Time To Go Muslim?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

Sharia law is not something all Muslims support, only extremists.

It will never happen in England whatever the EDL may say.

It will happen. Best to prepare yourself right now. Go and choose three wives.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:I think what would be better is if we ditched religious doctrine altogether.

bwfc71 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Women can't drive, Women can't vote, They will be no pubs, Infact women can't even go out without there husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there not Mingers.

PS it should be their and not there ("their" being personal, whilst "there" is directional)

Apart from that, it sounds good and Natasha would not be allowed on any Wanderers forum, or any football forum! Wouls she be allowed to go to football matches?

Pretty condescending stuff, you should at least get it right if you're trying to look clever.

It's 'As long as they're not mingers'

And would not wouls

"They're" is they are which is correct in Scotts post for his second faux-pas which I completely missed as I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

But to try to correct my spelling is a laugh as it is a typing error and not a gramatical error - which is completely different, due to teh fact I was not taught to type and had to teach myself and as such spelling mistakes will happen, although if hand-written they would not occur!!

Reebok Trotter wrote:

bwfc71 wrote: I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

Are you sure about this one? Their indicates ownership.

jayjay23 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Women can't drive, Women can't vote, They will be no pubs, Infact women can't even go out without there husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there not Mingers.

PS it should be their and not there ("their" being personal, whilst "there" is directional)

Apart from that, it sounds good and Natasha would not be allowed on any Wanderers forum, or any football forum! Wouls she be allowed to go to football matches?

Pretty condescending stuff, you should at least get it right if you're trying to look clever.

It's 'As long as they're not mingers'

And would not wouls

"They're" is they are which is correct in Scotts post for his second faux-pas which I completely missed as I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

But to try to correct my spelling is a laugh as it is a typing error and not a gramatical error - which is completely different, due to teh fact I was not taught to type and had to teach myself and as such spelling mistakes will happen, although if hand-written they would not occur!!

It should be...

Women can't drive, Women (women) can't vote, They (there) will be no pubs, Infact (in fact) women can't even go out without there (their) husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there (they're) not Mingers (mingers)

Reebok_Rebel wrote:Nats Most successful WUM yet...

Il die before we practice Sharia Law or even have a Muslim PM in this country.

Not only are they happy coming over here, breeding like rabbits, they also refuse point blank to live our way - they want to change the place in to a rainier and colder version of Pakistan or the middle east.

The immigrants of the 50s and 60s where hardworking, decent people looking for work - mainly from India, immigration nowadays is not about work - its about how much your quality of life will improve for free... taking from OUR pot on one hand, and on the other telling us we are all infidels and we are going to hell because we drink etc...

Drinking will get you sent to hell, however beating and raping your wife wont?

No sorry, makes no sense to me.

bwfc71 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

bwfc71 wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:Women can't drive, Women can't vote, They will be no pubs, Infact women can't even go out without there husbands.

Men are ok though, we can have 4 wives, I'm all for it .

As long as there not Mingers.

PS it should be their and not there ("their" being personal, whilst "there" is directional)

Apart from that, it sounds good and Natasha would not be allowed on any Wanderers forum, or any football forum! Wouls she be allowed to go to football matches?

Pretty condescending stuff, you should at least get it right if you're trying to look clever.

It's 'As long as they're not mingers'

And would not wouls

"They're" is they are which is correct in Scotts post for his second faux-pas which I completely missed as I was slightly miffed at the wrong spelling of the first faux-pas, being "their husbands" and not "there husbands"

But to try to correct my spelling is a laugh as it is a typing error and not a gramatical error - which is completely different, due to teh fact I was not taught to type and had to teach myself and as such spelling mistakes will happen, although if hand-written they would not occur!!

scottjames30 wrote:

O my god, how sad.

I hope BH twats you.

Fucking sad twat.

jayjay23 wrote:

I trust the mods will be stepping in on this kurdish comment.