Would you take a defeat to see the end of Dougie?

Correct. His judgement,since Sam left,could be questioned on so many levels. The man's massive ego won't allow him to face the possibility that he might have got it wrong.

boltonbonce wrote:Correct. His judgement,since Sam left,could be questioned on so many levels. The man's massive ego won't allow him to face the possibility that he might have got it wrong.

He's expecting us to rename the ground in his honour


The Darkside Dump


After we fail to pay the rent and the owners decide it's worth more as a recycling centre

While i may not agree with some of the appointments post Big Sam I can see the logic behind all of them frankly.

hindsight is 20-20.

Makes no diference we are likely to lose the game anyway.

Win it then sack Doogie ....do somat diferent.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:While i may not agree with some of the appointments post Big Sam I can see the logic behind all of them frankly.

hindsight is 20-20.

HN, 'hindsight is 20-20'. What the hell is this supposed to mean? Is this you being enigmatic ?    (Maybe its changed, but I always thought the British measurement was actually 6-6 ?)

Personally I will not accept defeat under any circumstances whatsoever.

If this delays the inevitable then so be it!

We really need the points and a defeat at Millwall for the sake of dumping Dougie could be those 3 valuable points we need to stay up.

karlypants wrote: We really need the points and a defeat at Millwall for the sake of dumping Dougie could be those 3 valuable points we need to stay up.

 

What if we don't get the points, and keeping DF means we don't get enough in the remaining games ?
Nobody wants their team to lose, me included, but its not much fun watching the team melt away, knowing the current way of management isn't working. I would rather lose the game than the season.

gloswhite wrote:What if we don't get the points, and keeping DF means we don't get enough in the remaining games ?
Nobody wants their team to lose, me included, but its not much fun watching the team melt away, knowing the current way of management isn't working. I would rather lose the game than the season.

Endless possibilities! We live in hope?

dougie won't be sacked if we lose so it's a no from me.

If gartside were to be sacked with him then it would b a HELL YEAH but that won't happen and we need the points.

Barryjw wrote:

gloswhite wrote:What if we don't get the points, and keeping DF means we don't get enough in the remaining games ?
Nobody wants their team to lose, me included, but its not much fun watching the team melt away, knowing the current way of management isn't working. I would rather lose the game than the season.

Endless possibilities! We live in hope?

There's always hope BJW, even after today' draw  

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Whitesince63 wrote: Bollocks a new manager wouldn't make a difference, these players are under performing because of Freedman not because they're poor players.

I'm sorry, but you can't see that these are poor players you are more deluded than I first thought.

Not deluded Nat just realistic. We all accept this isn't the best squad we've ever had, far from it but if you think all our players are actually as bad as they are being made to look by our illustrious leader then you're the deluded one. We need a clear out that's for sure but it needs to start with the biggest problem first so Gartside then Freedman. Problem is there is something going on here none of us yet know about but it is certainly more than just football related. Nobody under performs in this business like Freedman and keeps his job. Something's not right here.

Do you mean DF has some tasty photos of the chairman in an uncompomising position.

popeyedoyle wrote:  Do you mean DF has some tasty photos of the chairman in an uncompomising position.

I think it might be a good deal more important than that.

Touché whitesince63. At least we can still smile whilst surrounded by negative boring mediocrity from Freedman.