Time To Go Muslim?

It's true though.

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:It's true though.

It's not true. I don't believe you've read it. The Cat In The Hat is more your style.

The Prophet Muhammad was married to a young girl.

Definite nonce.

bwfc1874 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Women can't drive, Women can't vote, They will be no pubs, Infact women can't even go out without there husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there not Mingers.

PS it should be their and not there ("their" being personal, whilst "there" is directional)

Apart from that, it sounds good and Natasha would not be allowed on any Wanderers forum, or any football forum! Wouls she be allowed to go to football matches?

Pretty condescending stuff, you should at least get it right if you're trying to look clever.

It's 'As long as they're not mingers'

And would not wouls

"They're" is they are which is correct in Scotts post for his second faux-pas which I completely missed as I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

But to try to correct my spelling is a laugh as it is a typing error and not a gramatical error - which is completely different, due to teh fact I was not taught to type and had to teach myself and as such spelling mistakes will happen, although if hand-written they would not occur!!

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:The Prophet Muhammad was married to a young girl.

Definite nonce.

Have you seen some of the ages that out Englands Kings and Queens got married at, never mind the Romans or the Greeks or other religions!!!

Is it not the case that during Prophet Muhammad's time the average age of death was around 25 to 30 so people married and had sex younger, yes even in the UK!!

bwfc71 wrote: I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

Are you sure about this one? Their indicates ownership.

bwfc71 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Women can't drive, Women can't vote, They will be no pubs, Infact women can't even go out without there husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there not Mingers.

PS it should be their and not there ("their" being personal, whilst "there" is directional)

Apart from that, it sounds good and Natasha would not be allowed on any Wanderers forum, or any football forum! Wouls she be allowed to go to football matches?

Pretty condescending stuff, you should at least get it right if you're trying to look clever.

It's 'As long as they're not mingers'

And would not wouls

"They're" is they are which is correct in Scotts post for his second faux-pas which I completely missed as I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

But to try to correct my spelling is a laugh as it is a typing error and not a gramatical error - which is completely different, due to teh fact I was not taught to type and had to teach myself and as such spelling mistakes will happen, although if hand-written they would not occur!!

To be honest I coouldn't care less about any spelling or grammar mistakes, it's a football forum so long as I can understand what it says I don't really care.

I was correcting your spelling because I thought you correcting a minor error was a bit petty to be honest, so I thought I'd be petty over your posts.

Can't we all just get along?

Boggersbelief wrote:Can't we all just get along?

Is this your first day on a football forum?

Reebok Trotter wrote:

bwfc71 wrote: I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

Are you sure about this one? Their indicates ownership.

Good call, RT!

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:The Prophet Muhammad was married to a young girl.

Definite nonce.

Best looking up Roman Emperor Tiberius - much more shocking!

What's that got to do with anything?

They're all nonces if they were shagging kids.

The problem is alot of muslims still think it's ok.

Muslim abuser who 'didn't know' that sex with a girl of 13 was illegal is spared jail -


Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html#ixzz2NpfZub4q

I'm sure there are a lot more whites going to prison for shagging kids than Muslims.

Natasha Whittam wrote:I'm sure there are a lot more whites going to prison for shagging kids than Muslims.

Only in this country


We should all get along

It would be nice

If you project the census stats forward, it doesn't matter whether you fancy living Sharia Law, there will be no choice

And, we seem unable to stop it

Lyric Todkill wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:I'm sure there are a lot more whites going to prison for shagging kids than Muslims.

Only in this country


We should all get along

It would be nice

If you project the census stats forward, it doesn't matter whether you fancy living Sharia Law, there will be no choice

And, we seem unable to stop it

Sharia law is not something all Muslims support, only extremists.

It will never happen in England whatever the EDL may say.

bwfc1874 wrote:

Sharia law is not something all Muslims support, only extremists.

It will never happen in England whatever the EDL may say.

It will happen. Best to prepare yourself right now. Go and choose three wives.

Just to add to the scaremongering!!!!

https://youtu.be/6-3X5hIFXYU

Always makes me laugh.

No wonder most people think the EDL are knobheads.