Ten Bobsworth wrote:I believe that you are right, Sluffy, and that there was an anti-Anderson network involving Holdsworth, Iles and the ST whose roots lay in the Beeno's anti-Davies and anti-Gartside stance. Sam Allardyce was linked-in too as evidenced by the unnecessary, erroneous and malevolent claims in his book.
But I suspect that there was more to Holdsworth joining forces with the ST and Iles solely in an anti-Anderson united front. I wouldn't expect Dean Holdsworth to put himself out without some personal incentive but did someone owe him a favour for any reason, I wonder?
Think about it.
No sorry Bob, I don't know what you are hinting at.
I do remember the ST putting themselves forward as the 'preferred bidder', in competition to Holdworth (and his then partner at the time - pre-Ken Anderson) and to a great extent I always thought Holdsworth was more or less a front for Eddie to 'sell' the club on to because Holdsworth had no money and the BluMarble loan was set against BWFC assets, so clearly Eddie must have known that pre-sale, as to how the club would be funded immediately after takeover.
If so the apparent duplicitous actions taken by Holdsworth to charge £1m up front for his services would have presumably soured the relationship?
All water under the bridge now though and I have no idea why the high and mighty at the University of Bolton saw fit to honour him unless they to also erroneously (like Wanderlust) believed he really saved the club from oblivion???