BRING BACK LUSTY

Whitesince63 wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:
Ha! What kind of a plonker has their own thread.

Cajunboy wrote:
There is this weird bloke in Warrington .

Spends his time reading the Beano and eating vegan pasties.

Takes all sorts.   ( not liquorice)

karlypants wrote:I read half of your last post and gave up. There is no reason to write an essay on the situation every time, nor is there any reason to constantly take a dig at him too.

You are the one who keeps taking the piss out of him and it isn't such a problem if he posts his fake news either.

My gripe was initially aimed at you to stop.

I give up.

okocha wrote:Apart from social media references, all the things Sluffy accuses Lusty of apply much more pertinently to himself. Extremely insulting, obsessively repetitive, harsh, aggressive etc.
 Lusty unsurprisingly defends himself when his every post is pounced on aggressively.  He also relates jokes to lighten the mood.

Lusty's views on the Tory party are well founded....I don't see them as hateful so much as appropriate.

WS 63 has the right idea in debating intelligently and largely politely with his opposing views on politics. The two of them seek to remain on good terms.

Hip Priest wrote:





Splendid summation of the situation by Karly, Okocha and W63. Unfortunately I fear these words will fall on deaf ears as always.

Mad Dog wrote:There is a heck of a lot of deadwood on this forum - Okocha, Whitesince, BoltonBonce - it is posters like this that really drag the place down. If I was Sluffy I’d just ban those three and clear the decks and start afresh. They’ve all got a chip on their shoulder. Definitely consider it Sluffy.

Mad Dog wrote:There is a heck of a lot of deadwood on this forum - Okocha, Whitesince, BoltonBonce - it is posters like this that really drag the place down. If I was Sluffy I’d just ban those three and clear the decks and start afresh. They’ve all got a chip on their shoulder. Definitely consider it Sluffy.

Whitesince63 wrote:
Cracking idea, then you can just talk to yourself MD.

Cajunboy wrote:Why can't I be banned?


It's probably because I've not been well.


Sluffy doesn't want to upset me.


Deep down Sluffy is a caring person, just misunderstood.

Natasha Whittam wrote:My ultimate goal is to have all of you banned so that I am the last one standing.

Who better to have an educated discussion with?

boltonbonce wrote:
He won't ban you. He puts money on your horses.

boltonbonce wrote:I suppose seeing you standing might be considered something of a novelty for some.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

This bullery will get you banned. Try mentioning slippers on WW and see what happens.

boltonbonce wrote:
Norpig and Bob are going to feel left out. Ban them too.