Get rid of CYL, Knight ,Mears, Mavies, Ngog, Holden, Eagles, in fact, it wouldn't bother me if any player goes come January .
January business..
+17
luckyPeterpiper
Reebok Trotter
wanderlust
Reebok_Rebel
Boggersbelief
gloswhite
scottjames30
Wolton Banderers
Norpig
Whitesince63
Triumph
Natasha Whittam
Culcheth_White
rammywhite
terenceanne
BoltonTillIDie
aaron_bwfc
21 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
22 Re: January business.. Sun Dec 29 2013, 19:10
Whitesince63
El Hadji Diouf
Keep all the players, get rid of Freedman and you'd see a massive difference in the quality of play. Added to that we wouldn't have to listen to all the bullshit and garbage he comes out with before and after games.
23 Re: January business.. Sun Dec 29 2013, 22:51
terenceanne
El Hadji Diouf
Here 20 mill out of my own pocket ..... go buy Baines for left back..... here's another 5 mill for Dawson.
Now we are a good team right ???
Nonsense...... poor team selection and tactics have cost us more games this season than shuffling left backs.
I would expect a hammering today but all those earlier games blown with piss poor decision making...that's the thing costing us this season.
Now we are a good team right ???
Nonsense...... poor team selection and tactics have cost us more games this season than shuffling left backs.
I would expect a hammering today but all those earlier games blown with piss poor decision making...that's the thing costing us this season.
24 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 09:08
Whitesince63
El Hadji Diouf
terenceanne wrote:Here 20 mill out of my own pocket ..... go buy Baines for left back..... here's another 5 mill for Dawson.
Now we are a good team right ???
Nonsense...... poor team selection and tactics have cost us more games this season than shuffling left backs.
I would expect a hammering today but all those earlier games blown with piss poor decision making...that's the thing costing us this season.
25 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 15:20
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Yesterday we played arguably the best team in the league at their ground and scored 3 good goals. But we conceded 5 and gave away a stupid penalty.
All 5 goals could have been prevented and 3 (plus the pen) were down to individual errors.
The system we play is flawed and despite having holding midfielders, we continue to get exposed at the back.
It's not rocket science. We stick the likes of Spearing in the middle so we don't have a soft centre and yet again the opposition simply bypasses them by going wide and yet again all the goals come from the flanks - including another OG from a ball across the box.
Change the system and push back their wide players - job done.
All 5 goals could have been prevented and 3 (plus the pen) were down to individual errors.
The system we play is flawed and despite having holding midfielders, we continue to get exposed at the back.
It's not rocket science. We stick the likes of Spearing in the middle so we don't have a soft centre and yet again the opposition simply bypasses them by going wide and yet again all the goals come from the flanks - including another OG from a ball across the box.
Change the system and push back their wide players - job done.
26 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 15:27
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
wanderlust wrote:
It's not rocket science. We stick the likes of Spearing in the middle so we don't have a soft centre and yet again the opposition simply bypasses them by going wide and yet again all the goals come from the flanks - including another OG from a ball across the box.
Change the system and push back their wide players - job done.
So don't you agree that a manager who still hasn't worked this out should be shown the door immediately?
27 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 16:02
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:wanderlust wrote:
It's not rocket science. We stick the likes of Spearing in the middle so we don't have a soft centre and yet again the opposition simply bypasses them by going wide and yet again all the goals come from the flanks - including another OG from a ball across the box.
Change the system and push back their wide players - job done.
So don't you agree that a manager who still hasn't worked this out should be shown the door immediately?
He reads my posts. Expect wholesale changes to the system within the month, something along the lines of
Lonergan
..............Threlkeld.............Baptiste.................Bolger
White................................Ream........................Riley
Hall...........................Mavies...........Moritz................Eagles
......................................Beckford
.
Last edited by wanderlust on Mon Dec 30 2013, 16:15; edited 1 time in total
28 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 16:11
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
i think if we could find a good centre half, we could push Ream into the defensive midfielder role, his passing is a million times better than Spearing, maybe Spearing could be better a bit further forward?
How about a 4-1-4-1 formation? Dougie won't play 2 up front so this may be the answer
How about a 4-1-4-1 formation? Dougie won't play 2 up front so this may be the answer
29 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 16:17
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Maybe Spearing would be better on the bench?
Have amended accordingly.
Have amended accordingly.
30 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 16:59
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman wrote:guidetti......?
Who's that?
It looks like City are loaning him to Malaga.
31 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 17:07
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
RT: I think we all know what we can expect over the next month or so. Why not rename this thread something like "Jackanuary" and make it sticky so that all the speculation can be relatively contained?
32 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 18:26
luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
Swearing alert, I am about to swear. You have been warned.wanderlust wrote:RT: I think we all know what we can expect over the next month or so. Why not rename this thread something like "Jackanuary" and make it sticky so that all the speculation can be relatively contained?
Rename it "Jack -SHIT-uary" and get ready to say "Happy New Phil does fuck all yet again" and you'll be spot on.
We might get one on loan but we won't buy a single player and anyone even half decent will be 'over priced' and 'out of our reach' as Fat Phil explains that 'we wont be held to ransom' because a player with twenty goals to his name this season already turns out to cost more than two stale custard creams and a used teabag.
