Holden - do we keep him or let him go?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:No way, he's injury prone now and he's been out for a couple of years, he will never get back to his best IMO, we cant nurse him forever.

At last, someone with a bit of sense.

What business would offer an employee a new contract after they'd been off sick for nearly two years?

Would rather have Stu with one leg than Pratley

Tigermin wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:No way, he's injury prone now and he's been out for a couple of years, he will never get back to his best IMO, we cant nurse him forever.

At last, someone with a bit of sense.

What business would offer an employee a new contract after they'd been off sick for nearly two years?

Would rather have Stu with one leg than Pratley

Now that's just being silly, Pratley has been playing well lately.

Anybody who reads my comments know that I believe players rarely come back from serious injury.....exceptions exist of course. I said last year that waiting on Holden & Lee to save us was daft. Anybody remember OC saying that we could be a top ten team if he had those two back.
Well Lee is back and only half the player he was. Holden I will give the rest of the season to prove himself again.....only because he was our best player. Remember that Doogie has never seen Holden's good days like us. So pay for play or a one year contract for me.

If he is not offered one now and then proves he is back to his best we could lose him for nowt, then again will he want a new contract on lower wages?