It's not difficult to be balanced about it is it? The facts are that for whatever reason, our lot has improved immensely under Freedman - we're unbelieveably in with a chance of getting into the playoffs in a season where relegation was a real concern for a long time.Jamster26 wrote: as far as I'm concerned, it's so far, so good.
That doesn't mean he's the best or worst at anything and it's annoying that everything that happens is stated as an extreme one way or the other.
Jamsters got it right IMO - so far so good. Whether we end up getting promoted, getting close or failing miserably at the last hurdle we'll have to wait and see, but we wouldn't even be talking about playoffs and promotion if it weren't for the progress we've made under DF.
There will be changes in the summer whatever division we're in and so far DF hasn't made any obvious howlers in the transfer market so there's reason to be optimistic that when he finally gets a squad that he can call his own it will be as good as we can hope for in our position.
Sure we're scraping through by the skin of our teeth at the moment and every armchair manager would change this or that to make us more dominant and reduce our risk of conceding, but at least we're not in the position we were.
I think Freedman has done enough to deserve a bit of leeway in his decision making without getting slaughtered for it.