Whistle in the Wind

wanderlust wrote:
No Bob and if you'd care to read it properly you'd see that the King's Fund don't disagree with a single word I've written.

Or perhaps you in your wisdom could show me?

'an initiative of Tony Blair' was word-for-word exactly what the Kings Fund said and that you, presumably to make some point of little relevance, decided to challenge.

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2016/02/foundation-trust-model

You could try reading the books if you want to make yourself a bit more informed (and a bit less prejudiced).

Ten Bobsworth wrote:
'an initiative of Tony Blair' was word-for-word exactly what the Kings Fund said and that you, presumably to make some point of little relevance, decided to challenge.

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2016/02/foundation-trust-model

You could try reading the books if you want to make yourself a bit more informed (and a bit less prejudiced).

Ah - semantics....and you've not been very honest there have you Bob?

What the King's Fund actually said was "Foundation Trusts" were a Blair initiative. (I notice you did a Sluffy there and omitted the key element there )

What I said was that NHS trusts were initiated by Thatcher.

And foundation trusts are a form of NHS Trust aren't they Bob?

So I made the valid point that they were hardly a Blair initiative given what happened decades earlier. And I can hardly blame dick Murray as he would have been about 12 at the time.

So when I said it wasn't really Blair's initiative I was right wasn't I Bob?