Transfer rumours !

Natasha we could do with Ali Bongo's cousin!!!!!

Worst part of that lot is Andrews refusing to move on.

Getting him off the books may well be a major contributor to the salary Dougie would be able to offer an incoming striker.

The bastard is doing a Mears on us.

wanderlust wrote:
The bastard is doing a Mears on us.

I've not seen Andrews quoted as saying he doesn't want to play for us.

The way I see it, Dougie presumed Andrews would move on, it hasn't happened, and his ego won't let a quality player (on his Brighton form) back in the team.

You utter twat.

So quality Brighton don't want him back? It's a managers job to decide who's good enough and who isn't I doubt there's a Bolton fan out there who thinks Andrews is worth the £20,000 a week he's on here. I'd imagine (once again) that's the sticking point, nobody will pay him what he wants.

bwfc1874 wrote:You utter twat.

So quality Brighton don't want him back? It's a managers job to decide who's good enough and who isn't I doubt there's a Bolton fan out there who thinks Andrews is worth the £20,000 a week he's on here. I'd imagine (once again) that's the sticking point, nobody will pay him what he wants.

What a stupid post.

Everyone agrees he's vastly overpaid, but is that a reason not to give the guy a chance? Would you prefer him to sit at home and pick up £20k every week, or train with the first team and try and force his way in?

I think he played nearly every game for Brighton last season, the only reason they didn't want him is Bolton were paying half his wages while he was on loan.

You really are becoming a happy clapping ponce.

If Andrew's doesn't want to go, bring him back to the team, its one or the other.

Andrews had loads of game time at Bolton but he woefully underperformed. That's why Dougie got rid of him to Brighton.

Reebok Trotter wrote:Andrews had loads of game time at Bolton but he woefully underperformed. That's why Dougie got rid of him to Brighton.

The fact that he's crap, we have better players in his position and he is draining the lifeblood out of the club shouldn't be allowed to stand in the way of it being another (albeit spurious) reason to have a whinge.

You should know by now that everything is Freedman's fault.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:You utter twat.

So quality Brighton don't want him back? It's a managers job to decide who's good enough and who isn't I doubt there's a Bolton fan out there who thinks Andrews is worth the £20,000 a week he's on here. I'd imagine (once again) that's the sticking point, nobody will pay him what he wants.

What a stupid post.

Everyone agrees he's vastly overpaid, but is that a reason not to give the guy a chance? Would you prefer him to sit at home and pick up £20k every week, or train with the first team and try and force his way in?

I think he played nearly every game for Brighton last season, the only reason they didn't want him is Bolton were paying half his wages while he was on loan.

You really are becoming a happy clapping ponce.

Why are you defending a player taking £20,000 a week from us and is refusing to move on even though he could be playing football for the last years of his career?

He's the definition of an 'utter ponce' yet you're making him out to be some sort of tragic hero, did Mavies pass you on to Andrews or something? There's clearly another angle to your ponce loving.

Would you move to that discount company across the road and take less money because you are useless where you and the boss has no idea but you get more money. Over at the discount company you will be dead good at your job and have a good boss for less money.

Maybe my hangover is holding me back, but I can't work out what the fuck you're talking about Carrs that first sentence definitely needs some adjustment. Repost it with some rewording please, it's baffling me as is.

carrs wrote:Would you move to that discount company across the road and take less money because you are useless where you and the boss has no idea but you get more money. Over at the discount company you will be dead good at your job and have a good boss for less money.

I didn't want to say anything but I couldn't make head nor tail of it either!

bwfc1874 wrote:Maybe my hangover is holding me back, but I can't work out what the fuck you're talking about Carrs that first sentence definitely needs some adjustment. Repost it with some rewording please, it's baffling me as is.

I don't do request for thick happy clappers.

Carrs talks in code.

We used to have entire threads posted in Morse Code on BBC 606.

It was all pointless bollocks, but at least we put some effort in.....

Carrs is saying "Can't blame Andrews for not wanting to take a voluntary pay cut"

I agree Carrs, but I don't have to like it.

Emile Heskey anyone?

I've heard Zigic, which I would be disappointed with but this is the calibre we can expect really. He'd obviously need to take a huge wage cut, he was on £60,000 a week at Blues.

bwfc1874 wrote:

Why are you defending a player taking £20,000 a week from us and is refusing to move on even though he could be playing football for the last years of his career?

He's the definition of an 'utter ponce' yet you're making him out to be some sort of tragic hero, did Mavies pass you on to Andrews or something? There's clearly another angle to your ponce loving.

This isn't an argument about Andrews, I agree he is an utter ponce for not moving on. But let's be honest, if your boss came to you today and said he wants you to move to a rival firm on half the wages would you go?

This argument is about Freedman's attitude to the player and players in general. Fine to try and move them on, but why freeze him out of the squad? He was poor in a white shirt prior to his move to Brighton - but he clearly did something right at Brighton, so shouldn't he be given a chance to prove himself seeing as we have to pay him anyway?

Natasha Whittam wrote:
This argument is about Freedman's attitude to the player and players in general. Fine to try and move them on, but why freeze him out of the squad? 

But there's no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Dougie has tried to freeze him out or that he has the attitude you're suggesting.

You're just making it up again.