

So where do you draw the line - is it ok to be offensive to some and not others in your world?

Look, all I asked him to do was to 'please' pack it in.

He deliberately chose not to.

What do you want me to do then - say it's ok on here to pick and choose who you want to be offensive too and who you don't?

I simply asked for people to be offensive to no one.

What exactly is the big deal in me doing that?

In your eyes I can do no right - and Wanderlust can do no wrong.

I can't change that.

I acted fairly and reasonably.

Wanderlust simply didn't.

If I am left on the site on my own then it probably would say something about my values of fairness and honesty were widely now obsolete in many peoples eyes who seem to prefer to believe what they read on social media to be true and laugh at the behaviour of the trolls and abusers on there.

I can't change the world but at least I'll still have kept some of the fake news and hatred from it off here.

The site that was originally just set up for a place of fun for all remember?

Sluffy wrote:Clearly both have issues that transcends a random internet footy forum whose only purpose is to talk about the club we all follow.

The solution to all this is easy.

They can ignore my posts, they can disagree but draw a line under it and move on, or they can go and post on another forum.

The question is, why don't they?

You have single-handedly sucked all the joy and fun out of this place Sluffy.

Its not about wrong or right, as i said i don't know either of you personally i can only go off what i read on here. Lusty did like to push your buttons but you are no angel in that front either are you? The phrases nut job and mentalist spring to mind.

Ignoring posts works both ways by the way, no one expects you to be the guardian of all that is right on the internet but you seem to think that's your role.

I'm sure away from here you are a decent bloke but for the last few years on here you have become as big a troll as the people you claim troll you.

I've felt like smashing my screen a few times lately as well Boncey 

Norpig wrote:I've felt like smashing my screen a few times lately as well Boncey 

I feel like that when I'm shaving. Some old bloke keeps staring back at me. 

Scary.

Sorry Cajun, I have some odd ways.