Seriously, I can't even be arsed to watch the transfer window this time. January is Bolton's 'do nowt month' and this'll be no different. I might have a look on the Beeb text service on Feb 1st to see who we didn't get.
33 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 18:29
Guest
Guest
How many players did we sign in the window last year?
34 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 18:37
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Chelsea are ready to spark a January scrap by sending out wonderkid Jeremie Boga on loan. The midfielder, 16, is tipped to make a breakthrough at Stamford Bridge. The Blues want Boga to gain experience in the Championship first, with Bolton, Birmingham and Charlton set to fight for his services.
Last edited by Reebok Trotter on Mon Dec 30 2013, 23:33; edited 1 time in total
35 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 18:38
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
wanderlust wrote:RT: I think we all know what we can expect over the next month or so. Why not rename this thread something like "Jackanuary" and make it sticky so that all the speculation can be relatively contained?
Jackanory it is then!
36 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 18:58
Culcheth_White
Andy Walker
Dougie wanted him a while back and do we need another attacking midfielder? I would rather have Ryan Bertrand at left back, seeing as though Chelsea still owe us a loan player, but from what I've heard we won't be doing the choosing with regards to what player Chelsea will loan us.Reebok Trotter wrote:Chelsea are ready to spark a January scrap by sending out wonderkid Jeremie Boga on loan. the midfielder, 16, is tipped to make a breakthrough at Stamford Bridge. The Blues want Boga to gain experience in the Championship first, with Bolton, Birmingham and Charlton set to fight for his services.
37 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 19:22
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
LPP - If you can go an entire month without commenting on the ludicrous speculation on unrealistic targets that we get every year I'll be truly amazed.luckyPeterpiper wrote:wanderlust wrote:RT: I think we all know what we can expect over the next month or so. Why not rename this thread something like "Jackanuary" and make it sticky so that all the speculation can be relatively contained?
Seriously, I can't even be arsed to watch the transfer window this time.
Dougie's failure to sign Dawson (and Ronaldhino) will at least spur you to call for his head yet again.
No way you'll keep schtum.
38 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 22:59
luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
Wanderlust I would appreciate it if you would at least get your facts a LITTLE bit straight mate. Show me one post, just ONE where I have EVER called for Dougie to be sacked let alone 'call for his head yet again'. I am one of the few on here who has consistently counselled patience until the end of this season before judging his fate and have done that very thing on the voting thread today.wanderlust wrote:LPP - If you can go an entire month without commenting on the ludicrous speculation on unrealistic targets that we get every year I'll be truly amazed.luckyPeterpiper wrote:wanderlust wrote:RT: I think we all know what we can expect over the next month or so. Why not rename this thread something like "Jackanuary" and make it sticky so that all the speculation can be relatively contained?
Seriously, I can't even be arsed to watch the transfer window this time.
Dougie's failure to sign Dawson (and Ronaldhino) will at least spur you to call for his head yet again.
No way you'll keep schtum.
As to Dougie's failure to sign anyone, it's not HIS failure at all, any more than it was Owen Coyle's before him. They have no control over the purse strings and the purse itself is (so far as published finances say) empty to the tune of MINUS 136 MILLION quid. If he's given the money to even sign a free I'll be surprised because it looks as though he's been told "sell to buy" and "Release to loan" somewhere along the line. I freely admit I don't KNOW for a fact he or Owen were told that but the way we have done almost nothing in the buying market and not a massive amount in loans would suggest it. Phil tells them what money they can't have and Dougie then will have to do what if anything he can. That's why I called it PHIL-does-fuck-all and not DOUGIE-does-nowt.
Be a good chap here wanderlust; at least check that you're right before deciding to post on something you think I've already said please?
39 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 23:39
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
LPP, I think you have misunderstood Wanderlust's comment. He actually bats for the same side as you and I. He wasn't having a go at you in any shape or form. He was referring to speculation about the January window. That's all this post is about. Pure speculation, nothing more, and sometimes where speculation is concerned, common sense and facts go out of the window.
40 Re: January business.. Mon Dec 30 2013, 23:47
luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
No Rt he is referring to me personally. Read his sentence.Reebok Trotter wrote:LPP, I think you have misunderstood Wanderlust's comment. He actually bats for the same side as you and I. He wasn't having a go at you in any shape or form. He was referring to speculation about the January window. That's all this post is about. Pure speculation, nothing more, and sometimes where speculation is concerned, common sense and facts go out of the window.
"Dougie's failure to sign Ronaaldinho and Dawson will spur you to call for his head yet again.
No way you'll keep schtum."
Not "the antie Dougie brigade", not "they", he says "you" and does it twice. I resent people putting words in my mouth at the best of times, to have it done by a complete stranger who could have damned well checked what I'd said before pontificating on it with a few clicks of a mouse is bloody well annoying and I won't leave it unanswered. I'm normally pretty mild mannered and quite reasonable but this one I won't let slide. If you are going to give your opinion of what I will or will not say you'd better either know me personally quite well or have some previous posts of mine as evidence to back yourself. It may sound petty but this is an issue I take seriously no matter what "side" wanderlust is on.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum